Lesson 3.2.1.5.1
3.2.1.5.1 The electoral process: candidate selection and electoral outcomes Quiz: AQA Politics, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.1.5.1, The electoral process: candidate selection and electoral outcomes: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Politics (7152), Unit 2: Government and politics of the USA and comparative politics, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
How many electoral votes are needed to win the US presidency?
- 270 of the 538 electoral votes
- 51 of the 100 electoral votes
- 300 of the 538 electoral votes
- 218 of the 435 electoral votes
-
What is the Electoral College?
- A committee of the Senate that approves all presidential nominees to federal posts
- A national court that resolves disputes about the results of congressional elections
- A council of state governors that sets the rules for each presidential primary
- The body of electors chosen by the states that formally elects the President
-
What is a primary election in the US?
- A national election in which the President is directly chosen by the popular vote
- A meeting of party members in which delegates are chosen by a show of hands
- A national convention in which the party formally nominates its presidential candidate
- A state-run election in which voters choose candidates for a party's nomination
-
What is a caucus in US candidate selection?
- A vote held by members of Congress to select their party's Speaker
- A court hearing that decides which candidates may stand in a primary election
- A meeting of party members in which delegates are chosen, often
- A ballot held by the federal government to choose the party's presidential nominee
-
What is the role of the national nominating conventions?
- They formally nominate a party's presidential
- They decide the outcome of the general election by a vote of the national party committee
- They elect the members of the Electoral College in each state for the coming term
- They approve all federal judges and set the policy agenda for the Supreme Court
-
Which statement about the Electoral College is most accurate?
- The Electoral College is decided by the House of Representatives in every presidential year
- The Electoral College gives each state an equal number of votes regardless of population
- A candidate who wins the national popular vote always wins the Electoral College as well
- A candidate can win the Electoral College while losing the national popular vote
-
Which debate is commonly raised about the Electoral College's effect on campaigns?
- Campaigns are equally spread across all states because the Electoral College requires it
- Campaigns are decided entirely by the national convention before any voting begins
- Campaigns are banned from holding rallies in states with fewer than 10 electoral votes
- Campaigns focus on a small number of swing states, which may limit attention to voters elsewhere
-
What is the significance of the number of electoral votes allocated to each state?
- It equals the state's number of Senate seats only, so every state has the same number of electors
- It equals the state's number of governors, who vote as electors in each presidential election
- It equals the state's population divided by 1000 and rounded to the nearest whole number
- It equals the state's number of House seats plus its two Senate seats, which reflects both population and equal state representation
-
Which factor is commonly cited as affecting electoral outcomes in the US?
- Money, media, issues, leadership and incumbency
- The number of judges appointed by the President in the previous four years
- The number of bills passed by the Senate in the previous session of Congress
- The number of executive orders signed by the President in the previous term
-
What is the significance of incumbency in US elections?
- Incumbents are barred from standing for re-election in any US election after their first term
- Incumbents often have advantages such as name recognition, fundraising and media attention
- Incumbents always lose their seats because voters prefer new candidates in every election
- Incumbents are automatically elected to a second term without any opposition in the race
-
What is the debate about campaign finance in the US?
- Whether campaigns should be banned from spending any money on advertising at all
- Whether large donations and spending by groups and individuals distort elections and political influence
- Whether candidates should be paid a salary by the Supreme Court for each campaign
- Whether each state should decide its own presidential electors without any federal rules
-
Which description matches state-level direct democracy in the US?
- Voters elect judges to the Supreme Court in every state by a national ballot
- Voters choose the President by a direct vote of their state legislature
- Voters have no direct role in state government, which is run entirely by the governor
- Voters can vote directly on laws through initiatives, referendums
-
Which factor is linked to split ticket voting?
- Voters choosing to support a candidate for President after first casting a ballot for a judge
- Voters choosing only candidates from the party they supported in every previous election
- Voters choosing candidates from different parties for different offices in the same election
- Voters choosing to abstain from voting in every election for the Senate and the House
-
Which description best matches high levels of abstention in US elections?
- Abstention is mainly a feature of the Electoral College, which discourages voters from casting ballots
- Abstention is required by law in US elections, so voters must not turn out on election day
- Almost every eligible voter casts a ballot in every US election, so abstention is rare
- A significant share of eligible voters do not turn out, which is a recognised feature of US elections
-
Which statement about realigning elections is most accurate?
- Realigning elections have no effect on party coalitions, because voters never change their party
- Realigning elections are elections in which the Supreme Court decides the outcome
- Realigning elections, such as 1932 and 1968, shifted the coalitions of voters that supported each party
- Realigning elections are held only when the Electoral College is abolished by Congress
-
Which evaluation best supports the view that voting behaviour is shaped by issues and candidates?
- Voters respond to the policies and personal qualities of candidates, which can change their support across elections
- Voters respond only to the number of years that candidates have served as judges
- Voters respond only to the instructions issued by their state governor on election day
- Voters respond only to the popular vote totals in the previous election and nothing else
-
Which evaluation best assesses the statement that voting behaviour depends on party coalitions?
- Party coalitions are created by the Supreme Court and applied to each election
- Party coalitions of demographic and ideological groups shape how voters align, though these links can change over time
- Party coalitions are fixed for ever, and voters never change their support between elections
- Party coalitions have no effect on voting, because voters choose candidates at random
-
Which factor most clearly distinguishes presidential and congressional elections in the US?
- Presidential elections are decided by the Supreme Court, whereas congressional elections are decided by the Electoral College
- Presidential elections are decided by the Electoral College, whereas congressional seats are won
- Congressional elections are decided by the Electoral College, whereas presidential elections are decided by popular vote in each state
- Both presidential and congressional elections are decided only by state legislatures using a single round of voting
-
Which argument best supports the view that the Electoral College can produce outcomes that differ from the national vote?
- The Electoral College gives equal weight to every citizen's vote, so national and state outcomes never differ
- The Electoral College always produces the same result as the national popular vote, because electors vote for the majority
- Winner-take-all allocation means a candidate can win many states narrowly and still lose the national popular vote
- The Electoral College is decided by the House of Representatives, which uses a national vote of all citizens
-
Which evaluation best supports the view that incumbency and money shape outcomes in congressional elections?
- Incumbents win only when the Supreme Court approves their candidacy in advance
- Incumbents are always defeated because voters prefer new candidates in every congressional contest
- Incumbents rarely win re-election because money has no effect on congressional campaigns
- Incumbents tend to raise more money and have higher name recognition, which can make their re-election more likely
Related quizzes
- The constitutional framework of US government Quiz · 3.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- The legislative branch: Congress Quiz · 3.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- The executive branch: sources and constraints of presidential power Quiz · 3.2.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- The executive branch: Imperial versus Imperilled Presidency Quiz · 3.2.1.3.2 · 20 questions
- The judicial branch: selection and role of the Supreme Court Quiz · 3.2.1.4.1 · 20 questions
- The judicial branch: judicial review and landmark rulings Quiz · 3.2.1.4.2 · 20 questions
- Direct democracy and voting behaviour in the USA Quiz · 3.2.1.5.2 · 20 questions
- Political parties Quiz · 3.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Pressure groups Quiz · 3.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- Civil rights Quiz · 3.2.1.8 · 20 questions