Lesson 3.2.2
3.2.2 Brain scanning, twin and adoption studies Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.2, Brain scanning, twin and adoption studies: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 3: Biological psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which brain-scanning technique produces structural images of the brain by taking X-ray measurements from many angles?
- fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging), which detects changes in blood oxygenation linked to neural activity in the brain
- EEG (electroencephalography), which records electrical activity from electrodes placed on the scalp of the participant
- CAT (computerised axial tomography), which builds detailed structural images from X-ray slices taken around the head
- PET (positron emission tomography), which tracks a radioactive glucose tracer to show the brain's activity levels over time
-
What does PET scanning measure in the brain?
- The structure of the skull and the thickness of the bone, which is used to identify areas of injury after an accident
- The activity of the brain, by tracking a radioactive tracer that accumulates where there is higher metabolic activity
- The magnetic field produced by the heart, which shows the timing of each heartbeat across the participant's chest
- The electrical spikes of individual neurons, recorded directly from the surface of the brain in a surgical procedure
-
fMRI scanning is often preferred to PET for studying brain function because:
- it uses no radioactive tracer and gives better spatial detail of changes in brain activity
- it measures individual neurons directly, which PET cannot do because the tracer is too large to reach the cell bodies
- it uses ionising radiation, which penetrates the brain more deeply and produces more detailed images of brain tissue
- it is cheaper and quicker than any other method, and it requires no equipment or trained operators to run the scan
-
In a twin study, what does a concordance rate of 100% for a behaviour in monozygotic twins suggest?
- That the behaviour is entirely caused by the environment, since twins share identical experiences in their home settings
- That the behaviour is caused by chance alone, because twins are always identical in every aspect of their development
- That the behaviour is unrelated to genes, because identical twins can never share the same trait in any circumstances
- That the behaviour has a strong genetic component, since monozygotic twins share all of their genes in common
-
Why are dizygotic twins compared with monozygotic twins in twin studies?
- To estimate genetic contribution, since dizygotic twins share about half their genes, as siblings do
- To confirm that the trait is learned, since dizygotic twins are always raised apart and so cannot share any environment
- To find out whether the trait is shared more by twins who share the same environment, which removes any effect of genes
- To check whether the researcher has made an error in coding, because dizygotic twins always have identical scores on tests
-
In an adoption study, researchers compare adopted children with their biological and adoptive families. What is the key purpose of this design?
- To ensure the children receive identical treatment in both families, which removes any influence of genes from the study entirely
- To separate the effects of genes, shared through biological parents, from the effects of the environment, shared through adoptive parents
- To prove that the adoptive environment is always the most important influence on a child's personality development over time
- To show that adoption always causes children to become more aggressive, since they are removed from their natural parents at birth
-
A study finds that adopted children resemble their biological parents in aggression more than their adoptive parents. What does this suggest?
- That genetic factors may contribute to aggression, since resemblance to biological relatives is stronger than to adoptive ones
- That aggression is caused entirely by hormones, since the adopted children's hormone levels resemble those of their biological parents
- That the environment provided by adoptive parents is the main cause of aggression in every adopted child in the study
- That aggression cannot be measured in adopted children, because adoption disrupts any consistent behaviour across development
-
Which limitation applies to twin studies that assume equal environments for MZ and DZ twins?
- The assumption may be false, since MZ twins are often treated more similarly by others, which can inflate estimates of genetic influence
- The assumption is always true, so twin studies cannot produce any evidence that might contradict a genetic explanation at all
- The assumption makes twin studies irrelevant, since the environment has no effect on any behaviour in childhood or adulthood
- The assumption affects only adoption studies, so twin studies are not limited by it in any form at any point in the research
-
A researcher uses fMRI to compare brain activity during an aggressive task with a neutral task. Which measure does fMRI use to show this change?
- The change in blood oxygenation, which reflects increased neural activity in regions working harder
- The electrical potential recorded at a single electrode, which shows only the activity of the outer layer of the cortex
- The concentration of a radioactive tracer that accumulates at the sites of neural activity in the brain during the task
- The number of X-ray beams that pass through each slice of the brain, which reveals changes in the density of tissue
-
Which ethical issue is most relevant to using PET scans in research on aggression?
- The use of a magnetic field, which may affect the cardiac pacemakers of some participants, so it must always be avoided entirely
- The use of a questionnaire, which may produce social desirability bias and so must be piloted before any scan takes place
- The use of a sample of university students, which is always illegal in psychology research on any topic of study at all
- The use of a radioactive tracer, which exposes participants to a small amount of radiation that must be justified by the research
-
Which is a strength of brain-scanning techniques in biological psychology?
- They do not require any participants, since the brain can be scanned without any involvement from the person being studied
- They offer objective measures of brain structure or activity, which can be compared across participants and studies
- They avoid all practical issues, because the images are always perfectly clear and the scanner never produces artefacts or noise
- They show causation directly, since a scan proves that the activated area is the single cause of the observed behaviour
-
Which limitation of brain scanning is most relevant when using it to explain aggression?
- Scans always produce results that exactly match the behaviour of individual participants, which means that they are too precise
- Scans show correlation rather than causation, so an active region during aggression does not prove it causes the aggression
- Scans can only measure the blood pressure of the participant, which is unrelated to the function of any part of the brain
- Scans cannot show which brain regions are active, so they are unable to provide any information about brain function at all
-
A twin study reports a concordance rate of 50% for aggression in MZ twins and 20% in DZ twins. Which conclusion is best supported?
- Genes may contribute to aggression, since MZ twins are more similar than DZ twins, but the environment also plays a role
- Aggression is entirely genetic, because MZ twins share some of the trait in the study, which proves full heritability
- Aggression is entirely environmental, since DZ twins show lower concordance and therefore cannot share any genetic influence
- The study shows no genetic or environmental influence, because concordance rates are always equal in twin studies of any trait
-
Gottesman and Shields (1966) used twin data to study schizophrenia. Which feature of twin research does their work illustrate?
- That twin studies can only be conducted with adult participants who have been raised apart since birth in different homes
- That twin studies can only be used for aggression, and cannot be applied to any mental health disorder or clinical condition
- That twin studies always show that the disorder has no genetic basis, because twins never share the same illness
- That twin studies can estimate genetic contribution to a disorder by comparing concordance in MZ and DZ twins
-
Why might an adoption study be a stronger design than a twin study for separating genes from environment?
- Because adoption studies are always randomised, so the selection of children into families is controlled by the researcher
- Because adoption studies do not require any measurement of behaviour, so they avoid the problem of measuring traits accurately
- Because adopted children always share their genes with their adoptive parents, so the two sources of influence are confused
- Because adoption studies separate biological relatives from the rearing environment, which avoids equal environment assumptions
-
A critic argues that adoption studies are limited because adoption agencies place children selectively. What does this criticism mean?
- Adoptive families may differ systematically from the general population, so the sample may not represent typical families
- Adoption agencies only place children who are already aggressive, so the adopted sample always shows aggression at the start
- Children are placed in families at random, so the study has no problems with its sampling and generalises to all children
- Adoption agencies always place children with biological relatives, so no adoptive environment is ever truly independent of genes
-
Which statement best describes the difference between PET and fMRI scans?
- PET measures electrical signals at the scalp, while fMRI measures radioactive tracers injected into the bloodstream of participants
- PET and fMRI both use X-rays to produce images of the brain, differing only in the speed at which each scan can be completed
- PET measures structure and fMRI measures activity, which is the reverse of how each scanner is typically used in research
- PET uses a radioactive tracer to show activity; fMRI detects blood oxygen changes with magnetic fields
-
A researcher wants to examine whether brain activity in the prefrontal cortex differs between aggressive and non-aggressive participants. Which technique is most suitable for showing activity during a task?
- fMRI, because it shows blood-oxygen changes linked to activity during the task, with good spatial detail of the cortex
- A skull X-ray, because it shows the thickness of the prefrontal bone, which reflects the amount of activity in the region
- A blood test for testosterone, because the hormone level directly shows which regions of the cortex are most active
- CAT, because it produces a structural image of the prefrontal cortex that shows which regions are working during the task
-
Which combination of features best describes a monozygotic twin study?
- Twins share essentially all their genes and are always of the same sex, which allows genetic influence to be estimated
- Twins share about half their genes and are always of different sexes, which is used to separate sex from genetic influence
- Twins share all their genes only if they are raised in the same home, so the environment changes their genetic makeup
- Twins share no genes at all, because they are raised in the same home, so the environment is the only influence on them
-
An adoption study finds that children adopted in infancy show similar levels of aggression to their biological mothers, even though they were not raised by them. What does this best demonstrate?
- That the adoptive environment has no effect at all on any child's behaviour, since genes always fully determine aggression
- That aggression is purely learned from the adoptive family, since the biological mother had no direct contact with the child
- That children always copy their biological mothers, because they observe them during the first days of life in hospital
- That genetic factors likely contribute to aggression, since resemblance to a biological relative persists despite different upbringing
Related quizzes
- Neurons, neurotransmitters and recreational drugs Quiz · 3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Brain structure and aggression Quiz · 3.1.2 · 20 questions
- Evolution, natural selection and hormones Quiz · 3.1.3 · 20 questions
- Biological versus Freudian explanations of aggression Quiz · 3.1.4 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in biological psychology Quiz · 3.1.5 · 20 questions
- Correlational research and Spearman's rho Quiz · 3.2.1 · 20 questions
- Raine, Li, Brendgen and Van den Oever biological studies Quiz · 3.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: drug therapy and nature versus nurture in aggression Quiz · 3.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in biological psychology Quiz · 3.6.1 · 20 questions
- Theories of obedience: agency theory and social impact theory Quiz · 1.1.1 · 20 questions