Lesson 3.2.1.4.2
3.2.1.4.2 The judicial branch: judicial review and landmark rulings Quiz: AQA Politics, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.1.4.2, The judicial branch: judicial review and landmark rulings: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Politics (7152), Unit 2: Government and politics of the USA and comparative politics, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
In the US system, what does judicial review allow the courts to do?
- The power of Congress to approve every ruling of the courts before it takes effect
- The power of courts to examine whether laws and government actions are consistent with the Constitution
- The power of the states to veto federal court decisions within their borders
- The power of the President to review the decisions of the Supreme Court each year
-
Which case established the principle of judicial review in 1803?
- Roe v Wade
- Bush v Gore
- Brown v Board of Education
- Marbury v Madison
-
Which case of the Warren Court ended legal segregation in public schools?
- Miranda v Arizona (1966)
- Roe v Wade (1973)
- Obergefell v Hodges (2015)
- Brown v Board of Education (1954)
-
What principle did Miranda v Arizona (1966) establish?
- Suspects must be released if the police have not interviewed them within 24 hours
- Suspects are entitled to a jury trial only if they confess to the crime
- Suspects can be questioned without any warning if they have previously been convicted
- Suspects must be informed of their rights before custodial interrogation
-
Which case, decided by the Burger Court in 1973, is a landmark ruling on abortion rights?
- District of Columbia v Heller
- Bush v Gore
- Roe v Wade
- United States v Nixon
-
What did United States v Nixon (1974) decide?
- The President must resign whenever a court orders him to produce evidence in a case
- The President has an absolute right to withhold any document from a court or Congress
- Executive privilege is not absolute, so the President had to hand over the Watergate tapes
- The Senate has no power to subpoena the White House for documents in any inquiry
-
Which case, decided by the Rehnquist Court in 2000, concerned the outcome of a presidential election?
- Obergefell v Hodges
- Brown v Board of Education
- Bush v Gore
- Miranda v Arizona
-
What did District of Columbia v Heller (2008) hold?
- The Second Amendment allows Congress to ban all firearms for private use in every state
- The Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms, not only a right tied to militias
- The Second Amendment applies only to members of state militias and not to individuals
- The Second Amendment has no legal effect because it was repealed by the Warren Court
-
What did Obergefell v Hodges (2015) decide?
- Same-sex marriage is a matter for Congress alone, and the Court has no role in it
- Same-sex marriage is legal only in states that approved it in a referendum before 2015
- The Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage across the United States
- Same-sex marriage is banned in all states, because the Constitution does not mention it
-
Which period of the Court is associated with Chief Justice Earl Warren?
- The Warren Court, 1954 to 1969
- The Rehnquist Court, 1986 to 2005
- The Burger Court, 1969 to 1986
- The Roberts Court, 2005 to the present
-
Which landmark ruling is most closely associated with the Warren Court?
- Brown v Board of Education (1954)
- Obergefell v Hodges (2015)
- Bush v Gore (2000)
- District of Columbia v Heller (2008)
-
Which evaluation best supports the claim that landmark rulings have changed public policy?
- Landmark rulings only affect the Supreme Court and have no effect on any other institution
- Landmark rulings only apply to federal taxation and have no effect on rights or equality
- Landmark rulings have never changed public policy, because they are always ignored by states
- Brown and Obergefell both changed how the law treated groups, affecting schools, marriage
-
Which debate is most often raised about landmark rulings such as Roe v Wade and Obergefell?
- Whether courts are interpreting the Constitution
- Whether these rulings should be decided by the Electoral College rather than the courts
- Whether these rulings should be decided by state governors in a public referendum
- Whether these rulings are binding on the Presidency but not on the Supreme Court
-
Which claim best connects landmark rulings with the strict and loose constructionism debate?
- Both constructionist views always produce the same result in every landmark case
- Landmark rulings have no connection to constructionism, because the Constitution is never interpreted
- Critics of expansive rulings often invoke strict constructionism, while supporters often argue for a broader, evolving reading
- Strict constructionism supports expansive rulings, while loose constructionism rejects all rulings
-
Which evaluation best assesses the role of landmark rulings in shaping public policy in one area?
- Court rulings shape policy only in matters of foreign affairs, and never in domestic matters
- Court rulings have never shaped any policy area because policy is always set by the legislature
- Court rulings shape policy only through executive orders issued by the Supreme Court
- Court rulings on civil rights and punishment have shaped how government policy operates in those areas
-
Which statement about the Roberts Court's landmark rulings is most accurate?
- Heller and Obergefell were decided by the Warren Court in the 1950s and 1960s
- Heller and Obergefell were decisions of the Burger Court, decided in 1973 and 1974
- Heller and Obergefell were decisions of the Electoral College that the Court later reviewed
- Heller (2008) and Obergefell v Hodges (2015)
-
Which evaluation best supports the view that judicial review can be used to expand or limit rights?
- Judicial review can only expand rights and can never restrict them under any circumstances
- Judicial review restricts only the Supreme Court and not any other court or government body
- Judicial review has no effect on rights because the Bill of Rights is never enforced by the courts
- Judicial review can protect rights from government action, but it can also restrict rights if courts uphold restrictive laws
-
Which argument best supports the view that landmark rulings are controversial?
- Many landmark rulings involve contested moral questions, so courts can face criticism whatever they decide
- Landmark rulings are controversial only because they are published in the Congressional Record
- Landmark rulings are controversial only when the President disagrees with the outcome of a case
- Landmark rulings are never controversial, because every decision is taken by unanimous vote
-
Which statement best explains why the Court's decisions matter for federalism?
- Rulings on federalism have no effect, because states always make their own rules regardless of the courts
- Rulings on federalism determine only the tax rates that the states may charge their residents
- Rulings on federalism are made by state governors, who are the final judges of the Constitution
- Rulings on the division of powers determine how far states can make their own rules within the federal system
-
Which combination best describes the function of the Supreme Court's landmark rulings?
- They repeal existing federal statutes and replace them with new Acts of Congress
- They set the annual budget of the federal government and the states
- They establish new legal principles
- They appoint the justices who will hear future cases in the same area of law
Related quizzes
- The constitutional framework of US government Quiz · 3.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- The legislative branch: Congress Quiz · 3.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- The executive branch: sources and constraints of presidential power Quiz · 3.2.1.3.1 · 20 questions
- The executive branch: Imperial versus Imperilled Presidency Quiz · 3.2.1.3.2 · 20 questions
- The judicial branch: selection and role of the Supreme Court Quiz · 3.2.1.4.1 · 20 questions
- The electoral process: candidate selection and electoral outcomes Quiz · 3.2.1.5.1 · 20 questions
- Direct democracy and voting behaviour in the USA Quiz · 3.2.1.5.2 · 20 questions
- Political parties Quiz · 3.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Pressure groups Quiz · 3.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- Civil rights Quiz · 3.2.1.8 · 20 questions