Lesson 3.1.1.2.3
3.1.1.2.3 Primacy and recency effects and the serial position effect Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.1.1.2.3, Primacy and recency effects and the serial position effect: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE Psychology (8182), Unit 1: Memory, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is the serial position effect?
- The tendency to forget items presented at the start of a list very quickly after they appear
- The tendency to recall items at the start and end of a list better than items in the middle
- The tendency to recall items in the same order in which they were presented to the learner
- The tendency to recall items in the middle of a list better than those at its start or end
-
What is the primacy effect?
- Better recall of items in the middle of a list, because they receive the most rehearsal
- Better recall of the first items in a list, because they are transferred into long-term memory
- Better recall of the last items in a list, because they are still held in short-term memory
- Poorer recall of the first items in a list, because attention is spread across the whole list
-
What is the recency effect?
- Better recall of the last items in a list, because they are still held in short-term memory
- Better recall of items in the middle of a list, because they are repeated most often
- Poorer recall of the last items in a list, because they interfere with the earlier items
- Better recall of the first items in a list, because they are transferred into long-term memory
-
Which store is most associated with the recency effect?
- Sensory memory, because the last items are still held as an exact copy of the input
- Short-term memory, because the last items are still held there when recall begins
- Long-term memory, because the last items are transferred there in the final seconds
- Working memory, because the last items are manipulated more than the first items in the list
-
Which store is most associated with the primacy effect?
- Long-term memory, because early items have had more time to be rehearsed and transferred
- Working memory, because early items are used to process the later items in the list
- Sensory memory, because early items are held as an exact copy of the input for longer
- Short-term memory, because early items are still held there when recall begins
-
A 20-word list is recalled best at the first and last words. Which two effects are shown?
- Recency for the middle words and primacy for the last words in the list
- Primacy for the first words and recency for the last words
- Primacy for the middle words and recency for the first words in the list
- Recency for the first words and primacy for the last words in the same list
-
A participant recalls the start and end of a 12-word list well, but the middle poorly. What pattern is this?
- A U-shaped serial position curve, showing both primacy and recency
- A straight line showing equal recall at every position in the list presented
- An inverted pattern showing that only the items in the middle of the list are recalled
- A steadily falling line showing that recall gets worse with each word as the list goes on
-
A list is followed by 30 seconds of counting backwards before recall. What is predicted for the recency effect?
- Recency is reduced, because the delay clears the last items from short-term memory
- Recency is unchanged, because the counting only affects the first items in the list
- Recency is removed and primacy grows, because counting moves early items into sensory memory
- Recency is increased, because the counting rehearses the last items in short-term memory
-
A learner remembers the first three names at a meeting and the last two, but not the middle ones. Which effects explain this?
- Recency explains every name, because the most recent names are rehearsed the most
- Primacy explains the middle names and recency explains the first three names
- Primacy explains the first three names and recency explains the last two names
- Recency explains the first three names and primacy explains the last two names
-
Why might the first words in a list be recalled better than the middle words?
- They have been coded as images, which are easier to recall than words in a list
- They have had more rehearsal and more time to be transferred into long-term memory
- They were attended to less, so they stayed in short-term memory for longer than other items
- They are held longer in sensory memory, which is an exact copy and does not fade
-
Why is the recency effect usually reduced when a new task is given after a list?
- Because the last items have been coded semantically, so they can no longer be recalled
- Because the last items have been transferred to long-term memory during the new task
- Because the last items have decayed in sensory memory while the new task is being done
- Because the last items have been displaced from short-term memory by the new task
-
Which prediction best matches the multi-store model for recall of early items in a list?
- Early items should be recalled poorly because they were displaced by later items in the list
- Early items should be recalled best of all because they are held in sensory memory until recall
- Early items should be recalled equally with middle items because all items get the same rehearsal
- Early items should be recalled well because they have had time to be rehearsed and transferred into long-term memory
-
Which finding would be most consistent with the recency effect coming from short-term memory?
- Recency disappears after a long delay filled with a task that uses up short-term memory
- Primacy disappears after a long delay, while recency is always stronger than primacy
- A U-shaped curve appears in recall of a list presented with no delay at all
- Recency persists unchanged after a long delay filled with an unrelated task that uses short-term memory
-
A recall test asks participants to recall a list in any order. What does the serial position curve show?
- How many times each item was repeated during the learning phase of the test
- How often items from each position in the list are recalled
- How much attention the learner gave to each item during the presentation of the list
- How long each item was held in the short-term store before it was lost
-
A learner forgets the 9th word of a 20-word list but remembers the 19th. Which explanation fits?
- The serial position effect, because items near the end are recalled better than items in the middle
- The primacy effect, because items at the start of the list are the ones recalled best
- Sensory memory decay, because items in the middle of the list fade within a second
- Interference, because later items in the list replace the earlier items in memory
-
A learner rehearses only the first few items of a 15-item list. Which result is most likely?
- Those early items will be recalled strongly, while the middle items are recalled poorly
- The last items will be recalled best, because rehearsal only affects the most recent items
- Those early items will be lost, because rehearsal removes items from long-term memory
- All items will be recalled equally well, because rehearsal spreads memory evenly over the list
-
Which procedure change would most reduce the primacy effect in a recall test?
- Testing recall immediately after the last item, so that the final items are fully retained
- Reading the list aloud more slowly so that all items get equal attention from the learner
- Removing the time for rehearsal of early items, so they are not transferred to long-term memory
- Adding more time for rehearsal of the early items before recall begins in the test
-
Which statement correctly links the primacy effect to rehearsal?
- Early items get more rehearsal, so they are more likely to be lost from short-term memory
- Early items get no rehearsal, so they are recalled from the sensory store as an exact copy
- Early items get more rehearsal, so they are more likely to be transferred into long-term memory
- Early items get less rehearsal, so they are more likely to be lost from sensory memory
-
Which statement about the serial position curve is correct?
- It shows recall as a steady rise, with the best recall at the very end of the list
- It shows recall as a U-shape, with better recall at the start and end than in the middle
- It shows recall as an upside-down U, with the best recall in the middle of the list
- It shows recall as a straight line, because all items are recalled with equal accuracy
-
Which result would count against the idea that recency comes from short-term memory alone?
- Primacy that disappears after a long delay, as the model predicts for early items in a list
- Recency that disappears after a short delay with counting backwards, as the model predicts
- A U-shaped curve in recall of a list presented with no delay between items or recall
- Recency that survives a long delay filled with an unrelated task, which the model would not predict
Related quizzes
- Encoding, storage and retrieval: how memories are encoded and stored Quiz · 3.1.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Episodic, semantic and procedural memory Quiz · 3.1.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Multi-store model: sensory, short-term and long-term memory Quiz · 3.1.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Coding, capacity and duration of each memory store Quiz · 3.1.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Murdock's serial position curve study Quiz · 3.1.1.2.4 · 20 questions
- Theory of Reconstructive Memory and effort after meaning Quiz · 3.1.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study Quiz · 3.1.1.3.2 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting accuracy of memory: interference, context, false memories Quiz · 3.1.1.3.3 · 20 questions
- Difference between sensation and perception Quiz · 3.1.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Brain structures from the womb: brain stem, thalamus, cerebellum, cortex Quiz · 3.1.3.1.1 · 20 questions