Lesson 4.3.1
4.3.1 Watson and Rayner, Becker, Bastian and Capafons studies Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 4
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.3.1, Watson and Rayner, Becker, Bastian and Capafons studies: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 4: Learning theories, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
In Watson and Rayner's (1920) study, what was the conditioned stimulus?
- A white rat, which was initially neutral and came to produce fear in the infant after being paired with the loud noise
- A loud noise made by striking a steel bar with a hammer, which had caused fear in the infant from the start of the study
- The infant's mother, whose presence was used as the reinforcer to calm the child during the sessions of the study
- A fur coat, which was the unconditioned response to the noise and produced fear in the child at every session
-
What was the unconditioned stimulus in Watson and Rayner's Little Albert study?
- The white rat, which produced fear in Albert from the first trial onward without any pairing with the loud noise
- The loud noise, which naturally produced a fear response in Albert without any prior learning
- The researcher's voice, which was used to comfort Albert and so provided the unconditioned stimulus for relaxation
- The laboratory room, whose environment made Albert anxious and so provided the unconditioned stimulus for the study
-
Watson and Rayner found that Albert's fear generalised to other objects. Which of these was an example of generalisation?
- Albert's fear spread to the researcher's office, which was a neutral environment with no animal in it at any time
- Albert's fear spread to a rabbit and a fur coat, which were similar in appearance to the original white rat
- Albert's fear was removed by the researchers, who gave him a sweet every time he looked at the white rat
- Albert's fear disappeared completely after the first session, showing that the response was not learned at all
-
Why is Watson and Rayner's Little Albert study considered unethical by modern standards?
- Because the study used a laboratory, which has been banned for any research that involves young children in the UK
- Because the study used a questionnaire, which has been shown to damage the mental health of infants in every case
- Because the study used a white rat, which is an animal that is not allowed to be used in any psychology research at all
- Because Albert was an infant who was deliberately conditioned to fear, and the fear was not removed before he left the study
-
What was the main aim of Watson and Rayner's study?
- To show that the id causes fear in infants, which Freud had suggested in his early work on childhood development
- To show that fears such as phobias could be acquired through classical conditioning, supporting a learning explanation
- To show that infants cannot learn anything before the age of five, so learning theories cannot apply to babies at all
- To show that fears are inherited from parents through genes, so no learning is needed for any fear to develop in a child
-
Becker et al. (2002) studied eating behaviours after television was introduced to Fiji. What did they find?
- Eating disorder symptoms were found only in boys, while the girls showed no change in their eating attitudes at any point
- Eating disorder symptoms disappeared completely, because the television programmes taught the girls healthy eating habits
- Eating disorder symptoms, such as self-induced vomiting and dieting attitudes, increased among the adolescent girls studied
- Eating disorder symptoms were unaffected, showing that television has no influence on the attitudes of young people at all
-
Which social learning concept is most relevant to explaining Becker et al.'s findings?
- Primary reinforcement from the food itself, which is the only factor that could explain increases in eating
- Extinction of a conditioned response to food after the girls were repeatedly exposed to images of food
- Spontaneous recovery of a fear response after the television was switched off for a period of rest
- Modelling of thin ideals and eating behaviours observed on television, which adolescents may imitate
-
Bastian et al. (2011) studied violent video games. What did they find about players' attributions of humanity to a victim?
- Players who had recently played a violent video game attributed more uniquely human emotion to the victim than controls
- Players who had recently played a violent video game attributed less uniquely human emotion to the victim than controls
- Players attributed the same level of humanity to the victim whether or not they had played any video game beforehand
- Players could not recall the victim at all, showing that video games remove any memory of the people in the game
-
What is the term used for the effect Bastian et al. described, where people are seen as less than fully human?
- Observational learning of the id, in which players unconsciously copy the aggressive drives of the characters in games
- Stimulus generalisation, in which a response to one game character spreads to all people that players encounter later
- Systematic desensitisation, in which a graded hierarchy of frightening scenes gradually reduces the fear of human victims
- Cyber-dehumanisation, in which violent game play reduces the attribution of uniquely human qualities to other people
-
Capafóns et al. (1998) studied systematic desensitisation for fear of flying. What was the key finding?
- Systematic desensitisation increased fear of flying, because the relaxation procedure caused the participants to panic more
- Systematic desensitisation reduced fear of flying more than no treatment, which supported its use for specific phobias
- Systematic desensitisation worked only for participants who had never flown before, showing that it cannot treat fear of flying
- Systematic desensitisation had no effect on fear of flying, so the treatment was abandoned by the researchers after the study
-
Which feature of Capafóns et al.'s study suggests the findings are of practical use?
- The treatment was applied only to animals, so the findings could not be used in any human clinical setting at all
- The treatment was applied to a fear of spiders kept in a glass box, so it had no relevance to any real-world phobia
- The treatment was applied only in a dream, so its effects on real behaviour could not be measured by the researchers
- The treatment was applied to a real fear, flying, and its effect was measured in terms of reduced fear and avoidance
-
Which of these is a common strength of the four studies in 4.3 (Watson and Rayner, Becker, Bastian, Capafóns)?
- They each avoid any link to learning theory, so they provide evidence for biological explanations of behaviour only
- They each link learning theory to a real behaviour or emotion, using a defined and measurable outcome
- They each rely only on the personal interview of a single participant, so they offer rich but unverifiable case evidence
- They each use unknown outcomes that cannot be measured, so their findings are impossible to test with any statistics
-
A critic argues that Watson and Rayner's findings from one infant cannot be generalised. Which is the most valid response?
- A single case study always shows how all infants behave, so the findings can be applied to every child in the world
- A single case study has limited generalisability, so the findings should be treated with caution until replicated
- A single case study is valid only if it was carried out with an adult, so the infant data must always be disregarded
- A single case study is invalid because it included a rat, which means that no conclusion from it can ever be drawn
-
Which of these best describes the ethical lesson from Watson and Rayner's study for modern research?
- Researchers must protect participants from harm, including ensuring that any distress caused is reversed before the study ends
- Researchers may cause any distress they like, provided the study is published in a major journal with a high impact factor
- Researchers need never consider ethics with infants, since infants are not capable of experiencing fear or any other emotion
- Researchers need only obtain consent from the infant, which is always sufficient for the protection of any child in research
-
Becker et al.'s study used a natural experiment. Which feature of a natural experiment is most relevant to this study?
- The researchers randomly assigned girls to different television conditions in a laboratory with full control of every factor
- The researchers manipulated the food available to each girl, which was the only variable changed during the entire study
- The change in exposure to television happened naturally in the community, rather than being manipulated by the researchers
- The researchers had no contact with the community, so the television change was measured only by reading old records
-
Which of these is a valid criticism of Bastian et al.'s research on violent video games?
- It is based on brain scans of the entire population of gamers, so it cannot be generalised to individuals at all
- It is correlational or laboratory-based, so it may not reflect the long-term effects of gaming in everyday life
- It is based on a sample of infants, so it cannot be applied to any adult who has ever played a video game before
- It is based on the id, which cannot be measured, so the study has no evidence to support any of its conclusions
-
Which concept links the four studies in 4.3 to the wider theme of learning theories?
- The unconscious id, which drives all behaviour and cannot be affected by any experience or environmental factor at all
- Individual differences in genes, which are fixed at birth and cannot be changed by any learning experience in life
- Hormonal changes at puberty, which are the only factor that explains changes in eating, fear and aggression in people
- Learning from environmental experiences, such as conditioning, modelling and exposure, shapes emotions and behaviour
-
A researcher uses Becker et al.'s findings to argue that media causes eating disorders in all adolescents. What is the best evaluation of this claim?
- The claim is fully supported, since the Becker study showed that every adolescent exposed to any media develops an eating disorder
- The claim is incorrect, since adolescents are never influenced by the people they observe, whatever the media context
- The claim goes beyond the evidence, since media exposure is one factor among many, and effects vary between individuals
- The claim is irrelevant, since media cannot influence any attitude or behaviour in young people in any setting at all
-
How was Little Albert's fear measured in Watson and Rayner's study?
- By asking Albert to rate his fear on a scale from one to ten after each trial, using a simple picture chart
- By giving Albert an IQ test before and after each conditioning trial, and comparing his scores across sessions
- By observing and recording his reactions, such as crying, withdrawal and avoidance, when the stimuli were presented
- By measuring the number of hours Albert slept between sessions, which was taken as a direct index of his level of fear
-
In Watson and Rayner's study, what was the conditioned response?
- The loud noise itself, which caused a natural startle response from Albert at the start of the procedure
- The laboratory setting, which became associated with the rat after the first session of the study had ended
- Crying at the researcher's face, which was a response to the facial expression of the researcher in every session
- Fear of the white rat, produced after the rat had been paired with the loud noise over several trials
Related quizzes
- Classical conditioning and Pavlov's experiment Quiz · 4.1.1 · 20 questions
- Operant conditioning, reinforcement and behaviour modification Quiz · 4.1.2 · 20 questions
- Social learning theory: observation, imitation and the four stages Quiz · 4.1.3 · 20 questions
- Bandura's Bobo doll experiments Quiz · 4.1.4 · 20 questions
- Learning theories of phobias and their treatment Quiz · 4.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in learning Quiz · 4.1.6 · 20 questions
- Observational research and content analysis Quiz · 4.2.1 · 20 questions
- Animal research and ethics Quiz · 4.2.2 · 20 questions
- Analysing data and the scientific status of psychology Quiz · 4.2.3 · 20 questions
- Key question: learning theory in society Quiz · 4.4.1 · 20 questions