Lesson 7.3.1
7.3.1 van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg, Cassibba, Gagnon-Oosterwaal and Li studies Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 7
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 7.3.1, van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg, Cassibba, Gagnon-Oosterwaal and Li studies: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 7: Child psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What research method did van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) use to combine findings from Strange Situation studies across countries?
- A structured questionnaire given to parents
- A laboratory experiment with random allocation
- A longitudinal case study of one family
- A meta-analysis of many Strange Situation studies
-
In van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988), which attachment type was found to be the most common across the cultures studied?
- Insecure-avoidant
- Disorganised
- Insecure-resistant
- Secure
-
Van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) found that differences between cultures were smaller than what other kind of difference?
- Differences between the individual children within each culture
- Differences between genders within the same culture
- Differences between the years in which the studies were run
- Differences between the researchers who ran each study
-
Why is a meta-analysis such as van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) useful for testing whether attachment types are universal?
- It pools many samples from different countries, so the pattern can be checked across cultures
- It uses one large sample from a single country
- It removes the need for any standard procedure like the Strange Situation
- It guarantees that the results will be statistically significant
-
A key limitation of a meta-analysis like van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) is that it depends on which factor?
- The age of the researcher who writes the summary
- The quality and comparability of the original studies included
- The number of participants who were paid for their time
- The use of a double-blind procedure in every study
-
Cassibba et al. (2013) investigated attachment 'the Italian way'. What is the main purpose of such a study in cross-cultural research?
- To show that Italian children cannot be assessed with the Strange Situation
- To identify a new attachment type that exists only in Italy
- To measure the effect of day care on language development only
- To test whether attachment patterns found elsewhere, such as in Ainsworth's work, apply to children in Italy
-
Gagnon-Oosterwaal et al. (2012) studied 7-year-old international adoptees. Which variable were the researchers primarily interested in?
- The children's scores on a test of pitch discrimination
- The number of years each child spent in school
- The amount of time each child spent with siblings
- Pre-adoption adversity and self-reported behaviour problems
-
A study finds that children who experienced greater adversity before adoption show more behaviour problems at age 7. What is the most appropriate conclusion?
- Adversity before adoption causes behaviour problems in every child
- There is a positive association between pre-adoption adversity and behaviour problems, so adversity may be a risk factor
- Behaviour problems at age 7 cause the adversity before adoption
- Adoption always prevents behaviour problems
-
Li et al. (2013) examined timing of high-quality child care. Which statement best describes the question this study addresses?
- Whether the age at which children receive high-quality care relates to their later cognitive and language development
- Whether children can be sorted into attachment types from their day-care records
- Whether attachment security predicts adult friendships
- Whether parents prefer home care or day care in the first year of life
-
Li et al. (2013) is described as a study of cognitive, language and pre-academic development. Which type of design is needed to examine whether earlier care is linked to later outcomes?
- A content analysis of television programmes
- A cross-sectional design measuring all children at a single point
- A longitudinal design following children over time
- A matched pairs experiment with random allocation to care
-
Van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) combined samples from different countries. Which weakness does this approach share with cross-cultural research in general?
- It produces only qualitative data
- It always gives identical results in every culture
- It cannot compare any two cultures at all
- Results may be confounded by differences in sampling, procedures and translation across cultures
-
Which evaluation point about the use of the Strange Situation in cross-cultural attachment research is most valid?
- It cannot classify children into secure or insecure categories
- It is a perfectly neutral measure in every culture because it is standardised
- It is only ever used with adults
- It was designed in one culture, so cultural differences in behaviour may affect how children's responses are interpreted
-
A researcher reanalyses data from 15 attachment studies and reports the average proportion of secure infants across them. Which statistic is the researcher reporting?
- A measure of central tendency
- A chi-squared value
- A measure of dispersion
- A correlation coefficient
-
A study reports that secure attachment is the most common type in five countries, with insecure types varying by country. What does 'most common' refer to in this context?
- The modal category, the attachment type that occurs most frequently in the sample
- The number of researchers involved in the study
- The lowest score on the Strange Situation
- The median age at which children were tested
-
Van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) suggest that cultural differences in attachment may reflect what?
- Differences in the genetic code of the children only
- Random error in the way the Strange Situation was scored
- Differences in child-rearing practices and the sensitivity of caregivers in different societies
- Differences in the colour of the rooms used for testing
-
Why might a study of adoptees such as Gagnon-Oosterwaal et al. (2012) be considered to have high ecological validity?
- Because it studies real children and their actual adoption histories in everyday settings
- Because it is conducted in a laboratory with controlled variables
- Because it uses only one child who is closely observed
- Because all variables are manipulated by the researcher
-
Gagnon-Oosterwaal et al. (2012) studied adoptees at age 7. Why might the researchers have collected data from parents?
- Because children aged 7 are unable to say anything about their behaviour
- Because the study was not allowed to involve any child directly
- Because parents' reports are always more accurate than observations
- Because parents can give a reliable self-report about their own child's behaviour across many situations
-
A study of day care and cognitive development is described as having a control group of children with no day care. Which feature of the design does this illustrate?
- The use of a longitudinal design only
- A matched pairs design with children paired on IQ
- Naturalistic observation in the home
- A baseline for comparison, so that any effect of day care can be judged against it
-
Li et al. (2013) found that high-quality care was linked to better outcomes. A critic argues that families who choose high-quality care may differ in other ways. Which problem does this criticism identify?
- The investigator effect
- Confounding variables such as family income or parental education
- Experimenter bias in scoring
- Demand characteristics
-
Taken together, what general conclusion do the four named studies in this area support about child development?
- Day care always harms children's development
- Attachment and development are shaped by early experience and context, though the effects vary across cultures and circumstances
- Cross-cultural research cannot tell us anything useful about children
- Attachment is entirely fixed at birth and cannot be affected by experience
Related quizzes
- Bowlby's work on attachment Quiz · 7.1.1 · 20 questions
- Ainsworth's attachment types and the Strange Situation Quiz · 7.1.2 · 20 questions
- Deprivation and privation Quiz · 7.1.3 · 20 questions
- Day care: advantages, disadvantages and quality Quiz · 7.1.4 · 20 questions
- Cross-cultural attachment and nature-nurture Quiz · 7.1.5 · 20 questions
- Autism: features, explanations and therapies Quiz · 7.1.6 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in child psychology Quiz · 7.1.7 · 20 questions
- Observation, questionnaires, interviews and cross-cultural research Quiz · 7.2.1 · 20 questions
- Researching with children: ethics and data analysis Quiz · 7.2.2 · 20 questions
- Key question: day care and international adoption Quiz · 7.4.1 · 20 questions