Lesson 3.2.1.3.2
3.2.1.3.2 The executive branch: Imperial versus Imperilled Presidency Quiz: AQA Politics, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.1.3.2, The executive branch: Imperial versus Imperilled Presidency: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Politics (7152), Unit 2: Government and politics of the USA and comparative politics, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is meant by the term 'imperial presidency'?
- A view that the President must be selected by the Supreme Court in every election
- A view that the President is restricted to ceremonial duties at home and abroad
- A view that the President should have no powers, because Congress makes all decisions
- A view that presidential power has grown to dominate the other branches of government
-
What is meant by the term 'imperilled presidency'?
- A view that the President is directly elected by the Supreme Court in each state
- A view that the President has become a monarch with powers similar to a royal ruler
- A view that the presidency is weakened by constraints, such as divided government
- A view that the President is removed from office in every term by a Senate vote
-
What does the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 illustrate about presidential power?
- A President is legally forbidden from making any decisions during a crisis of this kind
- A President can use crisis powers to act decisively in foreign policy, showing the scope of executive authority
- A President must obtain the approval of the Supreme Court before any military action is taken
- A President cannot act in a foreign crisis without a full declaration of war from Congress
-
Which factor is most likely to weaken a President's ability to exercise power?
- A large number of executive orders issued in a single year by the President
- A high level of public approval, which removes all constraints on the President
- Opposition control of Congress, which can block legislation and appointments
- Strong support in Congress from the President's own party, which leads to gridlock
-
Which factor is most likely to strengthen a President's power over Congress?
- Opposition control of both houses, which allows the President to pass bills alone
- A decision by the Supreme Court to limit the President's veto power in all cases
- An increase in the number of federal agencies, which reduces the power of the President
- Majority support from the President's party in both houses of Congress
-
Which example is commonly cited to illustrate the waxing of presidential power?
- The defeat of the President's legislative programme by a hostile Congress in every term
- The removal of all executive staff from the White House by a vote of the Senate
- The expansion of the Executive Office of the President under Franklin D. Roosevelt
- The loss of the power to veto legislation under the Twenty-second Amendment
-
Which example is often cited to illustrate the waning of presidential power?
- A President's success in passing every major bill with a large majority in both houses
- A President's decision to dissolve Congress and call new elections on a whim
- Conflict with a Congress controlled by the opposition party, which limits a President's programmes
- A President's ability to appoint all federal judges without any Senate involvement
-
Which statement best describes the debate about the imperial versus imperilled presidency?
- It concerns whether presidential power has grown too far
- It concerns whether states should have their own presidents with equal powers
- It concerns whether the Supreme Court should appoint the President in every election
- It concerns whether the President should be replaced by a council of ministers
-
Which evaluation best supports the view that the presidency has become more imperial?
- Growing executive agencies have reduced the role of the President to a purely symbolic one
- Growing use of the Senate's advice role has ended all presidential initiative in policy
- Growing use of executive orders can allow presidents to act with less congressional input
- Growing use of executive orders has shown that Presidents have no real power over policy at all
-
Which evaluation best supports the view that the presidency has become more imperilled?
- Divided government, polarisation and public distrust can make it harder for presidents to achieve their programmes
- Polarisation has ended all disagreements between the parties, which has strengthened the President
- Public distrust has made presidents more powerful, because citizens rely on the President alone
- Divided government has allowed the President to rule without any opposition in Congress
-
Why is the Cuban missile crisis used in debates about the imperial presidency?
- It shows that the Supreme Court decided every military decision taken during the crisis
- It shows that the crisis ended the presidency and led to a constitutional amendment
- It shows how a President's crisis decisions can dominate foreign policy
- It shows that Congress made every decision during the crisis without any role for the President
-
Which argument best supports the view that presidential power depends on relationships with other institutions?
- The President's power depends only on the number of states that vote for them in each election
- The President's power depends only on the President's personal wealth and private business interests
- The President's power is entirely independent of all other institutions, which never affect it
- The President's influence varies with relations with Congress, the courts, the cabinet
-
Which statement about the constraints on presidential power is most accurate?
- Constraints come only from state governors, who can veto any presidential decision in their state
- Constraints do not exist because the Constitution gives the President unlimited power in all areas
- Constraints can come from formal checks, party support, the Supreme Court, the media and public opinion
- Constraints can come only from the Supreme Court, because it is the only body that can limit presidents
-
Which evaluation best assesses the imperial and imperilled debate?
- The debate is irrelevant because presidential power has never changed since the Constitution was adopted
- The debate has a single answer because the Constitution fixes presidential power in every period
- The balance depends on the President, the party control of Congress and the political context, so the debate has no single answer
- The debate can be settled by the monarch, who decides whether the presidency is imperial or imperilled
-
Which combination best describes the sources of presidential power?
- Formal powers from the Bill of Rights and informal powers from the state governors
- Formal powers from the Supreme Court and informal powers from the House of Representatives
- Formal powers from Article II and informal powers such as party leadership and agenda setting
- Formal powers from the Twenty-second Amendment and informal powers from the Federal Reserve
-
What does the term 'waxing and waning' of presidential power describe?
- A permanent increase in presidential power that the courts have never reviewed
- A rule that presidents must leave office at the end of every term without exception
- Changes in presidential influence over time, depending on circumstances
- A constitutional amendment that limits the President to a single term of office
-
Which argument supports the view that the presidency has been imperilled by public distrust?
- Public distrust means the Senate must approve every executive order by a majority vote
- Low public trust can reduce a President's ability to build support
- Public distrust increases the number of executive orders that a President can issue
- High public trust removes all constraints on the presidency, which becomes unlimited
-
Which factor is most likely to support the imperial view of the presidency?
- Unilateral action through executive orders that bypasses Congress
- A President whose party controls neither chamber of Congress for an entire term
- Constant defeats of the President's legislation in a divided Congress
- A Supreme Court that strikes down most executive actions as unconstitutional
-
Which description best matches the Cuban missile crisis as an example in the imperial presidency debate?
- A crisis in which Congress declared war and the President had no role in decisions
- A crisis in which state governors took command of the armed forces to resolve the dispute
- A crisis in which the President's decisions dominated foreign policy
- A crisis in which the Supreme Court took control of military decisions from the President
-
Which argument best supports the claim that presidential power depends on the President's political skill?
- Presidential power depends only on the number of years the President has served in Congress
- Presidential power depends only on the number of electoral votes won in the previous election
- Presidential power is fixed by the Constitution, so political skill makes no difference at all
- Skilful persuasion, party relations and public support can enlarge a President's influence
Related quizzes
- The constitutional framework of US government Quiz · 3.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- The legislative branch: Congress Quiz · 3.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- The executive branch: sources and constraints of presidential power Quiz · 3.2.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- The judicial branch: selection and role of the Supreme Court Quiz · 3.2.1.4.1 · 20 questions
- The judicial branch: judicial review and landmark rulings Quiz · 3.2.1.4.2 · 20 questions
- The electoral process: candidate selection and electoral outcomes Quiz · 3.2.1.5.1 · 20 questions
- Direct democracy and voting behaviour in the USA Quiz · 3.2.1.5.2 · 20 questions
- Political parties Quiz · 3.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Pressure groups Quiz · 3.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- Civil rights Quiz · 3.2.1.8 · 20 questions