Lesson 3.2.1.6
3.2.1.6 Political parties Quiz: AQA Politics, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.1.6, Political parties: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Politics (7152), Unit 2: Government and politics of the USA and comparative politics, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What does factionalism within a US political party refer to?
- A formal legal split in which a party is officially registered as two separate parties
- The practice of a party nominating candidates from several states for one national office, settled by a single convention vote
- A rule requiring every party member in Congress to vote together on every bill
- Divisions within a party between rival groups with different priorities or ideological positions
-
What is meant by a third party in US politics?
- A party formed by combining the Democrats and Republicans for a single election
- A coalition of state parties that nominates a single national candidate every four years
- A party other than the Democrats and Republicans that may stand candidates but rarely wins national office
- A party that controls the Senate while the Democrats control the House of Representatives
-
What is an independent candidate?
- A candidate endorsed by both major parties at the same time for a single federal office
- A candidate who stands for election without the nomination of a major party
- A candidate chosen directly by delegates to a national convention from a single state
- A candidate who must resign from their party before the general election campaign begins
-
Which statement best describes the broad ideology of the modern Democratic Party?
- Generally associated with a more liberal, interventionist view of government, including social welfare and regulation
- Generally associated with limited government, low taxation and a minimal federal role in the economy
- Generally associated with strong states' rights and a reduced federal role in social welfare programmes
- Generally associated with a rejection of all government regulation of business and the free market
-
What is meant by party polarisation in the US?
- Parties have merged their policy positions so that few meaningful differences now remain between them
- Parties now select their candidates through national referendums rather than conventions or primaries
- Parties have moved further apart ideologically, so there is less overlap between the positions of their members and voters
- Parties have grown in size as large numbers of voters have registered as formal members
-
What is the role of a party's national committee in the US?
- It sets the rules for federal elections, which are fixed by the state legislatures
- It approves every bill proposed by members of the House of Representatives before a vote
- It appoints the justices of the Supreme Court in consultation with the President
- It coordinates campaigns, fundraising and party organisation across states
-
Which development is most often linked to a decline in US party influence?
- The abolition of primaries, which has forced all candidates to be selected by party leaders
- The growth of single-party states, in which one party controls every level of government
- Candidate-centred campaigns, primaries and social media allow candidates to build support without party machinery
- The introduction of compulsory membership, which requires all voters to register with one party
-
Which factor helps explain the dominance of two parties in US politics?
- Single-member districts with first-past-the-post voting penalise third parties that cannot win seats
- Each state uses a separate party system, so the two largest parties dominate by constitutional design
- Proportional representation is used for every federal election, which favours the two largest parties
- Federal law limits ballot access to two parties in every state and in every election
-
A third-party candidate wins 10% of the national vote but no electoral votes. What best explains this?
- Electoral votes are allocated nationally by proportional representation, so the candidate is excluded
- Votes for third parties are automatically transferred to the Democrats under the Electoral College system
- Federal law bars third-party candidates from receiving votes in more than five states
- Support is spread across many states, so the candidate does not win a plurality in any one state
-
Why might a political party be described as having weak internal organisation?
- Primaries let candidates win nomination without relying on party machines, reducing the party's control over selection
- Parties are banned from endorsing candidates in primaries, which means they cannot influence selection
- Parties fund all party-line voting directly, so local organisations have no decision-making role
- Parties hold no national conventions, so candidates must draft their own platforms independently
-
Which argument best supports the view that US parties are being renewed rather than declining?
- Parties adapt their policies and campaigns to attract new demographic groups and changing voter coalitions
- Parties have abandoned all policy positions, so they now compete only on personalities and celebrity endorsements
- Parties have ceased fundraising altogether, relying entirely on individual donations from independent candidates
- Parties have been formally merged by federal law, giving the national committees control over every nomination
-
Why do third parties and independent candidates struggle to win federal office in the US?
- Federal law prevents independent candidates from appearing on any ballot in a presidential election
- Independent candidates are barred from debating, which means they cannot reach voters in any state
- Third-party candidates are required to be members of a major party before they can stand for office
- Ballot access rules, funding gaps and winner-takes-all rules make it hard to win seats despite some public support
-
Which argument best supports the claim that two-party dominance persists despite voter dissatisfaction?
- Voters are legally required to choose between the two main parties on every federal ballot paper, enforced by federal election law
- Both large coalitions and institutional barriers make it hard for third parties to win, even when many voters dislike the main parties
- Dissatisfied voters are automatically assigned to the party whose candidate they least oppose
- The Supreme Court has ruled that third parties may not appear on any official ballot paper
-
Which factor makes the Democratic and Republican parties more ideologically distinct than in earlier decades?
- The introduction of federal funding for every party, which has removed the need for policy differences
- The abolition of the party convention, which has allowed candidates to adopt any policy they choose
- A legal requirement that parties adopt identical platforms, which has reduced the scope of debate
- The sorting of voters and activists so that ideological positions on many issues align more closely with party identity
-
What is a principal consequence of internal party divisions for a governing party in Congress?
- Factions may vote against leadership priorities, making it harder to pass a unified legislative programme
- Factions automatically strengthen leadership control, so every bill passes without debate, amendment or any real opposition
- Factions are required by law to submit all proposals to the Supreme Court before a vote is held
- Factions ensure that no member of Congress ever votes against their own party on any issue
-
Which best describes the Republican Party's traditional ideological emphasis?
- Expansion of the welfare state, progressive taxation and extensive federal regulation of the economy
- Limited government, lower taxation, individual responsibility and a strong role in national defence
- Nationalisation of major industries, central planning of the economy and collective ownership of land
- Abolition of the federal government in favour of direct democracy managed by independent local councils
-
What is meant by 'party renewal' in the context of US parties?
- Parties adapting their organisation, policies and coalitions to remain electorally competitive
- Parties merging their membership lists so that voters need register with only one organisation
- Parties receiving a fixed federal grant every four years to fund the selection of presidential candidates
- Parties abolishing their national conventions to give candidates total control over campaigns
-
Why are Democratic and Republican internal divisions significant for presidential nominations?
- Factions are required to approve every nominee in the Senate before the convention may begin
- Factions can only affect the vice-presidential choice, since presidential candidates are fixed in advance by the national committee
- Factions have no influence on nominations, because all party decisions are made by federal law
- Factions can influence primary contests and platforms, shaping which candidates and policies gain party support
-
Which statement best describes the main US party organisations at state level?
- State parties have no legal existence and are banned from raising funds for any candidate in their state
- State parties run registration drives, fundraising and campaigns, and they operate alongside national committees
- State parties are controlled entirely by the national committee, which appoints every local official
- State parties are required to merge into one national organisation before each presidential election under federal party rules
-
Which factor is most often cited as reducing the cohesion of US party organisations?
- The rise of candidate-centred campaigns and independent fundraising, which reduce reliance on party resources
- The creation of a single federal party that replaced both the Democrats and the Republicans nationally
- The strict requirement that all candidates swear a loyalty oath to their party before entering any primary or caucus contest
- The removal of all party labels from ballot papers at federal and state level since the early 2000s
Related quizzes
- The constitutional framework of US government Quiz · 3.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- The legislative branch: Congress Quiz · 3.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- The executive branch: sources and constraints of presidential power Quiz · 3.2.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- The executive branch: Imperial versus Imperilled Presidency Quiz · 3.2.1.3.2 · 20 questions
- The judicial branch: selection and role of the Supreme Court Quiz · 3.2.1.4.1 · 20 questions
- The judicial branch: judicial review and landmark rulings Quiz · 3.2.1.4.2 · 20 questions
- The electoral process: candidate selection and electoral outcomes Quiz · 3.2.1.5.1 · 20 questions
- Direct democracy and voting behaviour in the USA Quiz · 3.2.1.5.2 · 20 questions
- Pressure groups Quiz · 3.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- Civil rights Quiz · 3.2.1.8 · 20 questions