Lesson 1.1.3
1.1.3 Factors affecting obedience and dissent Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 1.1.3, Factors affecting obedience and dissent: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 1: Social psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which situational factor increased obedience in Milgram's research when the experiment was held in a prestigious setting?
- The time of day, since morning sessions produced more obedience than afternoon sessions did
- The colour of the walls, since bright colours made participants feel calmer during the procedure
- The size of the room, since a larger room made participants feel less observed by others
- The legitimacy of the setting, since a prestigious university made the authority seem more credible
-
Which individual difference is linked to obedience in the research on personality?
- Personality traits such as authoritarianism, which predict greater willingness to accept authority
- Handedness, since left-handed participants were much more likely to refuse instructions from experimenters
- Hair colour, which was shown to influence how people respond to instructions from authority figures
- Height, since taller people were consistently found to resist authority more often than shorter people
-
Bickman (1974) studied obedience in a field setting. What did the study find about uniforms?
- People were less likely to obey a request from someone in a uniform, as uniforms caused suspicion in strangers
- People were more likely to obey a request from someone in a uniform than from someone in ordinary clothes
- People obeyed only when the uniform was red, showing that colour rather than dress affected compliance
- People obeyed equally whether the requester wore a uniform or ordinary clothes, showing no effect of dress
-
Which statement about gender and obedience is best supported by the research described?
- Gender differences in obedience are small or inconsistent, so gender is not a strong predictor of obedience
- Women are always far more obedient than men across every study and every type of authority figure
- Men are always far more obedient than women across every study and every type of authority figure
- Gender has no effect on obedience at all, so the research cannot identify any individual difference
-
Which factor is most likely to reduce obedience according to Milgram's variation with two rebelling peers?
- Social support from dissenting peers, who model refusal and make disobedience seem acceptable
- A longer session, which tires participants and makes them accept the instructions more readily overall
- The presence of the experimenter in the room, which increases the participant's sense of legitimacy
- A higher voltage on the shock generator, which makes the participant feel more responsible for the learner
-
How does culture affect obedience according to the cross-cultural evidence on Milgram's research?
- Obedience is much higher in all collectivist cultures than in any individualist culture studied so far
- Obedience is much higher in individualist cultures than in collectivist ones in every replication study
- Obedience is unaffected by culture because it is entirely determined by the genes passed down in families
- Obedience rates have been found to be broadly similar across cultures, with some variation between studies
-
A researcher finds that obedience is higher when the authority is close and in charge of the situation. Which factor is this?
- Age, since close authority figures are always older than the participants in the study
- Personality, since close authority figures always attract participants with high levels of conscientiousness
- Proximity and the authority's position, which are situational factors that affect obedience
- Gender, since close authority figures are usually male and male participants obey them more readily
-
Which of these is an example of a situational factor that reduces dissent (resistance to obedience)?
- A research setting with a visible and open exit that allows the participant to leave at any time
- A dissenting peer who refuses to continue, showing that disobedience is possible in the situation
- An authority figure who is physically close and presents instructions as necessary for the study
- A participant who has a personality high in independence and self-direction in decision-making
-
A researcher argues that obedience results from a combination of personality and situation. Which view is this?
- A purely biological view, in which behaviour is caused only by neurotransmitters in the brain
- An interactionist view, in which personality and situation together influence behaviour
- A purely environmental view, in which behaviour is caused only by learning from reinforcement
- A purely cognitive view, in which behaviour is caused only by the conscious decisions a person makes
-
Which evaluation point is most relevant to research on individual differences in obedience?
- Individual differences research relies on the learner's responses, which are always reliable and valid
- Individual differences research is always experimental, so cause and effect are always established clearly
- Individual differences research can only use one participant at a time, so it is never generalisable at all
- Individual differences research may be correlational, so cause and effect cannot be established
-
Why might a participant who scores high on authoritarianism be more obedient in a laboratory study?
- Authoritarian individuals are always more intelligent, so they understand the study's purpose and comply with it
- Authoritarian individuals tend to accept the authority of those in charge and follow rules more readily
- Authoritarian individuals are always more sociable, so they obey whenever they are in a group of peers
- Authoritarian individuals are always more anxious, so they obey to avoid the discomfort of disagreeing with others
-
A participant refuses to continue at 150 volts. Which factor best explains this dissent?
- A combination of individual differences, such as independence, and situational pressure to refuse
- The participant is simply genetically unable to follow orders from any authority figure at all
- The participant was randomly assigned to a condition that always leads to refusal at this level
- The participant has no interest in the study and is therefore not affected by any factor in the situation
-
Which is the best description of 'dissent' in the context of obedience research?
- Full and immediate agreement with an authority figure's instructions, following them without question
- A general dislike of other people, which causes a person to avoid all social situations completely
- An emotional reaction to a learner, shown through crying but not through any change in behaviour
- Resistance to an authority figure's instructions, refusing to do what is asked
-
Which study used a field setting to examine obedience, rather than a laboratory?
- Milgram's telephonic instructions variation, which was run in a laboratory with an experimenter present
- A laboratory study of gender differences in obedience, which kept all participants in one controlled room
- Bickman's study of people responding to a requester in a uniform in an everyday setting
- Milgram's original baseline study, which was run in a laboratory at Yale University in New Haven
-
Which factor is least likely to increase obedience in the situations described?
- A legitimate authority figure in a prestigious setting, who presents the task as important for science
- A uniform worn by the requester, which signals legitimacy and increases compliance in everyday settings
- A dissenting peer who refuses to continue, which gives the participant a model of resistance
- A close and present authority figure who insists that the participant must continue with the procedure
-
A study finds that participants who are told the authority figure is an ordinary man obey less. What does this show?
- Obedience is unaffected by the authority figure's identity because the procedure is always the same
- Obedience is fixed by the participant's age and cannot be changed by the identity of the authority
- Perceived legitimacy of the authority figure is a key factor in whether people obey
- Obedience depends only on the number of learners present in the room during the procedure
-
In Milgram's research, what was the main purpose of the variation studies?
- To confirm that deception has no effect on participants and therefore can always be used in research
- To identify which situational factors increase or decrease obedience and dissent under controlled conditions
- To show that obedience is solely determined by the participant's education and social background
- To demonstrate that every participant will eventually reach the maximum shock level in any setting
-
Which evaluation of the individual differences in obedience research is most accurate?
- Findings on personality completely explain all obedience, leaving no role for situational factors at all
- Findings on personality show that obedience is impossible to predict from any individual difference at all
- Findings on personality prove that obedience is entirely inherited, so environment has no role to play
- Findings on personality may be useful, but personality explains only part of the variation in obedience
-
Which individual difference was found to vary between men and women in obedience research?
- Women consistently obeyed to the maximum level of shock in every replication, so men never obeyed at all
- Gender differences in obedience are small or inconsistent, so they are not a strong predictor on their own
- Men consistently obeyed to the maximum level of shock in every replication, so women never obeyed at all
- Gender had a very large effect in every study, with almost all women refusing to obey at the first prompt
-
In the research on situation, which factor is most likely to encourage obedience?
- A dissenting peer who refuses to continue, which gives the participant a model of how to resist the instructions
- A close, uniformed or prestigious authority who presents the task as legitimate and necessary
- A setting that is run-down and informal, which lowers the perceived legitimacy of the authority figure in the study
- A distant, anonymous authority who gives instructions by post and cannot be seen by the participant at all
Related quizzes
- Theories of obedience: agency theory and social impact theory Quiz · 1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Milgram's obedience research and variation studies Quiz · 1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Explanations of prejudice: social identity and realistic conflict theory Quiz · 1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting prejudice and discrimination Quiz · 1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in obedience and prejudice Quiz · 1.1.6 · 20 questions
- Self-report design: questionnaires, interviews and sampling Quiz · 1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Analysing social psychology data and BPS ethics Quiz · 1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Sherif's Robbers Cave, Burger, Reicher and Haslam, and Cohrs studies Quiz · 1.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: applying social psychology to society Quiz · 1.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in social psychology Quiz · 1.6.1 · 20 questions