Lesson 7.1.5
7.1.5 Cross-cultural attachment and nature-nurture Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 7
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 7.1.5, Cross-cultural attachment and nature-nurture: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 7: Child psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which researchers carried out a meta-analysis of cross-cultural Strange Situation studies?
- Van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg
- Loftus and Palmer
- Rosenhan and Seligman
- Baron-Cohen and Frith
-
Which attachment type was found to be the most common across cultures in cross-cultural research?
- Type B, secure attachment
- Type D, disorganised
- Type C, insecure-resistant
- Type A, insecure-avoidant
-
What is the nature-nurture debate in development?
- Whether two schools of art influenced each other
- Whether development is shaped mainly by genes or mainly by experience and environment
- Whether children should be raised at home or in a nursery
- Whether attachment should be classified into four types
-
What did cross-cultural studies find about the distribution of attachment types?
- Only avoidant attachment appears in any culture
- The proportions vary between countries, though secure attachment is usually the most common type
- Attachment types cannot be classified in other cultures
- Every country shows exactly the same proportions of each type
-
What does the universality of attachment types mean?
- Attachment types change completely from year to year
- Attachment types depend only on the infant's diet
- The same attachment types are found across different cultures
- Attachment types are only found in one culture
-
Which finding from the cross-cultural meta-analysis is most important for the debate about culture?
- Attachment is identical in every infant of every culture
- Variation within a culture is often greater than variation between cultures
- Only the Strange Situation can be used to study attachment
- Culture has no effect on attachment whatsoever
-
Why is cross-cultural research relevant to the nature-nurture debate?
- It shows that nature and nurture have no relevance to development
- It shows that development is random and unrelated to either
- It proves that nurture is always more important than nature
- Universal patterns suggest a biological basis, while differences suggest environmental influence
-
A cross-cultural study finds secure attachment is the most common type in every country studied. Which conclusion is best supported?
- The pattern suggests a biological basis for secure attachment, though culture may still shape its expression
- Culture has no influence on any child's development
- The results cannot be interpreted at all
- Nature is entirely irrelevant to attachment
-
In one culture most infants are classified as avoidant. Which cultural factor could contribute to this?
- A preference for very early bedtimes
- A high number of cars in the city
- Child-rearing that emphasises early independence and limits close physical contact
- A low level of rainfall in the region
-
In a sample of 200 infants, 130 were classified as secure. What percentage were secure?
- 35 per cent
- 13 per cent
- 65 per cent
- 70 per cent
-
Which evidence would most weaken a purely learned account of attachment?
- A survey of teachers about classroom behaviour
- Similar attachment patterns appearing across very different cultures and child-rearing practices
- A single case of an infant with an unusual diet
- Differences in attachment within a single family
-
Why must researchers take care when translating the Strange Situation for use across countries?
- Translation is never needed for research
- Instructions and procedures must be matched so that results are comparable across cultures
- Translation makes the infants speak in a new language
- Translation changes the number of episodes in the procedure
-
Which term describes a developmental outcome that depends on both an inherited tendency and the environment?
- Gene-environment interaction
- Cognitive dissonance
- Monotropy
- Operant conditioning
-
Why does a cross-cultural meta-analysis combine many studies?
- To reduce the sample to a single individual
- To guarantee that every study reports the same result
- To estimate universality with greater statistical power and less influence from any single study
- To avoid the need for any statistical testing
-
In a country, 150 infants are classified as 70 per cent Type B, 20 per cent Type A and 10 per cent Type C. How many are Type A?
- 30
- 45
- 15
- 20
-
Which argument best supports an interactionist view of attachment development?
- Attachment is unrelated to any individual difference
- Attachment is entirely fixed by genes at birth
- Biological temperament interacts with caregiving to shape the security of the attachment
- Attachment is entirely learned with no biological input
-
Is cross-cultural evidence enough to settle the nature-nurture debate about attachment?
- No, because it shows patterns consistent with both biology and environment but cannot fully separate them
- Yes, because all cultures are identical
- Yes, because cross-cultural evidence always proves one side
- No, because cross-cultural research never produces any data
-
What limits a cross-cultural meta-analysis of Strange Situation studies?
- Studies may differ in samples, procedures and translation, so results may not be directly comparable
- Meta-analyses always require the same infants in every study
- Meta-analyses can only use studies published in one language
- Meta-analyses never report averages or percentages
-
Why might cultural bias threaten cross-cultural research on attachment?
- Cultural bias has no connection to measurement
- A measure developed in one culture may not capture meaningful behaviour in another, threatening validity
- Cultural bias always makes results more accurate
- Culture bias only affects the number of pages in a report
-
What is a strength of cross-cultural research on attachment?
- It helps separate universal patterns from culture-specific ones
- It avoids the need for any measurement at all
- It removes all cultural differences from the data
- It always uses the same infants in every country
Related quizzes
- Bowlby's work on attachment Quiz · 7.1.1 · 20 questions
- Ainsworth's attachment types and the Strange Situation Quiz · 7.1.2 · 20 questions
- Deprivation and privation Quiz · 7.1.3 · 20 questions
- Day care: advantages, disadvantages and quality Quiz · 7.1.4 · 20 questions
- Autism: features, explanations and therapies Quiz · 7.1.6 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in child psychology Quiz · 7.1.7 · 20 questions
- Observation, questionnaires, interviews and cross-cultural research Quiz · 7.2.1 · 20 questions
- Researching with children: ethics and data analysis Quiz · 7.2.2 · 20 questions
- van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg, Cassibba, Gagnon-Oosterwaal and Li studies Quiz · 7.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: day care and international adoption Quiz · 7.4.1 · 20 questions