Lesson 3.1.5
3.1.5 Individual and developmental differences in biological psychology Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.1.5, Individual and developmental differences in biological psychology: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 3: Biological psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Case studies of brain-damaged patients often assume that brain organisation is the same in everyone. Why is this assumption a problem?
- Because brain damage always produces identical effects in every person, so case studies can never reveal anything of use
- Because case studies only use women, whose brain organisation differs so much from men's that results cannot be compared
- Because brain organisation is set entirely by the environment after birth, so it cannot be compared between any two people
- Because brain organisation varies between people, the same damage may have different effects on each
-
Which factor is an example of an individual difference that may affect how a brain-damaged patient recovers?
- The day of the week on which the injury occurred, which determines permanently the functions that will later be lost
- The patient's height, which directly controls the number of neurons that remain available after a brain injury occurs
- The patient's age, handedness and pre-existing brain organisation, which can influence the extent of recovery after injury
- The colour of the patient's eyes, which has been shown to predict the location of language functions in the brain
-
Freud's view of personality suggests that individual differences arise because:
- the balance between id, ego and superego develops differently in each person, depending on early experiences and parenting
- the superego is inherited unchanged from parents, so all children develop an identical moral code from birth onwards
- the ego is fully formed at birth and does not change with age, experience or the environment in which a child grows up
- the id is identical in all people, so differences in behaviour come only from differences in the strength of conscious intelligence
-
Which statement best describes the role of evolution in human development, as applied in biological psychology?
- Development is shaped by traits that were selected because they supported survival and reproduction in ancestral environments
- Development is controlled entirely by conscious choice, and evolution has no influence on childhood growth or behaviour
- Development is determined only by the parents' social class, which evolved independently of any biological pressures
- Development is entirely random, so evolution plays no role in explaining why certain behaviours appear at certain ages
-
Which of these is an example of the role of hormones in human development?
- Speaking a second language, which depends mainly on the age at which a child is first exposed to a new vocabulary
- Learning to read, when a child begins to receive formal instruction from teachers in a classroom with other pupils
- Puberty, when rising sex hormones drive growth spurts and secondary sex characteristics
- Forming friendships, which depends mainly on the number of hours a child spends playing with peers after school
-
A brain-damaged patient recovers more fully than expected. Which individual difference is the most plausible explanation for this?
- The patient's memory of the injury was faulty, which meant the damage was never actually present in the brain at all
- The patient's family refused to allow any treatment, which caused the brain to reorganise itself in a spontaneous manner
- The patient's damage was smaller than the original estimate, which proves that brain plasticity never occurs in any individual
- The patient had brain plasticity that allowed other regions to take over some lost functions, for example because of age
-
Why might a child recover more from brain injury than an adult with a similar injury?
- Children have greater brain plasticity, so their developing neural networks can reorganise more readily after damage
- Children have no brain plasticity at all, so recovery depends entirely on the child's wider social environment and support
- Children have the same plasticity as adults, so age makes no difference to the extent of recovery after brain injury
- Children have less brain plasticity, so their neural networks are less able to reorganise after damage occurs to them
-
Which best describes an individual difference in Freud's account of aggression?
- Aggression is caused by the id in all people equally, so no individual differences exist in aggressive tendencies at all
- Every person develops an identical superego, so all individuals feel the same degree of guilt after acting aggressively
- People with different early experiences of parenting may develop different superegos, leading to different levels of guilt
- The ego is absent in children, so every child is equally likely to show aggression regardless of their upbringing and care
-
Which evaluation point about individual differences in biological psychology is most accurate?
- Because brain organisation varies, studies that ignore individual differences risk generalising results that do not apply to everyone
- Because individual differences are caused only by the environment, biological research cannot contribute to understanding them at all
- Because individual differences are always the same across people, researchers need not measure them in their own samples at all
- Because individual differences are never found in biological psychology, all studies can safely generalise to the whole population
-
A study uses a single patient with lesion damage to the left temporal lobe and concludes that a language function is located there in everyone. Which criticism is most valid?
- The study is valid only if the patient was a child, because adult brains are never organised in a way that supports language
- The study is valid because one case is always enough to establish a universal location of a function in the human brain
- The study is invalid because language functions cannot be located in the brain by any method, including brain scanning
- The study has ignored individual differences, since brain organisation may differ, so the finding may not generalise to others
-
Which of the following is a developmental application of the biological account of aggression?
- Explaining why testosterone rises at puberty may contribute to changes in dominance and aggression during adolescence
- Explaining why children prefer certain foods because of a learned association with the colour and taste of the food
- Explaining why adults form strong attachments to their partners because of conscious decisions made in early adulthood
- Explaining why children learn to read at a particular age through the reinforcement of correct answers in school
-
An evolutionary developmental account proposes that a childhood behaviour is an adaptation. Which feature would support this view?
- The behaviour is found only in one small family and was learned from a single individual who had unusual experiences
- The behaviour disappears completely in adulthood and has no function in the survival of individuals or their groups
- The behaviour depends entirely on conscious choice and has no biological basis at any stage of the child's development
- The behaviour appears across many different cultures and is linked to survival or reproductive problems faced by ancestors
-
A researcher argues that individual differences in aggression might be partly due to genes and partly due to hormone levels. Which is the best description of this view?
- An interactionist account in which biological factors contribute to individual differences, though environment may also shape them
- A purely environmental account in which hormones and genes are irrelevant, so differences come only from learned behaviour
- A purely Freudian account in which the superego alone determines all differences in aggression between individuals
- A cognitive account in which differences in aggression are caused by different beliefs about the value of violence in society
-
Which statement about individual and developmental differences is an accurate criticism of biological explanations?
- They tend to deny that any differences exist between children and adults, so they cannot account for development at all
- They tend to focus entirely on the social environment and ignore the role of genes and hormones in any aspect of behaviour
- They tend to overlook how environmental and social experiences can change biological processes across development
- They tend to accept that every person is biologically identical, which removes any need to study differences in behaviour
-
In a study of brain-damaged patients, which design feature would best help to address individual differences?
- Testing only patients who share the same type of injury and background, so that all differences between them are removed
- Using a single very unusual patient, so that the results are highly specific to one individual and clearly described
- Including several patients with different ages and backgrounds, and comparing their outcomes to see whether results are consistent
- Relying on the memories of family members about the patient's abilities before the injury, since these are always accurate
-
A researcher concludes from a study of puberty that all adolescents become more aggressive once testosterone rises. What is the main weakness of this conclusion?
- It is irrelevant, because adolescence is a period in which hormones have no measurable effect on behaviour of any kind
- It ignores individual differences, since not all adolescents respond to hormones in the same way, and environment also matters
- It is unfalsifiable, because no study of puberty can ever measure testosterone accurately enough to produce any usable data
- It is correct, because hormones always cause aggression in every adolescent regardless of their upbringing or social setting
-
Which is the strongest reason developmental research in biological psychology uses longitudinal designs?
- Longitudinal designs are cheaper than any other design, so they allow researchers to study many more children at one time
- Longitudinal designs track the same individuals over time, so changes in hormones and behaviour can be linked within each person
- Longitudinal designs avoid all ethical issues, because participants are never asked to give informed consent in any study
- Longitudinal designs always produce results that match the average, so they remove all individual variation from the data
-
Why might a biological explanation of individual differences in aggression be considered reductionist?
- Because it reduces the importance of hormones, which means that the research cannot explain why puberty ever occurs in people
- Because it reduces the amount of brain tissue in the sample, which means that the research cannot measure any individual person
- Because it reduces the number of participants needed in a study, so the results are based on too few cases to be reliable
- Because it reduces the complex variation in aggression to a small number of physiological factors and ignores social context
-
Which statement about developmental plasticity of the brain is most accurate?
- Plasticity is greatest in early development, but it continues in adults to a more limited extent, varying between individuals
- Plasticity does not exist, since the brain is fixed at birth and cannot reorganise in response to any damage that occurs later
- Plasticity is the same at every age, so a child and an adult with the same damage always recover at the same rate
- Plasticity is found only in the spinal cord and never in the brain, so it cannot affect recovery from any form of injury
-
A psychologist designs a study on developmental differences in biological psychology. Which ethical concern is most relevant when studying children with brain damage?
- The need to obtain informed consent from a parent or guardian, and to protect the child's wellbeing throughout the study
- The need to avoid any use of scanning, since children never have brains that are capable of producing usable scan images
- The need to conduct the study only in a laboratory, since children with brain damage should never be seen in any real setting
- The need to pay children in sweets for taking part, since this is the only legal form of compensation for participants
Related quizzes
- Neurons, neurotransmitters and recreational drugs Quiz · 3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Brain structure and aggression Quiz · 3.1.2 · 20 questions
- Evolution, natural selection and hormones Quiz · 3.1.3 · 20 questions
- Biological versus Freudian explanations of aggression Quiz · 3.1.4 · 20 questions
- Correlational research and Spearman's rho Quiz · 3.2.1 · 20 questions
- Brain scanning, twin and adoption studies Quiz · 3.2.2 · 20 questions
- Raine, Li, Brendgen and Van den Oever biological studies Quiz · 3.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: drug therapy and nature versus nurture in aggression Quiz · 3.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in biological psychology Quiz · 3.6.1 · 20 questions
- Theories of obedience: agency theory and social impact theory Quiz · 1.1.1 · 20 questions