Lesson 9.1.5
9.1.5 Inferential statistics and levels of significance Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 9
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 9.1.5, Inferential statistics and levels of significance: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 9: Psychological skills, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which test is used to examine differences between two independent groups using ordinal data?
- Spearman's rho
- Chi-squared test of association
- Mann-Whitney U
- Wilcoxon signed-ranks
-
Which test is appropriate for comparing two conditions measured on the same participants using ordinal data?
- Spearman's rho
- Mann-Whitney U
- Chi-squared test
- Wilcoxon signed-ranks
-
Which test is used to measure the strength and direction of a relationship between two co-variables measured on ordinal scales?
- Spearman's rho
- Chi-squared test of difference
- Mann-Whitney U
- Wilcoxon signed-ranks
-
Which test should be used to examine the difference in frequencies of categories, such as the number of people choosing each option in two conditions?
- Spearman's rho
- Wilcoxon signed-ranks
- Chi-squared test of difference
- Mann-Whitney U
-
What are the four levels of measurement, in order from least to most informative?
- Interval, ratio, nominal, ordinal
- Nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio
- Ratio, interval, ordinal, nominal
- Ordinal, nominal, ratio, interval
-
Which level of measurement describes data such as a ranking of runners from first to last, where the gaps between ranks may not be equal?
- Interval
- Ratio
- Ordinal
- Nominal
-
A one-tailed test is used when:
- A directional hypothesis has been stated
- The data are qualitative
- The sample is randomly selected
- No direction of effect has been predicted
-
A researcher's observed value of a test is 4.10 and the critical value at p≤.05 is 3.84. What is the conclusion?
- The result is significant, so the null hypothesis is rejected
- The observed value cannot be compared with the critical value
- The result is not significant, so the null hypothesis is retained
- The critical value is wrong
-
A researcher sets the significance level at p≤.05 before the study. What does this mean?
- The researcher accepts a 5 per cent risk of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true
- The researcher will reject the null hypothesis only if the sample is smaller than 5
- The researcher is certain that 95 per cent of the sample is correct
- The researcher has proven the alternate hypothesis
-
A researcher reports p=.03 for a test. What does this mean in relation to a p≤.05 level?
- The result proves the hypothesis is true
- The result is significant at the .05 level
- The result is not significant at the .05 level
- The result is significant at the .01 level only
-
A researcher finds p=.07 with a significance level of .05. Which decision is correct?
- Reject the null hypothesis, because .07 is greater than .05
- Accept the alternate hypothesis as proven
- Retain the null hypothesis, because the result is not significant at the .05 level
- Change the significance level to .10 and reject the null hypothesis
-
What is a Type I error?
- Retaining the null hypothesis when it is actually false
- Recording data incorrectly during the study
- Rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true
- Using the wrong test for the level of data
-
What is a Type II error?
- Rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true
- Using a two-tailed test when a one-tailed test was required
- Failing to record demographic data
- Retaining the null hypothesis when it is actually false
-
Which change would reduce the chance of a Type I error?
- Removing the critical value from the analysis
- Using a stricter significance level such as .01
- Using a smaller sample to make results more significant
- Using a more lenient significance level such as .10
-
Why is the choice of statistical test linked to the level of measurement?
- Tests can be used interchangeably for any data
- Each test assumes particular types of data, so using the wrong test can produce misleading results
- Level of measurement only affects qualitative research
- Level of measurement determines the colour of the graph only
-
A researcher says the result is significant because the observed value is larger than the critical value. For a test where a larger observed value means a stronger effect, is this correct?
- No, critical values are not used in psychology
- Yes, this is correct, because a significant result requires the observed value to meet or exceed the critical value
- No, the observed value must always be negative
- No, a significant result requires the observed value to be smaller than the critical value
-
A researcher uses a two-tailed test. What does this mean in terms of the hypothesis?
- The hypothesis is non-directional, predicting a difference without stating its direction
- The hypothesis is directional, predicting a particular direction
- The data are qualitative and must be analysed in two stages
- The sample has two groups only
-
A chi-squared observed value is 7.20 with 2 degrees of freedom. The critical value at p≤.05 is 5.99. Which conclusion is correct?
- The result is not significant, because 7.20 is larger than 5.99
- The result is significant, because 7.20 is smaller than 5.99
- The result is significant, because 7.20 is larger than 5.99
- The result cannot be interpreted without a p value
-
What does a significant result tell a researcher?
- That the study has no limitations
- That the result is true for every participant
- That the observed result is unlikely to have occurred by chance if the null hypothesis were true
- That the independent variable caused every change in the dependent variable
-
A study with 200 participants finds a very small correlation that is statistically significant. Which evaluation point is most valid?
- Significance proves that the variables are causally linked
- A large sample always makes the effect important
- Statistical significance does not necessarily mean the effect is large or practically important
- Significance cannot be found in samples of this size
Related quizzes
- Theories of obedience: agency theory and social impact theory Quiz · 1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Working memory model Quiz · 2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Neurons, neurotransmitters and recreational drugs Quiz · 3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Classical conditioning and Pavlov's experiment Quiz · 4.1.1 · 20 questions
- Diagnosing mental disorders and classification systems Quiz · 5.1.1 · 20 questions
- Biological and social explanations of crime Quiz · 6.1.1 · 20 questions
- Bowlby's work on attachment Quiz · 7.1.1 · 20 questions
- Addiction, tolerance, dependency and withdrawal Quiz · 8.1.1 · 20 questions
- Milgram's obedience research and variation studies Quiz · 1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Multi-store model of memory Quiz · 2.1.2 · 20 questions