Lesson 4.3.6.1
4.3.6.1 Explanations for food preferences Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.3.6.1, Explanations for food preferences: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Psychology (7182), Unit 3: Issues and options in Psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is neophobia in the context of food preferences?
- A preference for familiar foods that is produced by repeated exposure in childhood, and which stays fixed for the whole of adult life
- A strong liking for sweet foods that is present from birth in all humans, and which is usually stronger in young children than in adults
- A learned association between eating a food and feeling unwell afterwards, which usually develops over many meals rather than in one episode
- A fear or avoidance of unfamiliar foods, which is thought to have protected early humans from poisonous substances
-
What is taste aversion?
- An innate dislike of bitter tastes that all humans show from infancy onwards
- A reduced ability to detect sweet flavours caused by hormonal changes in adults
- A preference for foods that a person has eaten frequently in their own culture
- A learned avoidance of a food after it has been paired with nausea or illness
-
Which explanation of food preferences proposes that preferences evolved because they helped survival?
- The social learning explanation
- The cultural transmission explanation
- The evolutionary explanation
- The operant conditioning explanation
-
Which factor is part of the learning explanation of food preferences?
- Inherited sensitivity to bitter compounds in the tongue
- Changes in the level of ghrelin released before breakfast
- Social influence, such as eating the same foods as family or peers
- Reduced activity in the hypothalamus following a meal
-
A toddler refuses to try broccoli at first but later accepts it after seeing a parent eat it several times. Which explanation best accounts for this change?
- A genetic mutation that changes taste receptors during the second year of life
- An innate taste aversion that has been removed by the child's gradual growth
- A hormonal change caused by leptin rising after a meal is eaten
- Social learning through modelling, with repeated exposure reducing neophobia
-
A person becomes ill after eating shellfish and afterwards avoids all shellfish. Which process best explains this avoidance?
- Cultural norms that teach people to avoid shellfish for religious reasons
- Taste aversion, through the association of the food with illness
- Neophobia, since the person has never eaten shellfish before this event
- Social learning through observation of a family member avoiding shellfish
-
A study finds that children who grow up in households where a specific vegetable is eaten daily prefer that vegetable more than children from homes where it is never eaten. Which explanation is best supported?
- The evolutionary explanation, since the children share the same ancestral food history
- Taste aversion, since the children have been made ill by the vegetable in the past
- The role of learning, through repeated exposure and social influence within the household
- Neophobia, since the children are more fearful of the vegetable in the second household
-
Which feature of the evolutionary explanation makes it difficult to test directly?
- It can only be tested using animals that have no social contact with humans
- It assumes that food preferences are learned only through classical conditioning in adults
- It requires that all participants be given the same food at the same time each day
- It relies on inferring past selection pressures, which cannot be observed or replicated in the present
-
Which evidence would most support the view that food preferences are partly learned rather than purely innate?
- Neophobia is shown to be stronger in older adults than in young children
- Preferences for a food change after people experience it repeatedly in a new social setting
- Taste receptors are found to differ between individuals from different countries
- Newborn infants show the same preference for a food in every culture studied
-
A researcher argues that cultural norms about eating are only learned. Which criticism of this view is most appropriate?
- Some food avoidances, such as taste aversion, can follow a single pairing with illness, which hints at biological preparedness
- Cultural norms are inherited through genes passed directly from parent to child, so that they are fixed at birth and cannot be changed later on
- Taste aversion has been shown to depend on reinforcement from the social group, so people avoid foods only when their peers are watching them eat
- Learning theory states that food preferences cannot be changed once they are formed, so people keep the same tastes throughout their entire lives
-
Which statement best describes the role of neophobia in the evolutionary explanation?
- It is caused by a hormone that makes all foods taste identical to the eater
- It only occurs in adults and never in children, so it has no adaptive value in childhood
- It makes early humans cautious about new foods, reducing the risk of eating something poisonous
- It causes early humans to seek out novel foods so that they gain more nutrients from each meal
-
A group of adults is asked to rate a novel food after one, five and ten exposures. Their ratings rise steadily. Which explanation is best supported?
- The food is becoming less toxic each time it is presented to the participants
- Repeated exposure reduces neophobia and increases liking, which fits a learning account
- Leptin levels are rising across the exposures and making the food taste sweeter
- Taste aversion is being reinforced by the ratings participants give the food
-
Which evaluation point applies to explanations of food preferences that rely only on evolution?
- They explain cultural differences perfectly, but cannot explain individual variation
- They cannot easily explain cultural differences in what people eat within the same species
- They predict that all food preferences will change within a single generation
- They provide a complete account, leaving no role for learning or social influence
-
Why do learning explanations of food preferences emphasise social and cultural influences?
- Because cultural influences only affect people who have experienced taste aversion
- Because social influences change the genes that code for taste receptors in each person
- Because people acquire food preferences by observing and imitating the eating behaviour of those around them
- Because social influences prevent the body from producing ghrelin before meals
-
A child who has been ill after eating a food stops eating it, even when told it is safe. Which explanation best accounts for the continued avoidance?
- Social learning, since the child has observed a sibling refusing the food
- Cultural norms, since the family has a rule against the food for all members
- Taste aversion, which can persist because the learned association is strong after a single illness
- Neophobia, since the child is trying a new food for the first time after the illness
-
An evaluator says the evolutionary explanation of food preferences is supported by cross-species evidence. Which evidence would be most relevant?
- Some animal species have learned to eat foods through human cooking techniques, which shows that eating patterns are driven by culture rather than by evolution
- Many animal species avoid unfamiliar or potentially toxic foods, suggesting an adaptive basis for caution
- Humans in different cultures eat a wide range of foods from their local environment, which shows that food choice is entirely independent of ancestral pressures
- Many animals show no preference for food at all and eat whatever is available, which shows that evolution has never influenced eating behaviour in any way
-
Which conclusion best integrates the evolutionary and learning explanations of food preferences?
- Learning explanations are entirely correct and evolution has no role in food preferences, because all preferences are shaped by social exposure in childhood only
- Food preferences are random and cannot be explained by either evolution or learning, so no theory can account for the foods people choose across cultures
- Biological predispositions such as neophobia may shape what is learned, while social and cultural experience determines specific preferences
- Evolutionary explanations are entirely correct and learning has no role in food preferences, because all tastes are fixed by natural selection from birth onwards
-
A health worker wants to reduce a child's fear of a new vegetable. Which strategy is most consistent with the learning explanation?
- Hiding the vegetable within other foods so the child does not notice it at all
- Insisting that the child eats a large portion of the vegetable at a single meal
- Offering the vegetable only after the child has been ill with a stomach upset
- Repeated, low-pressure exposure to the vegetable alongside a trusted adult who eats it
-
Which finding would challenge the claim that taste aversion is always learned from a single bad experience?
- People tend to avoid foods that were paired with unpleasant smells during a previous illness
- People show stronger aversions when the nausea occurs soon after eating the food
- People sometimes avoid foods they have never eaten and have no association with illness
- People often avoid foods that made them ill after several separate episodes of sickness
-
Which finding best supports the view that food preferences develop partly through exposure rather than being fixed at birth?
- Adults show no change in food liking after exposure, which proves that preferences are set before the age of two
- Newborn infants show a fixed preference for the same vegetable in every culture studied, regardless of later exposure
- Children's liking for a vegetable increases after repeated tasting sessions in which the food is offered without pressure
- Children's liking for a vegetable decreases each time they taste it, because the taste becomes more unpleasant over time
Related quizzes
- Gender and culture: universality and bias Quiz · 4.3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Free will and determinism Quiz · 4.3.1.2 · 20 questions
- The nature-nurture debate Quiz · 4.3.1.3 · 20 questions
- Holism and reductionism Quiz · 4.3.1.4 · 20 questions
- Idiographic and nomothetic approaches Quiz · 4.3.1.5 · 20 questions
- Social sensitivity in psychological research Quiz · 4.3.1.6 · 20 questions
- Attraction in romantic relationships Quiz · 4.3.2.1 · 20 questions
- Theories of romantic relationships and relationship breakdown Quiz · 4.3.2.2 · 20 questions
- Online and parasocial relationships Quiz · 4.3.2.3 · 20 questions
- Chromosomes, hormones and diversity in sex development Quiz · 4.3.3.1 · 20 questions