Lesson 4.1.4
4.1.4 Bandura's Bobo doll experiments Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 4
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.1.4, Bandura's Bobo doll experiments: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 4: Learning theories, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
In Bandura's original Bobo doll study (1961), what was the aim?
- To test whether children can learn to read more quickly when they are taught using a Bobo doll as a teaching aid in class
- To test whether adults show less aggression after playing with a soft toy, as predicted by Freud's catharsis hypothesis
- To test whether children imitate aggressive behaviour that they observe in an adult model, compared with a non-aggressive model
- To test whether the id of a child is stronger than the superego when a toy is removed from the child during play time
-
In Bandura's 1961 study, which group of children was the main focus of the findings?
- Adults in their thirties, who were asked to play with a Bobo doll in a laboratory after completing a questionnaire on mood
- Children aged around 3 to 6, who were exposed to adult models who were either aggressive or non-aggressive toward the doll
- Teenagers in a secondary school, who were asked to rate the aggression of films they had seen on television at home
- Newborn infants, who were observed in their cots while adults hit an inflatable doll placed close to them in the nursery
-
What did Bandura (1961) find about children who observed an aggressive adult model?
- They only imitated the aggression after a delay of several months, which showed that imitation requires long-term memory alone
- They showed no imitation at all, which confirmed that aggression is entirely innate and cannot be learned from any model
- They imitated the aggressive behaviour, including specific physical and verbal aggressive acts towards the doll, more than controls
- They were less likely to imitate aggression than children who saw a non-aggressive model, because aggression was suppressed
-
Why did Bandura use both live models and film versions of the model in his later research?
- To check whether children could identify the difference between cartoon animals and real humans in the play sessions with dolls
- To ensure that children were never exposed to any model, so that the baseline level of aggression could be measured accurately
- To test whether a film could make children sleep during the play session, which would reduce their level of aggression
- To compare whether children imitate aggression in the same way from a live person and from a filmed model shown on screen
-
In Bandura's 1965 Bobo doll study, what was manipulated about the model?
- Whether the doll was red or blue, which was the only factor that was changed in order to test the effect of colour
- Whether the model was rewarded, punished or had no consequence for the aggressive behaviour that the children observed
- Whether the children were allowed to eat sweets during the session, which controlled the level of motivation in each group
- Whether the model was male or female, which was the only factor that was changed across all the conditions in the study
-
What did Bandura (1965) find when children saw the model punished for aggression?
- They became aggressive towards the adult who punished the model, which showed that punishment always causes retaliation directly
- They imitated less aggression than children who saw the model rewarded, showing that observed punishment reduced imitation
- They imitated the aggressive behaviour more than children who saw the model rewarded, because punishment encourages imitation
- They showed identical imitation to all other groups, which proved that vicarious consequences have no effect on any learning
-
In the 1965 study, what happened when children were offered a reward for reproducing the model's behaviour?
- Children in the rewarded group became less aggressive, because the reward reduced their motivation to copy the model further
- Children in the control group stopped being aggressive, because the reward caused their behaviour to change to a calmer style
- Children in all groups showed similar levels of learned behaviour, showing that the behaviour had been learned in each group
- Children in the punished group showed no learning at all, which proved that they had no memory of the model's behaviour
-
What does the 1965 finding suggest about the difference between learning and performance?
- Learning and performance are identical, so a child who has learned a behaviour must always show it in every situation
- Learning occurs only after a reward is received, so children never learn anything from a model that is not rewarded at all
- Performance occurs only when the child is punished, since learning cannot happen without a negative consequence at all
- A behaviour can be learned without being performed, and incentives such as rewards can affect whether it is shown
-
Which ethical concern is most relevant to Bandura's Bobo doll studies?
- Children were given too many sweets as rewards, which may have caused dental problems in the long term for the participants
- Children were asked to remain silent for long periods of the study, which may have caused anxiety for each of the children
- Children were exposed to aggressive models, which may have encouraged aggressive behaviour in the children themselves
- Children were asked to play with dolls at home, which is a breach of the rule that research must be carried out in schools
-
Which limitation of the Bobo doll studies is most often raised?
- The results cannot be measured, since aggression toward a doll is impossible to observe or count in any kind of study at all
- The results are too consistent, since all children in every study behaved in exactly the same way toward the doll always
- The results may lack ecological validity, since children in a laboratory playing with a doll may not behave as they do in real life
- The results were collected only from adult volunteers, so they cannot be generalised to any child in any part of the world
-
A child who hits a doll after watching an adult do the same is showing which process?
- Operant conditioning through the removal of an unpleasant stimulus after the child hits the doll for the first time
- Imitation of modelled behaviour, following observation of an aggressive adult model in the play setting
- Classical conditioning of a neutral stimulus, in which the doll becomes a conditioned stimulus for pain
- Catharsis, in which the child releases built-up aggressive energy by hitting the doll in the play session
-
Which feature of Bandura's Bobo doll studies makes them a strength in evaluation?
- They used a large sample of adults in a field setting, which gives the findings high population generalisability
- They used interviews with the children about their feelings, which provided rich qualitative data about aggression
- They used a controlled experimental design with clear measures of aggression, which gives high internal validity
- They used a naturalistic design in which children's aggression was recorded at home without any control of the setting
-
In the Bobo doll experiments, why did Bandura use a control group that did not see any aggressive model?
- To provide a baseline of how much aggression children showed without the model, to compare against the aggressive model groups
- To provide a group that would be punished for aggression, so that the researchers could measure the effect of punishment directly
- To provide a group of children who would never see any doll, so that the doll could be removed from the study completely
- To provide a group that would be rewarded for each act of aggression, so that the rewards could be compared across groups
-
Which statement best describes what the Bobo doll studies suggest about the role of observation in aggression?
- Aggression is always innate and cannot be changed by any experience, so observation has no influence on any child's behaviour
- Aggression can be learned through observing a model, and the consequences that the model receives can influence whether it is imitated
- Aggression is caused by hormones alone, so the presence of a model in the room does not affect the aggression of the child
- Aggression is learned only through direct physical punishment, so observing a model cannot influence the behaviour of a child
-
Which factor did Bandura find affected imitation of aggression in his early research?
- The time of day of the session, with children always being more aggressive in the morning than in the afternoon sessions
- The colour of the doll, with red dolls always receiving more aggression than blue dolls in all of the research sessions
- The number of siblings the child had, with only-children being the only ones who imitated aggressive models in any study
- The gender of the model, with boys more likely to imitate aggression shown by a male model than by a female model
-
A psychologist claims that the Bobo doll findings show that television violence always causes aggression in children. What is the best evaluation of this claim?
- The claim goes beyond the evidence, since the studies show imitation in a lab but not that all children always become aggressive
- The claim is incorrect, since children who watch television never imitate any behaviour that they observe on the screen at all
- The claim is fully supported, since the Bobo doll studies show that every child who watches television becomes aggressive for life
- The claim is irrelevant, since the Bobo doll studies did not use any television, and so cannot say anything about media violence
-
Which concept does Bandura's 1965 study test most directly?
- Catharsis, since it examines whether the release of aggressive energy by the child reduces their later aggression
- Stimulus generalisation, since it examines whether children respond to dolls that look similar to the original doll used
- Spontaneous recovery, since it examines whether children return to aggression after a long rest period from the study
- Vicarious reinforcement, since it examines how observing a model rewarded or punished affects a child's imitation
-
Which statement about the Bobo doll findings and the Freudian explanation of aggression is most accurate?
- The Bobo doll findings fully support Freud's catharsis, since children who hit the doll release their aggressive energy and calm down
- The Bobo doll findings show that the id is absent in children, which means Freud's theory cannot apply to child aggression at all
- The Bobo doll findings support social learning explanations, and they do not support the view that catharsis reduces aggression
- The Bobo doll findings show that superego development prevents all aggression, so no children are ever aggressive towards dolls
-
A researcher replicates the Bobo doll study but uses a live model in a school. What is the main benefit of this replication?
- It shows that children never imitate aggression at school, since school environments are free from any aggressive models
- It guarantees that the findings will be identical to the original, which means that no further replications need to be done
- It tests the findings in a more natural setting, which can increase ecological validity of the original laboratory results
- It removes all ethical issues, since children in schools are never exposed to any model during any kind of research session
-
Why did Bandura use an inflatable Bobo doll as the target of aggression rather than a real person?
- It allowed children to show aggression toward a target without any risk of real physical harm to a person in the study
- It was cheaper than a real person, and cost was the only reason the study could be funded by the research body at the time
- It was used so that children could not see the model's facial expressions, which were the only cause of imitation found
- It was used because children cannot show aggression toward any real person in any situation, however it is provoked
Related quizzes
- Classical conditioning and Pavlov's experiment Quiz · 4.1.1 · 20 questions
- Operant conditioning, reinforcement and behaviour modification Quiz · 4.1.2 · 20 questions
- Social learning theory: observation, imitation and the four stages Quiz · 4.1.3 · 20 questions
- Learning theories of phobias and their treatment Quiz · 4.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in learning Quiz · 4.1.6 · 20 questions
- Observational research and content analysis Quiz · 4.2.1 · 20 questions
- Animal research and ethics Quiz · 4.2.2 · 20 questions
- Analysing data and the scientific status of psychology Quiz · 4.2.3 · 20 questions
- Watson and Rayner, Becker, Bastian and Capafons studies Quiz · 4.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: learning theory in society Quiz · 4.4.1 · 20 questions