Lesson 3.2.1.7
3.2.1.7 Pressure groups Quiz: AQA Politics, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.1.7, Pressure groups: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Politics (7152), Unit 2: Government and politics of the USA and comparative politics, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is an iron triangle in US politics?
- A stable relationship between a congressional committee, a federal agency and an interest group that benefits from it
- A committee of three senators who negotiate policy between the two major parties
- A group of three pressure groups that compete for control of a single federal agency
- A triangular alliance between the President, the Supreme Court and the House of Representatives
-
What is political pluralism?
- A theory that a single elite group controls government decisions across every policy area
- A model in which political parties alone decide which groups may influence legislation
- A theory that power is dispersed among many competing groups, so no single group dominates policy-making
- A system in which the national government delegates its powers to competing state governments
-
What is a Political Action Committee (PAC)?
- A federal body that sets spending limits for presidential primaries in every state
- An organisation that raises money from members and donates to candidates, subject to limits on direct contributions
- A government agency that approves the campaign spending of pressure groups before elections
- A group that spends unlimited amounts directly in coordination with a candidate's own campaign
-
What distinguishes a Super PAC from a traditional PAC?
- It can raise unlimited sums but cannot make direct contributions to, or coordinate with, candidates
- It is funded by the federal government and can spend without limit on candidate campaigns
- It is restricted to spending on state elections and is not allowed to influence federal contests
- It can donate directly to candidates in unlimited amounts, provided it files a report after the election
-
What is the difference between an insider and an outsider pressure group?
- Insider groups are legally barred from lobbying, whereas outsider groups are permitted to lobby freely
- Insider groups operate only at local level, whereas outsider groups operate only at federal level
- Insider groups are funded by the state, whereas outsider groups are funded only by their members
- Insider groups are regularly consulted by government, while outsider groups lack such access and rely on public campaigns
-
A pressure group is regularly consulted by a Senate committee and has access to policy makers. How is it best classified?
- As a sectional group, because its members are concentrated in a single city or region
- As an outsider group, because it relies mainly on public campaigns to influence legislation
- As an insider group
- As a promotional group, because its main aim is to publicise a cause rather than shape policy
-
Which method is most typically used by outsider groups to influence policy?
- Holding private meetings with committee chairs about draft bills before they are published, to shape them quietly in advance
- Sitting on federal advisory committees that help agencies draft detailed regulations
- Organising public demonstrations and mobilising grassroots supporters to pressure legislators
- Providing paid expert testimony at closed congressional hearings on draft legislation
-
What is meant by pressure groups 'reinforcing incumbency' in US politics?
- Donations to sitting members, who are more likely to win, help groups gain access and influence
- Groups fund only presidential campaigns and never fund congressional campaigns
- Federal law since 2002 bans all donations to incumbent members of Congress from pressure groups, so incumbents rely on voters
- Donations are made mainly to challengers to create more competitive races in each district
-
A group donates heavily to committee members who oversee its industry. Which concept best describes this link?
- An iron triangle, where a committee, an agency and the group sustain a mutually beneficial relationship
- Political pluralism, because the donations spread influence evenly among many competing groups
- A super PAC, because the donations were made without any coordination with the committee members or their staff in Washington
- Proportional representation, because the donations match each group's share of the total vote
-
Which criticism of pluralism is most commonly made?
- Pluralism assigns all policy powers to the federal courts, which excludes pressure groups from every decision in the policy process
- Pluralism is illegal under the Constitution, which forbids the existence of any pressure group
- Pluralism gives too many groups an equal voice, so no decisions can ever be taken by government
- Wealthy and well-organised groups, such as business lobbies, may have disproportionate influence over policy
-
Which best describes the relative power of pressure groups compared with political parties in the US?
- Groups always outweigh parties, because parties have no formal role in selecting candidates or drafting bills
- Parties always outweigh groups, because groups are forbidden from funding or lobbying members of Congress
- Groups and parties have exactly equal power, because the law assigns them identical roles in government
- Groups can gain influence through funding and lobbying, but parties retain agenda control through Congress and nomination
-
What was the main effect of the 2010 Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United?
- It limited the number of PACs that could operate in a single election cycle across the whole country
- It allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums on independent political expenditures
- It banned corporations from donating to any federal candidate in any election from that point
- It required super PACs to disclose their donors only after the election result had been declared
-
Which argument is most commonly made in favour of tighter regulation of PAC and super PAC funding?
- Large donations are needed to pay for printing ballot papers and staffing polling stations in federal elections across the country
- Large donations guarantee that every candidate receives the same amount of funding from groups
- Large donations ensure that pressure groups are no longer able to lobby members of Congress
- Large donations may create undue influence and reduce public trust in how elections are funded
-
A critic argues that pressure group funding of elections undermines representative government. Which is the strongest response?
- Groups are irrelevant to representation, because parties alone decide which candidates receive funds
- Groups may also mobilise citizens and raise issues, so the impact of funding depends on how it is used and disclosed
- Groups must represent every citizen equally, because federal law requires all donations to be equal in amount and in timing
- Groups have no effect on representation, because the Constitution prevents them from influencing any vote
-
Which is the best evaluation of the claim that pressure groups are more powerful than political parties in the US?
- The claim has merit in some policy areas, but parties still control key tools such as nomination and legislative agendas
- The claim is true in every case, because groups alone draft and vote on all federal legislation
- The claim cannot be assessed, because there is no reliable evidence about the influence of groups in politics
- The claim is false in every case, because the Constitution gives parties sole authority over every policy area
-
Which best describes an 'outsider' pressure group in the US?
- A group that is funded by the federal government and sits on advisory boards for every agency
- A group that is legally banned from campaigning on any issue except during presidential elections, which only candidates may contest
- A group that operates only within a single state and never attempts to influence national policy
- A group that lacks routine access to policy makers and seeks influence mainly through public campaigns
-
Which method is an example of 'lobbying' by a pressure group?
- Meeting members of Congress and their staff to present evidence and seek support for a particular bill
- Presenting a petition to the Supreme Court, which is then used to draft new federal statutes
- Organising a national referendum on a policy, which is a power reserved for the federal government and cannot be delegated to groups
- Publishing a complete list of members who voted against a bill, without any contact with legislators
-
What is the core idea behind the term 'promotional group'?
- A group funded by the government to advertise federal policies to citizens in every state
- A group that is formed only to win elections and disbands once its candidates take office
- A group that exists solely to represent the members of one trade union in a single workplace, and disbands once a dispute ends
- A group that seeks to advance a cause or interest, often on behalf of people who are not its members
-
Why might a sectional pressure group have a more concentrated effect on policy than a promotional group?
- Its members are randomly assigned to advocate for the group, so they lack commitment to its aims
- Its members are legally prohibited from contacting government officials about its concerns
- Its members share a direct, material stake in the outcome, which can give it strong incentives to act
- Its members have no common interest, so it must rely on public campaigns to unify its supporters and to win any access at all
-
A group argues that an agency's regulations should be rewritten, and its experts advise the agency directly. Which concept best fits?
- Outsider pressure, where the group relies on protests because it has no access to officials
- Political pluralism, where the group competes with many others but has no direct access to policy
- Super PAC spending, where the group funds independent advertisements without any contact with officials
- Insider access, where the group is regularly consulted and helps shape the policy process
Related quizzes
- The constitutional framework of US government Quiz · 3.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- The legislative branch: Congress Quiz · 3.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- The executive branch: sources and constraints of presidential power Quiz · 3.2.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- The executive branch: Imperial versus Imperilled Presidency Quiz · 3.2.1.3.2 · 20 questions
- The judicial branch: selection and role of the Supreme Court Quiz · 3.2.1.4.1 · 20 questions
- The judicial branch: judicial review and landmark rulings Quiz · 3.2.1.4.2 · 20 questions
- The electoral process: candidate selection and electoral outcomes Quiz · 3.2.1.5.1 · 20 questions
- Direct democracy and voting behaviour in the USA Quiz · 3.2.1.5.2 · 20 questions
- Political parties Quiz · 3.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Civil rights Quiz · 3.2.1.8 · 20 questions