Lesson 8.2.1
8.2.1 Animal and human drug studies and their ethics Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 8
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 8.2.1, Animal and human drug studies and their ethics: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 8: Health psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What does the principle of Replacement mean in the ethics of animal research on drugs?
- Replacing a laboratory with a field setting
- Using non-animal methods wherever a suitable alternative exists
- Replacing the drug with a placebo in every study
- Replacing the animal with a larger animal of the same species
-
Which two other principles, alongside Replacement, make up the 3Rs of animal research?
- Reliability and Validity
- Retrieval and Recall
- Reduction and Refinement
- Randomisation and Replication
-
Which UK legislation regulates the use of animals in scientific procedures, including drug research?
- The Children Act 1989
- The Mental Health Act 1983
- The Scientific Procedures Act 1986
- The Data Protection Act 2018
-
In animal studies of drug reward, what does the self-administration procedure allow researchers to measure?
- How much the animal weighs at the end of the study
- How much of the drug an animal chooses to take when it can control its own access
- How quickly the animal learns to walk
- The animal's colour preference in a maze only
-
A researcher gives rats a drug and places them in a distinctive chamber, then measures how much time they spend in that chamber later. Which technique is this?
- Strange Situation
- Twin concordance analysis
- Conditioned place preference
- Visual cliff testing
-
Which ethical issue is most significant in animal drug studies that involve long-term dependence?
- The need for animals to be debriefed about the purpose of the study
- The potential for pain, distress and harm to the animals, which must be minimised and justified
- The use of animals as participants in a questionnaire
- The need for animals to sign a written consent form
-
Why might findings from animal studies of heroin self-administration be limited when applied to human addiction?
- Animals always become tolerant faster than humans
- Animal brains are identical to human brains in every way
- Animal studies never use drugs
- Animals cannot report cravings in the same way humans do, and social and cultural factors are absent
-
Which human research method allows a researcher to test whether a drug causes a change in behaviour?
- A randomised controlled experiment
- A cross-sectional survey with no comparison group
- A content analysis of newspapers
- A case study of a single participant only
-
A study uses a double-blind design to test a new drug for alcohol dependence. What does double-blind mean here?
- Neither the participants nor the researchers who assess outcomes know who received the drug or placebo
- The drug is given twice a day to all participants
- The study is carried out in two different countries
- Both the participants and the animals receive two doses
-
Which ethical principle requires that a person who takes part in a human drug study must understand what the study involves and agree to take part?
- Retrospective anonymity
- Informed consent
- Debriefing only
- Protection of animals
-
Why is it ethically important to assess risk before a study involving a drug given to humans?
- To ensure that the potential harm to participants is minimised and justified by the value of the research
- To guarantee that the study will produce significant results
- To remove the need for informed consent
- To make the study cheaper for the researcher
-
A researcher wants to compare the effects of two drugs on human reaction time. Which experimental design avoids participants being affected by previous exposure to a drug?
- Case study design with one participant
- Independent groups design with different participants in each condition
- Matched pairs design with no control
- Repeated measures design with the same participants in both conditions and no counterbalancing
-
Which evaluation point about human drug experiments is most valid?
- Human experiments can never be carried out for ethical reasons
- Laboratory experiments always have perfect ecological validity
- Human experiments have no internal validity
- Laboratory drug experiments can have high internal validity but low ecological validity, as people may behave differently in real life
-
A researcher asks participants to rate their drug cravings on a scale from 0 to 10 at intervals during an experiment. What type of data is produced?
- Primary qualitative data only
- Covert observational data
- Quantitative data
- Secondary data from medical records
-
Why might a researcher choose a case study design when studying the effects of a drug on one individual?
- It guarantees a control group
- It allows the findings to be generalised to every person who takes the drug
- It removes the need for ethical approval
- It provides an in-depth account of an unusual or rare case, although the findings cannot be generalised widely
-
Which ethical concern is most relevant when a human drug study uses participants who are dependent on the drug?
- Their location, which must be kept secret from the researcher
- Their gender, which is always a reason to exclude them
- Vulnerability, so consent must be fully informed and participants must be able to withdraw without losing their treatment
- Their age, which is always a reason to exclude them
-
A study uses animal and human participants to study the same drug. Which combined limitation is most important to consider?
- Human studies cannot produce any quantitative data
- Both species always respond identically
- Animal studies cannot measure any drug effect
- Different species may respond differently, so results may not transfer directly between animals and humans
-
Which statement about the ethics of animal research is most accurate?
- Animal research is always unethical and should never be carried out
- Animal research requires no ethical review because animals cannot be harmed
- Researchers should use as many animals as possible to increase the sample
- Researchers must weigh potential scientific benefit against harm to animals and use the fewest animals needed
-
A researcher finds that a drug reduces drug-seeking in rats but that the same effect was not found in human trials. Which explanation best accounts for this difference?
- The rats were not properly trained
- The human participants were lying about their use
- Species differences and the limits of animal models in capturing human motivation and social context
- The drug had no effect in either species
-
Why is it important that animal drug studies record welfare indicators throughout the procedure?
- So that researchers can avoid submitting a licence application
- So that the animals can be used again in another study without restriction
- So that suffering can be detected early and procedures stopped or refined if harm exceeds what was justified
- So that the data can be converted into quantitative measures of consent
Related quizzes
- Addiction, tolerance, dependency and withdrawal Quiz · 8.1.1 · 20 questions
- Theories of obedience: agency theory and social impact theory Quiz · 1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Working memory model Quiz · 2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Neurons, neurotransmitters and recreational drugs Quiz · 3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Classical conditioning and Pavlov's experiment Quiz · 4.1.1 · 20 questions
- Diagnosing mental disorders and classification systems Quiz · 5.1.1 · 20 questions
- Biological and social explanations of crime Quiz · 6.1.1 · 20 questions
- Bowlby's work on attachment Quiz · 7.1.1 · 20 questions
- Milgram's obedience research and variation studies Quiz · 1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Multi-store model of memory Quiz · 2.1.2 · 20 questions