Lesson 3.2.4.5
3.2.4.5 Population ecology and its application to human populations Quiz: AQA Geography, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.4.5, Population ecology and its application to human populations: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Geography (7037), Unit 2: Human geography, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
The concept of carrying capacity refers to:
- The maximum speed at which a population can migrate
- The number of births each year in a country
- The maximum population size that an environment can sustain indefinitely given available resources
- The total weight of all people living in one city
-
Which term describes a population that is larger than the environment can sustain in the long term?
- Underpopulation
- Carrying capacity
- Overpopulation
- Optimum population
-
An optimum population is best described as:
- A population that has exactly zero growth in every year
- The population size that maximises the wellbeing of people given the resources available
- The largest population the planet can physically hold
- A population that has no interaction with its environment
-
Which concept measures the area of productive land and water needed to support a population's consumption and waste?
- Demographic dividend
- Ecological footprint
- Natural increase
- Dependency ratio
-
In the population, resources and pollution model, which feedback mechanism tends to stabilise population growth?
- Positive feedback, where rising population increases resources and so accelerates growth
- Positive feedback that always leads to permanent equilibrium
- No feedback because the population is isolated
- Negative feedback, where rising population reduces resources and so slows growth
-
Which statement best describes Malthus's central argument?
- Food production grows faster than population, so famine will never occur
- Population growth has no relationship to food supply
- Population tends to grow geometrically while food production grows arithmetically, so checks such as famine are needed
- Population and food grow at the same rate in every society
-
Which perspective argues that technological innovation and human ingenuity can expand the carrying capacity of the Earth?
- Boserup's argument that population pressure always reduces farm productivity
- Malthus's view that population growth always outstrips food supply
- Simon's view that human ingenuity and market responses overcome resource limits
- Ehrlich's warning that resource depletion will cause mass famine
-
Boserup argued that population pressure can:
- Reduce the number of people farming in the long term only
- Stimulate agricultural intensification and technical change to raise output
- Always lead to falling food output and famine
- Have no effect on agricultural systems
-
Which argument best evaluates the Malthusian view of population and resources?
- It identified real limits, but underestimated technological change and the ability of societies to adapt
- It has been entirely disproved by historical evidence, because food output has risen faster than population in every decade since
- It was entirely correct about all past and future food crises, since every famine has followed the path Malthus described
- It is irrelevant because resources are unlimited, so no population pressure could ever arise and no theory about limits is needed at all
-
A region's population doubles while its agricultural land is unchanged. Which concept best describes the change in pressure on resources?
- A change in the age structure only, with the older share of the population growing while total numbers and land use remain the same
- A fall in population density because land is unchanged, since a fixed area of farmland supports fewer people over time
- No change because density depends only on birth rate, since the number of people per hectare is set by fertility alone in every case
- A rise in population density relative to land and resources
-
Which pattern would indicate that a population has reached its carrying capacity?
- Population growth levels off as resource limits and death rates rise to match births
- Population falls to zero in the first year, as the environment cannot support a single person and the settlement is abandoned at once
- Resources increase at the same rate as the population indefinitely, so that every additional person brings enough extra food and water
- Population growth continues at the same rate indefinitely, because resources grow alongside numbers and no limit is reached
-
Which combination of factors would most likely increase the ecological footprint of a population?
- Smaller population and lower total resource demand, because fewer people means fewer homes, cars and meals across the whole region
- Less waste generation and more recycling of materials, which return resources to use and shrink the land needed to support residents
- Higher consumption per person, greater energy use and more imported goods
- Lower consumption, more local food and reduced energy use, which keep each person's demand within local supply
-
Which argument best supports the view that population size alone does not determine resource pressure?
- Consumption levels and technology strongly affect how much pressure a given population creates
- Only population size matters for resource pressure in every case, since the number of people alone decides how much they use
- Resource pressure is unrelated to consumption levels, because the same amount of land and water is needed whatever people consume
- Technology has no effect on resource use, since efficiency gains cannot change how much land, water or energy each person needs
-
Which statement about overpopulation and underpopulation is most accurate?
- Neither concept applies to any real population, because every society is at its optimum level whatever its size or density
- Both can cause problems, since too few people may struggle to sustain services and too many may exceed resources
- Underpopulation always causes more resource pressure than overpopulation, because a few people must use the same land and services
- Overpopulation is always beneficial for economic development, since more workers and consumers push up output in every economy
-
A population of 1,000 is supported by a resource base that can sustain 800 people. Which description is most accurate?
- The population exactly matches the optimum at every time, so no change in numbers would affect resource use in the region
- The population exceeds its carrying capacity and resource depletion is likely
- The population has no relation to the resource base, because numbers and supply move independently in every region of the world
- The population is below its carrying capacity and can grow, since the resource base still has room to support a larger number of people
-
Which feedback pattern could amplify a population decline in a region after a drought?
- Negative feedback that increases the food supply automatically, since fewer people always leave more food for those who remain
- No feedback at all because drought does not affect people, so food supply and population move on separate and unrelated paths
- Negative feedback that stabilises the population at its previous size, because the decline is reversed as soon as numbers fall
- Positive feedback, where falling food supply leads to migration and further loss of population
-
Which argument best evaluates the usefulness of carrying capacity as a concept for human populations?
- It is fixed for all human societies across time, so every population has the same limit whatever its technology or institutions
- It applies only to bacteria and has no link to humans, because ecological concepts are confined to microbial populations alone
- It is useful as a framework, but human carrying capacity changes with technology, trade and institutions
- It is useless because humans are not subject to any resource limits, since people can always create new land, water and food supplies
-
Which thinker is associated with the 1968 book The Population Bomb and with neo-Malthusian warnings about population growth?
- Julian Simon
- Ester Boserup
- Paul Ehrlich
- Thomas Malthus
-
A region has a carrying capacity of 50,000 people and a population of 62,000. By what percentage is the population above carrying capacity?
- 24%
- 124%
- 19%
- 12%
-
Which argument best links the population, resources and pollution model to policy choices?
- Policy should focus only on raising birth rates to match resources, since the number of people is the only lever that matters
- Pollution is irrelevant to the feedback loops within the model, because only population size and food output are linked in it
- Policy cannot influence the model because its feedbacks are fixed by nature, so no decision by government can change the outcome
- Reducing consumption and pollution can ease pressure on resources even if population size stays the same
Related quizzes
- Globalisation Quiz · 3.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Global systems Quiz · 3.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- International trade and access to markets Quiz · 3.2.1.3 · 20 questions
- Global governance Quiz · 3.2.1.4 · 20 questions
- The 'global commons' and Antarctica as a global common Quiz · 3.2.1.5 · 20 questions
- Globalisation critique Quiz · 3.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Global systems: quantitative and qualitative skills Quiz · 3.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- The nature and importance of places Quiz · 3.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Relationships, connections, meaning and representation Quiz · 3.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Changing places: quantitative and qualitative skills Quiz · 3.2.2.3 · 20 questions