Lesson 1.1.4
1.1.4 Explanations of prejudice: social identity and realistic conflict theory Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 1.1.4, Explanations of prejudice: social identity and realistic conflict theory: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 1: Social psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
In social identity theory, what is the first stage in the process that can lead to prejudice?
- Social comparison, in which people rank their own group against others on valued dimensions
- Social categorisation, in which people sort themselves and others into groups
- Positive distinctiveness, in which the in-group is seen as better than the out-group in some respect
- Realistic competition, in which two groups fight over a resource that both want to control
-
Which three processes make up Tajfel and Turner's social identity theory?
- Social loafing, social facilitation and social conformity
- Social categorisation, social identity and social comparison
- Attribution, reinforcement and classical conditioning
- Realistic conflict, superordinate goals and contact hypothesis
-
What is the minimal group paradigm, used by Tajfel?
- A study in which participants compete for money, showing that real conflict is the only cause of prejudice
- A procedure in which people are divided into groups on trivial criteria, showing in-group favouritism even then
- A procedure in which participants are placed in one large group with no categories, showing no bias at all
- A laboratory test of memory, in which participants recall words from lists assigned to different groups
-
According to realistic conflict theory (Sherif, 1966), what is the main cause of prejudice?
- Competition between groups for scarce resources that both groups want to obtain
- A genetic predisposition to dislike people who look different from oneself in appearance
- The need for individuals to protect their own self-esteem by blaming others for their failures
- A lack of contact between people of different backgrounds, which leads to fear of the unknown
-
Which of these would reduce conflict between groups according to realistic conflict theory?
- Separating the groups completely so that they never meet and never need to compete for anything at all
- Superordinate goals, which require both groups to work together to achieve something neither can achieve alone
- Increasing competition, since groups that compete for prizes learn to respect each other more over time
- Giving one group sole control over all the resources, which removes any reason for the other to compete
-
Which statement best describes positive distinctiveness in social identity theory?
- People seek to see their own group as better than other groups, which boosts self-esteem
- People show no preference for their own group when it is compared with another group on any dimension
- People avoid any comparison with other groups, so that they never feel inferior or superior to anyone
- People try to blend in with other groups so that they are no longer identified as members of their own
-
A researcher finds that people who have been divided into arbitrary groups favour their own group in rewards. Which theory does this support?
- Agency theory, since participants were following the instructions of an authority figure in the study
- Social identity theory, since in-group favouritism appeared even on arbitrary and trivial criteria
- Realistic conflict theory, since the groups were competing for scarce resources in the research design
- Social impact theory, since the number of group members affected how much reward each person received
-
Which concept links prejudice to self-esteem in social identity theory?
- Self-esteem falls when people join any group, which is why they avoid group membership wherever possible
- Self-esteem has no link to group membership, since people judge themselves only on individual achievements
- Prejudice causes self-esteem to rise only when a person is physically attacked by members of a rival group
- Group membership boosts self-esteem, so people defend their group and devalue out-groups to keep their status
-
What does Sherif (1966) mean by realistic conflict?
- Conflict within a single group, caused by disagreement between members about how to organise tasks
- Conflict between an individual and their own conscience, caused by a clash of personal values
- Real and tangible competition between groups over resources that both groups value and want
- Imagined disagreement between groups over beliefs that are not based on any real competition at all
-
Which evaluation point is most relevant to the two theories of prejudice in this topic?
- Realistic conflict theory explains prejudice without any competition, while social identity needs real rivalry
- Both theories are based only on animal research, so neither has any relevance to human prejudice at all
- Social identity theory explains prejudice without needing real competition, while realistic conflict requires competition
- Both theories claim prejudice is always genetic, so neither can explain prejudice in any environment at all
-
Which is the most accurate evaluation of social identity theory as an explanation of prejudice?
- It explains all prejudice perfectly, so there are no limitations or gaps in the theory at all
- It explains how categorisation can lead to bias, but may underplay real competition and individual differences
- It relies on a single, well-replicated experiment, so its conclusions about prejudice are beyond any doubt
- It is based on animal research and therefore cannot be applied to the study of any human social behaviour
-
A group of students is divided at random into 'Blues' and 'Reds', and each group is then asked to share rewards. Which result would fit social identity theory?
- Students allocate more reward to members of the other group to show that they are not biased in any way
- Students refuse to allocate any reward at all, because group membership removes all motivation to share
- Students allocate rewards equally to both groups, showing that group membership has no effect on decisions
- Students allocate more reward to members of their own group than to members of the other group
-
Which of these is an example of a realistic conflict in the Robbers Cave study?
- Two groups of boys each choosing a name for their group, with no competition for any prize
- Two groups of boys competing for prizes in tournaments, creating hostility between them
- Two groups of boys listening to the same story, with no reason to compete for anything at all
- Two groups of boys sharing a meal together, with equal access to all the food on the table
-
In social identity theory, what is social comparison?
- Comparing the physical appearance of two individuals in the same group to decide who is more attractive
- Evaluating one's own group against other groups, usually on dimensions that matter for the group's identity
- Comparing the amount of money two individuals earn in different jobs to decide who is more successful
- Comparing the speed of two runners in a race to determine which person is more physically fit overall
-
Which combination best describes the two explanations of prejudice in this specification?
- Social identity theory focuses on competition for resources; realistic conflict focuses on group membership and self-esteem
- Both focus only on the biology of the brain, such as neurotransmitters, and ignore social factors completely
- Both focus only on individual personality traits, such as authoritarianism, and ignore groups completely
- Social identity theory focuses on group membership and self-esteem; realistic conflict focuses on competition for resources
-
Which approach would a psychologist use to reduce prejudice, based on realistic conflict theory?
- Make the groups compete more fiercely so that they learn to value each other through hard-fought rivalry
- Ensure the groups never meet, so that they have no chance to develop any form of hostility or conflict
- Give one group permanent control over the resources, so that the other group stops competing for them
- Create superordinate goals that both groups must work towards together, so that they cooperate
-
Which concept describes the tendency to see one's own group as more favourable than other groups?
- Cognitive dissonance, in which people change their attitudes to reduce conflict between beliefs and actions
- Conformity to the majority, in which people change their answers to match the answers of the people around them
- Diffusion of responsibility, in which people feel less personal responsibility when others are present nearby
- In-group favouritism, sometimes linked to positive distinctiveness in social identity theory
-
In the minimal group paradigm, what criterion was used to divide participants?
- A medical criterion, such as blood type, which determined the group that each participant was placed in
- A trivial criterion, such as a preference for one painter over another, with no real competition
- A physical criterion, such as height, which divided participants into tall and short groups for the study
- A real competition for money, in which participants fought over a limited prize from the researcher
-
Which of these would a realistic conflict theorist predict would increase hostility between two groups?
- Shared goals that both groups must achieve together and that neither can achieve on its own
- Competition for a limited resource that both groups want and cannot both fully obtain
- Regular joint activities that have no link to any resource, so the groups have no reason to compete
- Equal status for both groups, with no competition for any resource that either group values
-
A student says prejudice is caused by people wanting to protect their self-esteem through their group. Which theory is this?
- Realistic conflict theory, which links prejudice only to competition for resources between groups
- Social impact theory, which links prejudice only to the number of people who are present in a situation
- Agency theory, which links prejudice only to the legitimacy of an authority figure giving instructions
- Social identity theory, which links group membership with self-esteem and in-group favouritism
Related quizzes
- Theories of obedience: agency theory and social impact theory Quiz · 1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Milgram's obedience research and variation studies Quiz · 1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting obedience and dissent Quiz · 1.1.3 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting prejudice and discrimination Quiz · 1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in obedience and prejudice Quiz · 1.1.6 · 20 questions
- Self-report design: questionnaires, interviews and sampling Quiz · 1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Analysing social psychology data and BPS ethics Quiz · 1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Sherif's Robbers Cave, Burger, Reicher and Haslam, and Cohrs studies Quiz · 1.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: applying social psychology to society Quiz · 1.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in social psychology Quiz · 1.6.1 · 20 questions