Lesson 3.1.1.3.2
3.1.1.3.2 Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.1.1.3.2, Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE Psychology (8182), Unit 1: Memory, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What was the main material used in Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study?
- A set of drawings of everyday objects shown one after another in a fixed order
- A Native American folk story that was unfamiliar to his British participants
- A short film showing a car crash, shown at different speeds to different groups
- A list of unrelated words read aloud at a steady pace to each participant in turn
-
Why was an unfamiliar story chosen in Bartlett's study?
- Participants were very familiar with it, so they could recall it in full and in exact detail
- It was long, so it could test the capacity of short-term memory directly in the participants
- It was built from a list of words, so it could test serial recall of each item in the list
- Participants had no existing schema for it, so the effects of prior knowledge on recall could be seen
-
What did Bartlett find happened to the story when it was reproduced?
- It became a list of unrelated events, with the order of the story lost completely in recall
- It became longer, with more unfamiliar details added in each reproduction by participants
- It became shorter and more coherent, with unfamiliar details changed or removed
- It stayed the same length and wording, showing that recall is an exact copy of the input
-
What is a repeated reproduction in Bartlett's study?
- Presenting the story in a different language on each occasion it was read to the participant
- Reading the story aloud to the participant several times in a single session with no break
- Asking participants to draw the story instead of writing or speaking it back after a delay
- Recalling the story again after a delay, with the same participant recalling it several times over
-
A participant replaces an unfamiliar object in the story with a more familiar one. Which explanation fits Bartlett's findings?
- The participant coded the unfamiliar word acoustically, so a similar-sounding familiar word was recalled
- The participant recalled the familiar word from sensory memory, where it was the first image seen
- Unfamiliar material was altered to match the participant's own schema for everyday objects
- The participant rehearsed the familiar word more than the unfamiliar one, so it replaced the other
-
Why do Bartlett's findings suggest that schemas guide what is remembered?
- Participants recalled every detail because the story matched their existing knowledge perfectly
- Participants forgot the story in the same order on each occasion, showing a fixed serial position effect
- Participants stored the story as a sensory image, which was reduced by rehearsal of familiar parts
- Participants filled gaps with familiar expectations, so recall was shaped by what they already knew
-
A researcher repeats the study with a story full of supernatural beings. Which result is most consistent with reconstruction?
- The story is recalled in full after a single reading only, with no changes at any later occasion
- The story is recalled in reverse order, with the supernatural references placed at the start instead
- The supernatural references are reduced or replaced over repeated recall, making the story more conventional
- The story is recalled word for word each time, with the supernatural references kept intact throughout
-
Why would a participant who read the story only once be unlikely to recall it exactly after a long delay?
- A single reading is always stored in short-term memory, which lasts about a year at most
- Recall after a long delay is rebuilt from schemas, which changes the story as it is reconstructed
- A single reading is stored as a list of words, which is always lost completely after a year
- A single reading lasts only a few seconds in the sensory store, so no trace survives the delay
-
Which conclusion from Bartlett's study best supports the idea that memory is an active process?
- Recall depends on the number of items in the story, which must be under seven to be recalled
- Recall stays the same across reproductions, showing that the input is copied exactly into memory
- Recall is better for the start and end of the story than for its middle section that was read
- Recall changes systematically towards what makes sense to the participant, rather than being an exact copy of input
-
How does serial reproduction differ from repeated reproduction by one individual?
- In serial reproduction the story is read to a group at the same time, with no delay before recall
- In serial reproduction one person recalls the story many times, each time learning it from the previous recall
- In serial reproduction each person retells the story heard from the previous person, so changes build up
- In serial reproduction the story is recalled in pictures only, so no words can be changed or lost
-
How did Bartlett describe the way participants made the story meaningful?
- Serial rehearsal, repeating the story in a fixed order until it is fully stored in memory
- Effort after meaning, a drive to make sense of unfamiliar material
- Chunking, grouping the story into small units of about seven items each for recall later
- Sensory coding, storing the story as a visual image in a fixed order that is then recalled
-
Which change to the story best shows effort after meaning?
- A story with a long list of names was recalled in exact order on each occasion of recall
- A story with a strong rhythm was remembered better in the middle than at its start or end
- A story with clear numbers was recalled with the numbers placed in reverse order by participants
- An unusual ending was changed into a more conventional ending during repeated recall
-
Which measure would best show reconstruction in a class repeat of Bartlett's study?
- Counting how many words each participant could say in a single minute of recall of the story
- Timing how quickly each participant read the story aloud during the first reading of the story
- Measuring the height of the serial position curve for each participant's list of story words
- Comparing each recall with the original story to count omissions, additions and changes
-
Bartlett's findings are a challenge to which earlier view of memory?
- Murdock's view that free recall shows only primacy and recency effects and nothing else
- The view that memory is a stored copy that is transferred and retrieved unchanged
- Gregory's view that illusions are caused by misread depth cues in the visual field
- Gibson's view that perception needs no inference because the environment is rich in information
-
Which story features were most likely to be changed in Bartlett's study?
- Familiar, everyday details that matched the participants' expectations about the world around them
- Unfamiliar, culturally unusual details that did not fit the participants' expectations
- The first and last sentences, because they are recalled best in any kind of memory at all
- Numbers and dates, because they are always coded acoustically in long-term memory by learners
-
A participant recalls a story but adds an ending that matches their own culture. What is this best called?
- Retrieval failure, a missing cue that stops the original ending from being found in memory
- Rationalisation, a change that makes the story fit existing expectations
- Rehearsal, a repetition that keeps the original ending of the story in long-term memory
- Decay, a loss of the original ending from the sensory store before the story was recalled
-
Why might the reproductions in Bartlett's study be shorter than the original story?
- Details that were hard to make sense of were left out, because they did not fit a schema
- Details were stored in the sensory store, which can only hold a few seconds of the story
- Details were lost because the short-term store holds only seven items of the story in full
- Details were lost because the story was rehearsed in the same order on each occasion of recall
-
Why did recall in Bartlett's study change over time rather than staying fixed?
- Memory decays from the sensory store after each recall, so details are replaced by new ones
- Memory is stored as a fixed copy, and retrieval adds small errors each time it is carried out
- Interference from the story's later part pushes out the earlier details of the story from memory
- Memory is rebuilt at each recall using schemas, so the account drifts towards what is familiar
-
Which result from Bartlett's study would count most strongly against a fixed-copy view of memory?
- Changes to the story that were consistent in direction, towards more familiar and conventional forms
- Recall was poorer for the story's middle section than for its start and end, as a fixed copy predicts
- Recall lasted longer for familiar stories than for the unfamiliar story used in the study
- Some participants recalled the story word for word, which shows that exact copies are possible
-
Who were the participants in Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study?
- Children who were shown the story as a series of pictures in a school classroom setting
- Students who were taught the story in a formal class lesson before being tested on it
- Native American participants who knew the folk story from childhood in their own community
- British participants who were unfamiliar with the Native American folk story they read
Related quizzes
- Encoding, storage and retrieval: how memories are encoded and stored Quiz · 3.1.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Episodic, semantic and procedural memory Quiz · 3.1.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Multi-store model: sensory, short-term and long-term memory Quiz · 3.1.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Coding, capacity and duration of each memory store Quiz · 3.1.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Primacy and recency effects and the serial position effect Quiz · 3.1.1.2.3 · 20 questions
- Murdock's serial position curve study Quiz · 3.1.1.2.4 · 20 questions
- Theory of Reconstructive Memory and effort after meaning Quiz · 3.1.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting accuracy of memory: interference, context, false memories Quiz · 3.1.1.3.3 · 20 questions
- Difference between sensation and perception Quiz · 3.1.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Brain structures from the womb: brain stem, thalamus, cerebellum, cortex Quiz · 3.1.3.1.1 · 20 questions