Lesson 1.1.1
1.1.1 Theories of obedience: agency theory and social impact theory Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 1.1.1, Theories of obedience: agency theory and social impact theory: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 1: Social psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
According to Milgram's agency theory, what happens when a person accepts an authority figure's legitimacy?
- They move from an agentic state into an autonomous state, taking full personal responsibility for their actions
- They move from an autonomous state into an agentic state, acting as the agent of the authority figure
- They move from a situational state into a dispositional state, so personality decides how they behave next
- They move from a moral state into an amoral state, ignoring the consequences of what they are asked to do
-
In agency theory, what is the agentic shift?
- The reduction in personal responsibility felt when a task is divided between several people working together
- The process by which a person's moral values change slowly over many years of exposure to a dominant culture
- The move from acting on one's own judgement to acting on an authority figure's instructions when that authority is perceived as legitimate
- The gradual increase in the number of people who follow a crowd's emotional mood when a leader gives a speech
-
Which three factors does social impact theory (Latane, 1981) say determine the impact of social influence?
- Length of exposure, size of reward and degree of personal control
- Gender, age and social class of the sources
- Strength, immediacy and number of sources
- Cultural norms, legal authority and the presence of a uniform
-
According to social impact theory, how does the number of sources of influence affect the impact on an individual?
- Impact falls as sources grow, because responsibility for the outcome is spread across more people
- Impact rises in direct proportion, so doubling the number of sources always doubles the impact
- Impact rises as the number of sources grows, but each extra source adds less than the one before
- Impact is unchanged once two sources are present, because a pair is enough to create full pressure
-
A soldier fires on civilians and says, 'I was only following orders.' Which theory best explains this behaviour?
- Agency theory, because the soldier has moved into an agentic state under legitimate authority
- Social identity theory, because the soldier has adopted the in-group identity of the unit
- Realistic conflict theory, because the soldier was competing with civilians for scarce resources
- Social impact theory alone, because the number of soldiers in the unit is the only relevant factor
-
A protest of 2,000 people has more social impact on a bystander than a protest of 200 people in the same place. Which theory predicts this?
- Social identity theory, because a larger crowd always increases the bystander's sense of group membership
- Social impact theory, because a larger number of sources increases impact, though with diminishing returns
- Agency theory, because a larger crowd signals a more legitimate authority to the bystander
- Realistic conflict theory, because a larger crowd always increases competition for resources
-
In social impact theory, which factor is most directly shown when a pressure source is physically close and present in the room?
- Number of sources
- Immediacy
- Legitimacy of the source
- Duration of exposure
-
A participant says, 'The experimenter is responsible for what happens, not me.' Which concept does this statement illustrate?
- Diffusion of responsibility, in which blame is shared equally among a large group of people
- Cognitive dissonance reduction, in which a person changes their attitude to match their behaviour
- Self-serving attribution bias, in which a person blames external events for their own failures
- The agentic shift, in which responsibility is handed to the authority figure
-
Which statement best describes the autonomous state in agency theory?
- A person acts in a crowd and takes on the shared emotional mood of the group around them
- A person acts according to their own conscience and judges what is right and wrong for themselves
- A person acts according to the orders of a legitimate authority and does not consider the consequences
- A person acts only when rewarded, and changes behaviour in response to expected rewards
-
Which of these is a limitation of agency theory as an explanation of obedience?
- It relies on a computer model that cannot be tested with human participants in any experimental design
- It claims that obedience is caused only by genetic factors, which cannot be changed by the environment
- It predicts that obedience is always the same for every person in every situation, leaving no room for variation
- It gives limited account of why some individuals resist authority, so it does not explain all variation in obedience
-
A researcher reports that obedience falls when the authority figure is less legitimate. How does this support agency theory?
- It shows that participants were simply tired and therefore less willing to continue with the task
- It shows that obedience depends only on the personality of the participant and not on the setting at all
- It shows that obedience is caused by group size, since a less legitimate authority attracts fewer people
- It shows that perceived legitimacy of the authority is a key trigger for moving into the agentic state
-
In social impact theory, what is meant by 'strength' of a source?
- How many people are physically in the room at the time of the influence
- How loudly the source speaks when it attempts to influence the person
- How long the person has been exposed to the influence over the past year
- How important and powerful the source is to the person being influenced
-
Latane's social impact theory is mainly concerned with which level of explanation?
- The genetic transmission of personality traits from parents to their children
- The chemical processes in the brain that produce conformity to group norms
- The impact of others on an individual's behaviour and attitudes in a social situation
- The economic consequences of group decisions in large organisations and markets
-
Which pair correctly matches a concept with its theory in the topic of obedience?
- Strength with agency theory; autonomous state with social identity theory
- Realistic conflict with agency theory; agentic state with social impact theory
- Agentic state with agency theory; diminishing returns with social impact theory
- Positive distinctiveness with agency theory; immediacy with realistic conflict theory
-
In agency theory, which factor is most likely to make a person enter the agentic state?
- The person is anonymous to the authority and cannot be identified in any later record of the event
- The person is offered a large financial reward for each action they carry out in the task
- The authority figure appears legitimate and the person accepts that the authority has the right to direct them
- The person is alone and has no one to share responsibility with at the time of the request
-
A researcher wants to test social impact theory directly. Which manipulation should she use?
- Vary the colour of the room while keeping all sources identical in strength, immediacy and number
- Vary the amount of sleep the participant had while keeping the group size constant for everyone
- Vary the participant's age while keeping the number of sources and their immediacy the same across groups
- Vary the number of people delivering the same message while keeping the message and their strength constant
-
Which conclusion is best supported by agency theory when a participant keeps administering shocks while protesting?
- The participant has no moral sense at all and feels no discomfort or distress during the procedure
- The participant has been hypnotised by the experimenter, so their own judgement no longer operates at all
- The participant's behaviour is entirely random because the agentic state removes all emotion from decisions
- The participant is in the agentic state, feeling responsible to the experimenter while still experiencing conflict
-
A student evaluates agency theory: 'It explains obedience in hierarchies but not why people sometimes refuse.' What kind of evaluation is this?
- An ethical criticism, since the theory involves deception of participants about the nature of the study
- A strength of the theory, showing that it predicts every instance of obedience with complete accuracy
- A limitation of the theory, pointing to an aspect of obedience that the theory does not explain well
- A methodological criticism of the sample, since the participants were not representative of a population
-
Social impact theory predicts that doubling the number of sources will produce what effect on an individual?
- No change at all, because only the strength of the first source determines the individual's behaviour
- A larger increase than the first source did, because more sources always add more impact at each step
- A reduction in impact, because each source divides the pressure and so weakens the effect on the person
- A smaller increase than the first source did, because impact shows diminishing returns with more sources
-
Which theory of obedience would predict that a person obeys less when the instruction comes from someone with no status or legitimacy?
- Realistic conflict theory, since obedience depends on competition for scarce resources between groups
- Social impact theory alone, since obedience depends only on the number of people who are watching
- Social identity theory, since obedience depends on how strongly a person identifies with their own group
- Agency theory, since legitimacy of the authority is the trigger for the agentic state
Related quizzes
- Milgram's obedience research and variation studies Quiz · 1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting obedience and dissent Quiz · 1.1.3 · 20 questions
- Explanations of prejudice: social identity and realistic conflict theory Quiz · 1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting prejudice and discrimination Quiz · 1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in obedience and prejudice Quiz · 1.1.6 · 20 questions
- Self-report design: questionnaires, interviews and sampling Quiz · 1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Analysing social psychology data and BPS ethics Quiz · 1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Sherif's Robbers Cave, Burger, Reicher and Haslam, and Cohrs studies Quiz · 1.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: applying social psychology to society Quiz · 1.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in social psychology Quiz · 1.6.1 · 20 questions