Lesson 4.2.3
4.2.3 Analysing data and the scientific status of psychology Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 4
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.2.3, Analysing data and the scientific status of psychology: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 4: Learning theories, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which level of measurement is used for categorical data with no inherent order, such as type of drink chosen?
- Interval data, which have equal intervals between values but no true zero point on the scale used
- Ordinal data, which are ranked categories with an order but with no equal intervals between the ranks
- Nominal data, which are categories with no meaningful order or equal intervals between them
- Ratio data, which have equal intervals and a true zero point, so that ratios between values are meaningful
-
Which level of measurement is a finishing position in a race, where the gaps between positions are not equal?
- Nominal data, because each finishing position is simply a named category with no order between the positions
- Interval data, because the positions are measured on a scale with equal gaps between each finishing place
- Ordinal data, because the positions are ranked in order but the time gaps between them are not equal
- Ratio data, because the positions have a true zero point, so a first place is exactly zero times as good as a second
-
Why would a researcher choose a chi-squared test for a study?
- Because the data are frequencies of categorical responses, and the test compares observed frequencies with expected ones
- Because the data are continuous and normally distributed, and the test compares the means of two groups on an interval scale
- Because the data are brain scan images, and the test estimates the difference between the intensities of the scanned regions
- Because the data are ranks of pairs, and the test calculates the correlation between two ordinal variables for each participant
-
A chi-squared test gives a calculated value of 10 with one degree of freedom. The critical value at the 0.05 level is 3.84. What is the conclusion?
- The result is significant only at the 0.001 level, because any value above 3.84 always reaches the strictest level of significance
- The result is significant at the 0.05 level, because the calculated value of 10 exceeds the critical value of 3.84
- The result is not significant, because the calculated value of 10 is smaller than the critical value of 3.84 at 0.05
- The result cannot be interpreted, because chi-squared tests can only be used when the degrees of freedom are at least 20
-
Observed counts are 30 in one category and 10 in another, with expected counts of 20 and 20. What is the chi-squared value?
- 10, calculated as (30 minus 20) squared divided by 20, plus (10 minus 20) squared divided by 20
- 2, calculated as the square root of the sum of the observed counts divided by the expected counts
- 5, calculated as the sum of the observed counts divided by the number of categories used in the table
- 20, calculated as the difference between the two observed counts, which gives the size of the effect
-
Which assumption is important when using a chi-squared test?
- The data should be paired, with each participant measured twice in exactly the same condition in every session
- Each observation should be independent, so that one participant contributes to only one category in the table
- The data should be interval level, with equal intervals and a true zero point on the scale used for the measure
- Each participant should be counted in every category, so that the same person appears in several cells of the table
-
Thematic analysis is a method used to:
- measure the amount of neural activity in specific brain regions, using a scan of each participant during the task
- calculate the mean and standard deviation of quantitative scores, which are then compared with a normal distribution
- estimate the strength of a correlation between two ordinal variables, using ranks assigned to each participant's answers
- identify and report recurring themes in qualitative data, such as interview transcripts or observation notes
-
Which of these is an example of reliability in psychological research?
- A test that measures what it claims to measure, such as aggression, rather than another related construct entirely
- A test that uses a large sample size, which is the only factor that determines whether results are reliable in any study
- A test that gives similar results when the same participants are tested again under the same conditions over time
- A test that produces results that generalise to every culture, age group and setting in the world without any change
-
Which type of validity refers to whether a study's findings can be applied to real-life settings?
- Concurrent validity, which concerns whether a test agrees with another measure taken at the same time in the study
- Construct validity, which concerns whether the internal structure of a theory matches the observed behaviour in the lab
- Ecological validity, which concerns whether findings generalise to everyday settings and natural behaviour
- Internal validity, which concerns whether the manipulation of the variable is the only cause of the change in the outcome
-
Which type of validity refers to whether a test predicts later behaviour?
- Ecological validity, which concerns whether the test scores can be applied to the natural world in everyday life
- Predictive validity, which concerns whether a measure's scores predict a later outcome or behaviour of interest
- Face validity, which concerns whether the test looks like it is measuring the right thing to a casual observer
- Internal validity, which concerns whether the researcher controls all extraneous variables inside the laboratory
-
What does falsification mean in the context of scientific theories, as described by Popper?
- A theory is scientific if it can, in principle, be proven wrong by evidence, so testable predictions are needed
- A theory is scientific if it is accepted by most people in society, since public agreement is the test of truth
- A theory is scientific if it explains every possible event, so that no observation could ever count against it
- A theory is scientific if it relies only on personal experience, since subjective evidence is the basis of all knowledge
-
Why is the psychodynamic theory of aggression sometimes criticised for lacking scientific status?
- Its concepts are based entirely on brain scans, which cannot be used to make any predictions about human behaviour
- Its concepts can all be measured precisely with hormone assays, which means the theory is more scientific than biology
- Its concepts rely on large randomised experiments, which are impossible to replicate in any laboratory setting at all
- Its concepts, such as the id and superego, are hard to test and can be used to explain almost any behaviour afterwards
-
Which statement describes the role of a control in a psychological experiment?
- A control is the statistical test used to check whether the results are significant at the 0.05 level in the analysis
- A control is the group of participants who receive the most intensive treatment in the study for the longest time period
- A control is the measure of the dependent variable that the researcher chooses to record for each participant in the study
- A control removes extraneous variables that could affect the results, so that the effect of the variable is clearer
-
A researcher designs an experiment in which all participants are tested in the same room at the same time of day. What is the purpose of this?
- To ensure that the independent variable is not manipulated, so that the study is purely correlational in its design
- To make the study unethical, since the same room may cause participants to feel bored and so reduce their performance
- To increase the reliability of the scoring system, since the same room always leads to identical scores for all participants
- To control extraneous variables, so that differences in the environment are less likely to affect the dependent variable
-
Which of these is an example of empiricism?
- Relying on the authority of a famous theorist without collecting any data to test the claims made in their writings
- Explaining behaviour through unconscious drives that cannot be observed or measured by any scientific instrument at all
- Accepting a theory because it is consistent with the personal beliefs of the researcher and the wider society in which they live
- Collecting data through observation and measurement to test a hypothesis, rather than relying on intuition alone
-
A researcher tests a hypothesis that a drug reduces aggression, and finds a significant effect at the 0.05 level. Which statement is most accurate?
- The result shows the drug has no effect on aggression, since significance at 0.05 always means the drug has no effect at all
- The result shows the probability of the observed effect, if the null hypothesis were true, is less than 5%, so the null is rejected
- The result proves the drug causes aggression to fall in all people, since any significant result is always a proof of cause
- The result shows that the sample was biased, since significant results are always caused by unrepresentative samples in research
-
Why is replicability important in scientific psychology?
- It allows other researchers to repeat a study and check whether the same findings are obtained, which supports reliability of findings
- It allows the study to be carried out without ethical approval, since a replicated study is always exempt from ethics review
- It allows the sample to be made smaller, since a replicated study can use fewer participants without any loss of power at all
- It allows researchers to change the findings of earlier studies so that they agree with the researcher's own personal beliefs
-
Which is a criticism of reductionism in the scientific status of psychology?
- Reductionism explains complex behaviour using only one level of analysis, which may miss important social and cultural influences
- Reductionism uses only qualitative data, so it cannot be tested with statistics, which means it is not a science in any sense
- Reductionism explains complex behaviour using many levels of analysis, which makes the explanation too long to be useful at all
- Reductionism cannot be applied to any scientific study, since science only ever deals with social and cultural behaviour in practice
-
A researcher's measure correlates well with a later outcome that it was designed to predict. Which type of validity is shown?
- Reliability, because the measure gives identical scores every time it is used with the same participant in the study
- Internal validity, because the researcher's measure has been controlled for all extraneous variables inside the laboratory
- Face validity, because the measure looks appropriate to participants who complete it in the study session at the start
- Predictive validity, because the measure's scores accurately predict the later outcome they were designed to predict
-
Which statement about levels of measurement and statistical tests is most accurate?
- The level of measurement applies only to brain scans, so it is irrelevant to the analysis of questionnaire data in psychology
- The level of measurement is decided only after the analysis is complete, so it cannot influence the choice of test at all
- The level of measurement has no effect on which tests are appropriate, since any test can be used with any data type at all
- The level of measurement helps determine which tests are appropriate, so the choice of test should match the data type
Related quizzes
- Classical conditioning and Pavlov's experiment Quiz · 4.1.1 · 20 questions
- Operant conditioning, reinforcement and behaviour modification Quiz · 4.1.2 · 20 questions
- Social learning theory: observation, imitation and the four stages Quiz · 4.1.3 · 20 questions
- Bandura's Bobo doll experiments Quiz · 4.1.4 · 20 questions
- Learning theories of phobias and their treatment Quiz · 4.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in learning Quiz · 4.1.6 · 20 questions
- Observational research and content analysis Quiz · 4.2.1 · 20 questions
- Animal research and ethics Quiz · 4.2.2 · 20 questions
- Watson and Rayner, Becker, Bastian and Capafons studies Quiz · 4.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: learning theory in society Quiz · 4.4.1 · 20 questions