Lesson 4.3.5.4
4.3.5.4 The interactionist approach and the diathesis-stress model Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.3.5.4, The interactionist approach and the diathesis-stress model: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Psychology (7182), Unit 3: Issues and options in Psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
In the diathesis-stress model, what does the diathesis refer to?
- A stressful life event that directly causes the first hallucinations in adulthood
- An inherited or biological predisposition that makes a person vulnerable to schizophrenia
- A learned pattern of avoidance behaviour acquired during childhood
- The drug dose needed to suppress positive symptoms in adult patients
-
What does the stress component of the diathesis-stress model refer to?
- The side effects produced by atypical antipsychotic medication in patients
- The genetic code passed from parent to child without any modification over generations
- Raised dopamine levels in the striatum when a person is at rest
- Environmental triggers, such as life events or family pressures, that bring out the symptoms
-
Which term describes an approach that sees nature and nurture interacting to cause schizophrenia?
- The psychodynamic approach
- The behaviourist approach
- The interactionist approach
- The biological reductionist approach
-
Why is the diathesis-stress model described as interactionist?
- It proposes that social learning alone explains why schizophrenia develops in adults
- It proposes that a predisposition and environmental stress together determine whether schizophrenia develops
- It proposes that a dopamine imbalance alone causes schizophrenia to develop at any age
- It proposes that genes alone fully determine whether schizophrenia develops in a person
-
According to the diathesis-stress model, when is a person most likely to develop schizophrenia?
- When they take typical antipsychotic drugs for a long period of time
- When a strong predisposition meets enough environmental stress to pass their vulnerability threshold
- When they have no genetic relatives who have ever been diagnosed with the disorder
- When their dopamine levels are at their lowest point in the course of a day
-
Which statement best describes a limitation of the diathesis-stress model?
- It ignores any role for inherited vulnerability in the development of schizophrenia altogether
- It claims that stress alone is always sufficient to cause schizophrenia in adults
- It has shown that stress reduction alone cures schizophrenia in most patients who are treated
- It does not specify precisely how much stress is needed to trigger schizophrenia in a particular person
-
Which treatment is consistent with an interactionist view of schizophrenia?
- Removing all environmental stressors and withholding all medication from the patient
- Using aversion therapy to suppress hallucinations and delusions directly in patients
- Relying only on surgical reduction of neural activity in the brain of the patient
- Combining antipsychotic drugs with cognitive behaviour therapy or family therapy
-
Ravi has a strong family history of schizophrenia but lives in a low-stress environment and has shown no symptoms. Which interpretation best fits the diathesis-stress model?
- Low stress proves that he has no predisposition whatsoever to the disorder
- Without enough stress to exceed his threshold, the predisposition may never produce symptoms
- The model predicts he will definitely develop symptoms before the age of eighteen
- His genes have been shown to be irrelevant to his risk of developing schizophrenia
-
A patient's symptoms worsened after a bereavement, although she had no earlier diagnosis. Which explanation fits the diathesis-stress model?
- Bereavement reduces dopamine activity and so always produces delusions in adults
- Her symptoms prove the disorder is entirely learned through observing others
- The bereavement must have caused a permanent genetic mutation in her neurons
- The bereavement may have acted as a stressor that triggered an existing vulnerability
-
Identical twins share their genes, but only one develops schizophrenia. Which feature of the interactionist approach best explains this?
- The twin who develops the disorder must have a dopamine receptor the other does not
- The genes must have differed at conception even though the twins are identical
- Identical twins always develop the same mental disorder, so the difference must be measurement error
- Differences in environmental stress and experiences can lead to different outcomes despite shared genes
-
A clinician wants a treatment that addresses both biological vulnerability and life stress in schizophrenia. Which combination is most consistent with the interactionist approach?
- Medication alone, since environmental stress has no role in the course of the disorder
- Aversion therapy alone to unlearn any link between stress and the symptoms
- Family therapy alone, since biology has no role in the course of the disorder
- Antipsychotic medication alongside family therapy to reduce stress within the household
-
Concordance for schizophrenia is higher in MZ twins than in DZ twins but well below 100% in MZ twins. Which conclusion is best supported?
- Schizophrenia is caused entirely by the environment, with genes playing no role at all
- Schizophrenia is determined entirely by genes, so the environment has no effect whatsoever
- Genetic factors contribute to risk, but environmental factors must also contribute to whether the disorder develops
- The concordance difference shows that MZ twins are always exposed to more stress than DZ twins
-
In a study, people with high vulnerability scores reported schizophrenia-like experiences only when they also reported high recent life stress. What does this pattern most directly support?
- A conclusion that the measures are unreliable because both factors were involved
- A main effect of predisposition alone, with stress making no difference to outcomes
- A main effect of stress alone, with the predisposition making no difference to outcomes
- An interaction between predisposition and stress, as the diathesis-stress model predicts
-
A family therapy programme reduces hostile criticism in the home for a patient who also takes antipsychotics. Which model predicts a lower risk of relapse?
- The diathesis-stress model, since reducing a stressor can lower the chance of symptoms breaking through
- The ethological model, since family conflict only affects non-human animals in the wild
- The biological reductionist model alone, since stress is not linked to symptoms at all
- The dopamine hypothesis alone, since family environment has no effect on dopamine activity
-
A patient has a high diathesis. Which change would the diathesis-stress model predict to reduce the likelihood of symptoms?
- Lowering the level of environmental stress the patient experiences in daily life
- Increasing the hours spent in unstructured and unsupervised activity each day
- Ensuring the patient has no contact with any family members whatsoever
- Increasing the dose of stimulant drugs that raise dopamine activity in the brain
-
Which argument best evaluates the diathesis-stress model against a purely biological explanation of schizophrenia?
- It removes the need for biological evidence, since environment is the only real cause
- It accounts for why not everyone with a genetic risk develops the disorder, which genetics alone cannot explain
- It shows schizophrenia can be cured by reducing life stress without any medication at all
- It proves genetic explanations are wrong, since stress is always more important than genes
-
Why is the diathesis-stress model difficult to test?
- Predisposition and stress are both hard to measure precisely, so the threshold at which they interact is hard to specify
- The model makes only one prediction, and every study has always confirmed it in full, with no exceptions across any population tested
- The model is based on a single controlled experiment with a very large sample, which means its findings can be applied without any reservation
- The model relies only on case studies of people with no family history of the disorder, so its claims cannot be generalised to anyone else
-
A patient is more likely to relapse in a home with high expressed emotion. Which argument best supports adding family therapy to medication under the diathesis-stress model?
- Family therapy has no effect on symptoms, so medication is the only useful intervention available and the home environment can be ignored safely
- Family therapy changes the patient's genes so that medication is no longer needed at all, and the vulnerability is removed permanently for life
- Family therapy lowers a stressor that could push a predisposed patient over their threshold, and medication treats the vulnerability
- Family therapy only works for patients who have no biological vulnerability to the disorder, so it is rarely useful in any clinical setting at all
-
Why might a given amount of stress be more powerful for someone with a high diathesis than for someone with a low diathesis?
- A person with a high diathesis has a lower threshold, so a smaller amount of stress can be enough to produce symptoms
- A person with a low diathesis is more sensitive to stress than someone with a high diathesis, because their threshold is always lower in general
- A person with a high diathesis has no threshold at all, so stress always has the same effect on them whatever their genetic predisposition is
- Stress has no effect on people with genetic predispositions, so their threshold is irrelevant to whether symptoms appear over time in practice
-
A study finds that a predisposition measure predicts schizophrenia onset only in adults who experienced childhood adversity. Which conclusion best reflects the interactionist basis of the diathesis-stress model?
- Childhood adversity alone is sufficient, so the predisposition measure must be invalid
- Adversity causes the predisposition, so only adversity needs to be targeted in treatment
- The predisposition measure is the sole cause, and adversity has no effect on onset
- Predisposition and adversity jointly increase risk, so neither factor alone fully accounts for onset
Related quizzes
- Gender and culture: universality and bias Quiz · 4.3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Free will and determinism Quiz · 4.3.1.2 · 20 questions
- The nature-nurture debate Quiz · 4.3.1.3 · 20 questions
- Holism and reductionism Quiz · 4.3.1.4 · 20 questions
- Idiographic and nomothetic approaches Quiz · 4.3.1.5 · 20 questions
- Social sensitivity in psychological research Quiz · 4.3.1.6 · 20 questions
- Attraction in romantic relationships Quiz · 4.3.2.1 · 20 questions
- Theories of romantic relationships and relationship breakdown Quiz · 4.3.2.2 · 20 questions
- Online and parasocial relationships Quiz · 4.3.2.3 · 20 questions
- Chromosomes, hormones and diversity in sex development Quiz · 4.3.3.1 · 20 questions