Lesson 3.1.1.2.4
3.1.1.2.4 Murdock's serial position curve study Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.1.1.2.4, Murdock's serial position curve study: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE Psychology (8182), Unit 1: Memory, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What type of recall did Murdock's participants use in his serial position study?
- Cued recall, recalling the words when given a word that starts with the same letter
- Free recall, recalling the words in any order
- Recognition, deciding whether each word had appeared in the earlier list
- Serial recall, recalling the words in the exact order of presentation
-
What shape did Murdock's serial position curve show?
- A straight line showing that every word in the list was recalled equally often
- An inverted U shape, with better recall in the middle of the list than at its ends
- A U-shaped curve, with better recall at the start and end of the list than in the middle
- A rising line showing that words at the end were recalled much less often than the start
-
What kind of word list did Murdock use?
- Lists of unrelated words presented one after another
- Lists of numbers that the participants had to recall in the exact order given
- Lists of related words that all belong to the same category, such as different animals
- Lists of pictures shown on a screen one after another during each learning trial
-
Which two effects did Murdock's serial position curve demonstrate?
- Interference and decay effects, both shown across the whole list of words
- Serial and cued recall effects, both shown when the participants were given cues
- Primacy and recency effects
- Context and state-dependent effects, both shown when the learning place was changed
-
Murdock's participants recalled early list words best. What does this suggest?
- Early words were coded as images, which are easier to recall than words in lists
- Early words were held in sensory memory until the recall stage of the test began
- Early words were displaced by later words in long-term memory during the recall stage
- Early words were more likely to be transferred into long-term memory
-
Why did Murdock use free recall instead of serial recall?
- It forces participants to recall the words in the same order as presentation, removing primacy
- It shows which words were recalled first without forcing the order of recall
- It removes the recency effect, so that only the primacy effect can be measured in the test
- It makes participants use recognition, which is easier to score accurately than recall is
-
If Murdock had used a distractor task after the list, what would be expected for the recency part?
- Recency would disappear completely, because the last words would move into sensory memory
- Recency would be unchanged, because the distractor task only affects long-term memory
- Recency would be increased, because the last words would be rehearsed during the distractor task
- Recency would be reduced, because the last words would be displaced from short-term memory
-
Murdock's study supported the multi-store model. Which finding gives the strongest support for two separate stores?
- Recall was random across positions, which shows that no store is involved in recalling words
- Primacy and recency effects differ, which suggests two stores, one for each effect
- Recall was the same at every position, which suggests one store handles all of the items
- Recall was highest in the middle, which suggests a single store that is strongest at the centre
-
What was the main purpose of recording the position of each word in Murdock's study?
- To measure how long each word stayed in the sensory store before it decayed in the lab
- To check whether participants could recall the words in the exact order of presentation
- To count how many words each participant could recognise as having been on the list
- To see whether words at the start, middle and end of the list were recalled at different rates
-
Which feature of Murdock's curve best links to short-term memory?
- The middle part, where words are poorly recalled because they are coded only as images
- The recency part, where the last words are recalled well when recall starts straight away
- The overall height of the curve, which shows the total capacity of long-term memory
- The primacy part, where the first words are recalled well because they are in sensory memory
-
Which limitation of Murdock's study is most relevant to how far the results apply to real life?
- The curve only shows primacy, so recency cannot be studied with word lists in any situation
- Lists of unrelated words are artificial, so recall may not reflect how people remember meaningful information
- Participants were asked to recall the words in order, so the results cannot show primacy at all
- Lists were too long for any participant to recall, so the results cannot be measured reliably
-
A participant recalls the first and last words of a list well but not the middle. Which result is this?
- A declining curve showing recall getting worse with each word as the list goes on
- An inverted curve showing the middle words recalled best of all in that participant's list
- A linear curve showing equal recall at every position in the list for that participant
- A U-shaped serial position curve for that participant
-
Who conducted the serial position curve study described in the specification?
- Murdock, who used lists of words in a free recall task
- Gibson, who studied direct perception of the environment in everyday life
- Bruner, who studied how expectations affect what people perceive
- Bartlett, who studied memory for a folk story from another culture
-
In Murdock's serial position study, what was the main outcome measure?
- The accuracy of the order in which each participant recalled the words in the test
- The number of words each participant correctly recognised as having been on the list
- The proportion of words recalled from each position in the list
- The time taken by each participant to read each word aloud during the learning phase
-
Which pattern from a replication would count against the two-store explanation of the curve?
- A flat serial position curve, with no difference in recall between the start, middle and end
- A curve where recency is reduced after a distractor task, as the two-store account predicts
- A curve where recall at the start is higher than in the middle, as the model would expect
- A U-shaped curve with a clear primacy part and a clear recency part in the results
-
A teacher uses the serial position findings to order a revision list. Which advice follows?
- Put the most important items after a long distractor task, so that the recency effect is strongest
- Put the most important items in the middle of the list, where they receive the most rehearsal
- Put the most important items at random positions, so that no position has an advantage
- Put the most important items at the start and end of the list, where they are best recalled
-
Which feature of Murdock's method means it can test long-term memory as well as short-term memory?
- Free recall of early items from a long list, which are in long-term memory after the list ends
- Serial recall, which forces participants to hold each word in sensory memory before recall
- Recognition, which needs participants to remember exactly where each word was placed in the list
- A list of numbers, which uses semantic coding in long-term memory only during the test
-
A replication finds a strong primacy effect but no recency effect. Which explanation fits the model best?
- The last items were held in sensory memory, which fades before recall begins and so removes recency
- A delay before recall cleared the last items from short-term memory, leaving only early items in long-term memory
- Participants rehearsed the last items so often that they were transferred into sensory memory instead
- The early items were never encoded, so primacy must come from the sensory store rather than long-term memory
-
Why does Murdock's result suggest that recall depends on the position of an item in a list?
- Recall depends on the colour or size of each word, which is a feature unrelated to the position in the list
- Recall depends only on the length of the list, and the position of an item has no effect on recall
- Items at the end are always recalled first whatever their position, so position matters only for recognition
- Items in different positions have different chances of being transferred or held, so their recall differs
-
In a 30-word list, the middle of the curve is flat and low. Which explanation is best supported by the model?
- Middle items were stored in sensory memory, which holds them for longer than the start or end
- Middle items were rehearsed too much, which leads to their loss from long-term memory later on
- Middle items were all coded as images, which cannot be recalled at all in a free recall test
- Middle items were displaced from short-term memory and not yet transferred to long-term memory
Related quizzes
- Encoding, storage and retrieval: how memories are encoded and stored Quiz · 3.1.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Episodic, semantic and procedural memory Quiz · 3.1.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Multi-store model: sensory, short-term and long-term memory Quiz · 3.1.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Coding, capacity and duration of each memory store Quiz · 3.1.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Primacy and recency effects and the serial position effect Quiz · 3.1.1.2.3 · 20 questions
- Theory of Reconstructive Memory and effort after meaning Quiz · 3.1.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study Quiz · 3.1.1.3.2 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting accuracy of memory: interference, context, false memories Quiz · 3.1.1.3.3 · 20 questions
- Difference between sensation and perception Quiz · 3.1.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Brain structures from the womb: brain stem, thalamus, cerebellum, cortex Quiz · 3.1.3.1.1 · 20 questions