Lesson 1.1.2
1.1.2 Milgram's obedience research and variation studies Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 1.1.2, Milgram's obedience research and variation studies: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 1: Social psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
How many male participants took part in Milgram's original obedience study of 1963?
- 20
- 100
- 40
- 60
-
What was the highest shock level on Milgram's shock generator?
- 300 volts
- 150 volts
- 600 volts
- 450 volts
-
In the original baseline study, what percentage of participants went to the maximum 450-volt level?
- 35%
- 65%
- 80%
- 50%
-
Who played the role of the 'learner' in Milgram's study?
- A trained actor who played the experimenter and gave all instructions to the participant
- A confederate who pretended to receive the shocks and gave scripted responses
- An assistant who recorded the participant's obedience score on a checklist during the trial
- A genuine volunteer who was paid to take real shocks at each level of the procedure
-
In Milgram's Experiment 10 (Rundown Office Block), what was changed from the baseline study?
- Participants were allowed to choose the shock level themselves at each stage of the procedure
- The learner was placed in the same room as the participant, so the two could see each other clearly
- The study took place in a run-down office building, which lowered the perceived legitimacy of the setting
- The experimenter was replaced by a recorded voice that delivered all of the instructions over a speaker
-
In Milgram's telephonic instructions variation (Experiment 7), what was changed?
- The participant was allowed to stop at any point and was paid for the time spent in the procedure
- Two peers in the room refused to continue, and the participant was then asked to follow their lead
- The learner was placed in the room with the participant, and was visible while receiving the shocks
- The experimenter gave instructions by telephone rather than being physically present in the room
-
In Milgram's 'Ordinary man gives orders' variation (Experiment 13), what changed?
- An ordinary man with no authority gave the orders instead of the experimenter in the lab coat
- The learner was given a higher voltage to receive, and the shock levels were increased in larger steps
- Two peers were placed in the room, and each refused to continue at the same point in the procedure
- The experimenter was replaced by a female assistant who gave all of the instructions to the participant
-
Why did Milgram vary the study in terms of setting, instructions and authority figure?
- To identify which situational factors increase or reduce obedience and dissent
- To test whether men and women show different levels of aggression when they are given orders
- To check whether the learner would eventually confess to being a confederate in the study
- To prove that all participants are equally obedient regardless of the situation they are placed in
-
Milgram's variations showed that obedience was affected by which type of factor?
- Only the participant's income, since wealthier participants were far more willing to follow orders
- Situational factors such as proximity, legitimacy of the setting and the presence of dissent
- Only genetic factors such as inherited personality, which cannot be changed by any situation
- Only the participant's age, since older participants always obeyed more than younger participants
-
If 30 of 40 participants had obeyed to 450 volts in a replication, what percentage is this?
- 65%
- 70%
- 75%
- 80%
-
Which ethical concern is most central to Milgram's obedience study?
- Deception and psychological harm to participants who believed they were giving painful shocks to another person
- Use of a double-blind design, which meant that neither the participant nor the experimenter knew the aims
- Recording the data on paper forms rather than on computers, which made later analysis more difficult
- Lack of informed consent for the learner, who had no information about the study's aims at all
-
Milgram's study is a laboratory experiment. Which evaluation is most accurate?
- Its findings cannot be generalised to any setting, because a laboratory has no link to everyday life
- It removes ethical issues entirely because the procedure was simulated and no one was harmed at all
- It is guaranteed to be ecologically valid because real shocks were delivered to the learner in every trial
- It gives strong control and supports causal conclusions, but its ecological validity may be limited
-
Which experiment in Milgram's programme involved two peers who refused to continue?
- Experiment 10, in which the study moved to a run-down office block in Bridgeport
- Experiment 7, in which the experimenter gave instructions by telephone rather than in person
- Experiment 17, in which two peers rebelled and obedience dropped sharply
- Experiment 13, in which an ordinary man rather than an experimenter gave the orders
-
A replication found that obedience was lower when the experimenter was absent from the room. What does this suggest?
- Participants obey only when they are paid, so the experimenter's presence has no effect on behaviour
- Obedience is fixed by genetics and cannot be changed by any feature of the room or the experimenter
- Obedience depends only on the age of the participant, so the experimenter's presence does not matter
- Proximity of the authority figure is a situational factor that affects how far people obey
-
Milgram's participants were all male in the original study. What is the main implication for generalising the findings?
- The findings are irrelevant because the study used a laboratory rather than a field setting
- The findings apply equally to all people, because gender has no effect on obedience in any situation
- The findings may not apply equally to women, so the sample limits generalisation to the whole population
- The findings show that women are always more obedient than men in any situation of authority
-
A student says Milgram's findings show obedience is caused by a single dispositional trait. Which response is most accurate?
- This is accurate, since the variations confirmed that personality alone explains the whole pattern of results
- This is accurate, since all participants showed the same personality trait in every variation of the study
- This is accurate, since the learner's responses were recorded and showed a stable trait of compliance
- This is an oversimplification, since the variations showed situational factors strongly affect obedience
-
Which of the following best describes Milgram's shock generator as used in the procedure?
- A fake device with 30 switches labelled from 15 volts up to 450 volts, with no real current delivered
- A device with 10 switches that delivered gentle vibrations rather than any electrical shock at all
- A real device delivering shocks of up to 450 volts to the learner in every trial of the procedure
- A computer program that displayed shock levels on a screen without any physical switches involved
-
Why did Milgram use a learner who was a confederate rather than a real participant?
- So that the participant would feel more guilty about harming a genuine person in the room during the study
- So that the study could be run more cheaply, since confederates do not need to be paid for their time at all
- So that the procedure could be standardised, with the learner's responses scripted in the same way for every participant
- So that the learner could give better answers to the word pairs, which increased the reliability of the scores
-
In Milgram's baseline procedure, what was the participant's role?
- The teacher, who read word pairs and administered shocks when the learner gave wrong answers
- The observer, who recorded the learner's answers on a form and never gave any shocks at all in the study
- The learner, who answered word pairs and was given real electric shocks by the experimenter in each trial
- The experimenter, who gave instructions to the teacher from a script in an adjoining room of the lab
-
Which statement about Milgram's variation studies is correct?
- They changed the sex of the participants in every condition, which was the only factor that was ever varied
- They removed the learner entirely from the procedure, so that participants gave no shocks in any condition
- They used a different laboratory in each condition, so the findings could not be compared across conditions
- They manipulated one situational factor at a time to see how it changed the level of obedience
Related quizzes
- Theories of obedience: agency theory and social impact theory Quiz · 1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting obedience and dissent Quiz · 1.1.3 · 20 questions
- Explanations of prejudice: social identity and realistic conflict theory Quiz · 1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting prejudice and discrimination Quiz · 1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in obedience and prejudice Quiz · 1.1.6 · 20 questions
- Self-report design: questionnaires, interviews and sampling Quiz · 1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Analysing social psychology data and BPS ethics Quiz · 1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Sherif's Robbers Cave, Burger, Reicher and Haslam, and Cohrs studies Quiz · 1.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: applying social psychology to society Quiz · 1.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in social psychology Quiz · 1.6.1 · 20 questions