Lesson 7.1.3
7.1.3 Deprivation and privation Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 7
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 7.1.3, Deprivation and privation: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 7: Child psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is deprivation in the context of attachment research?
- Forming attachments with many different carers at once
- The loss of an attachment that a child previously had, for example through separation
- A lack of food during early childhood only
- Never having formed any attachment at all
-
What is privation in the context of attachment research?
- Forming a strong attachment with a teacher
- Having several attachments that are equally strong
- Losing an attachment after a long separation
- Never having formed an attachment with a caregiver
-
Which short-term effect of deprivation is commonly reported in children?
- Increased height within a single week
- Immediate improvement in language skills
- Distress and protest during separation from the attachment figure
- Complete immunity to later emotional problems
-
What did Rutter (1981) argue about the effects of deprivation?
- They are always identical in every child
- They depend on factors such as the duration of separation, age at separation and later experiences
- They appear only in children older than ten years
- They can never be reduced by later experiences
-
What did the Koluchová twins case study show?
- Recovery from deprivation is only possible in adulthood
- Twins are immune to the effects of deprivation
- Severe early deprivation could be reversed when the twins were placed in a stable, loving home
- Early deprivation always causes permanent damage
-
The English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) study examined which group of children?
- English children fostered in Romanian homes
- Romanian children adopted from institutions into English families
- Children attending schools in Romania
- Romanian adults living in a care home
-
How can the negative effects of deprivation be reduced?
- By keeping the child in isolation for longer
- By providing a stable, responsive relationship and good-quality care after the separation
- By removing all emotional contact with adults
- By avoiding any form of contact with other children
-
A child moved from institutional care to a stable foster home at age two. Which factor most strongly predicts recovery?
- The colour of the child's bedroom
- The number of toys the child owned before the move
- The quality and stability of the care received after the move
- The child's height at the time of the move
-
The ERA study found that children adopted before six months generally recovered better than those adopted later. What does this suggest?
- Adoption before six months always causes permanent damage
- The age at which privation ends affects the chances of full recovery
- Age at adoption has no effect on any outcome
- Only children adopted after age ten recover
-
A child who is indiscriminately friendly to strangers and seeks attention from anyone shows which pattern?
- No social behaviour of any kind
- Disinhibited attachment, linked to privation
- A fear of all adults in the environment
- Secure attachment with the main caregiver
-
Of 60 children who experienced privation, 45 showed good recovery. What percentage recovered?
- 45 per cent
- 60 per cent
- 15 per cent
- 75 per cent
-
Why are natural cases of privation studied rather than deliberate deprivation experiments?
- Natural cases involve fewer participants than experiments
- Deliberately depriving children would be unethical
- Natural cases are always cheaper to study
- Natural cases produce data that are easier to analyse
-
In Robertson and Bowlby's account of separation, which stage follows protest and despair?
- Attachment
- Protest again
- Monotropy
- Detachment
-
What best explains the recovery of the Koluchová twins?
- Medical treatment that cured all brain changes
- Their early isolation, which made them more resilient
- Chance, with no link to the care they received
- Stable, loving care that allowed a new attachment to form
-
Which research design best shows whether deprivation effects reduce over time?
- A laboratory test of memory with adults
- A single cross-sectional survey at one time point
- A content analysis of newspaper articles
- A longitudinal follow-up of the same children after their care improved
-
A researcher argues that privation always causes permanent damage. Which evaluation is most appropriate?
- The claim is accurate and needs no evidence
- The claim has been proven true by every study
- The claim is too strong, because outcomes depend on timing, duration and the quality of later care
- The claim is irrelevant to child development
-
What is a strength of the ERA design for studying privation?
- It compares children adopted at different ages without deliberately depriving anyone
- It allows the results to be generalised to all animals
- It measures the children at only one moment
- It removes all need for consent from families
-
In one group, 27 of 30 children adopted before six months showed typical attachment. In another group, 12 of 20 adopted later did. What is the difference in percentage points?
- 90 percentage points
- 30 percentage points
- 15 percentage points
- 60 percentage points
-
What is a limitation of the Koluchová case study as evidence about deprivation?
- It concerns only two twins, so generalisation to all deprived children is limited
- It used a questionnaire with no reliability
- It included far too many children to analyse
- It was conducted entirely online with adults
-
Why do deprivation and privation research together suggest that early experience matters but is not inevitable?
- Early experience always determines the outcome completely
- Later experiences never influence development
- Early experience affects development, but later experiences can change the outcome
- Early experience has no effect on later development
Related quizzes
- Bowlby's work on attachment Quiz · 7.1.1 · 20 questions
- Ainsworth's attachment types and the Strange Situation Quiz · 7.1.2 · 20 questions
- Day care: advantages, disadvantages and quality Quiz · 7.1.4 · 20 questions
- Cross-cultural attachment and nature-nurture Quiz · 7.1.5 · 20 questions
- Autism: features, explanations and therapies Quiz · 7.1.6 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in child psychology Quiz · 7.1.7 · 20 questions
- Observation, questionnaires, interviews and cross-cultural research Quiz · 7.2.1 · 20 questions
- Researching with children: ethics and data analysis Quiz · 7.2.2 · 20 questions
- van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg, Cassibba, Gagnon-Oosterwaal and Li studies Quiz · 7.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: day care and international adoption Quiz · 7.4.1 · 20 questions