Lesson 4.2.1
4.2.1 Absolute and relative poverty Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Economics A, Unit 4
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.2.1, Absolute and relative poverty: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Economics A (9EC0), Unit 4: Theme 4: A global perspective, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which best distinguishes absolute poverty from relative poverty?
- Absolute poverty is income below a fixed threshold needed for basic needs; relative poverty is income below a set share of typical income
- Absolute poverty only applies to rural areas, whereas relative poverty applies only to urban households in every country
- Absolute and relative poverty are the same concept, measured in different currencies in different countries
- Absolute poverty is income below the national average; relative poverty is income below a fixed subsistence threshold
-
Which measure is commonly used to define relative poverty in the UK?
- Households with no access to electricity, clean water or sanitation facilities in the home
- Households with income below a fixed amount of £1 a day, measured at market exchange rates each year
- Households whose members are unemployed for more than one year, regardless of their income
- Households with income below 60 per cent of median household income after housing costs
-
What is the relative poverty threshold if median household income is £30,000 and the line is 60 per cent of median?
- £18,000, since 0.6 x 30,000 = 18,000
- £30,000, since the threshold is set at the median and so is equal to the typical household income
- £15,000, since half of the median income is the common threshold for relative poverty in most countries
- £12,000, since 40 per cent of the median is taken as the relative poverty threshold in every country
-
Which is a measure of absolute poverty?
- The ratio of the richest 10 per cent of households' income to the poorest 10 per cent in the same country
- The share of the population living below a fixed income threshold such as an international dollar-a-day line
- The percentage of households with income below 60 per cent of the current median household income each year
- The share of total income received by the top 1 per cent of earners in a given economy and year
-
What is a likely cause of a fall in absolute poverty?
- A fall in government spending on social protection, which lowers the cost of living for poor households
- A rise in unemployment that reduces the number of households with any income at all in the economy
- A rise in the inflation rate that lowers the real value of incomes for all households in the economy
- Sustained economic growth that raises real incomes of the poorest above the fixed subsistence threshold
-
What is a likely cause of a rise in relative poverty in an economy whose average income is growing?
- A fall in the number of households below a fixed absolute poverty line, because the line moves in line with the median
- Income growth concentrated among higher earners, so the incomes of low earners fall further behind the median
- A fall in median income while the incomes of the poorest households grow faster than the median each year
- Income growth shared equally by all households, which keeps the distribution of income exactly the same as before
-
Median income rises by 10 per cent, while the incomes of the poorest households rise by only 2 per cent. What is the likely effect on the relative poverty rate?
- It is unchanged, because relative poverty depends only on absolute income thresholds set by the government
- It rises, because the relative threshold moves up faster than the incomes of the poorest households
- It falls to zero, because a rise in median income automatically removes everyone from relative poverty in a year
- It falls, because the relative threshold is fixed in real terms and the poorest households are richer in real terms
-
Which situation best illustrates absolute poverty falling while relative poverty rises?
- Real incomes of all households fall, but the median income falls even faster than the incomes of the poorest
- Real incomes of the poorest rise above the subsistence line, but the median rises faster and widens the gap in the distribution
- Inflation rises for all households, but the poorest households are shielded from it by wage indexation schemes
- Real incomes are unchanged for all households, but the number of people on benefits falls sharply in the year
-
Which factor is most likely to reduce the number of people in absolute poverty over the long term?
- A fall in access to clean water and healthcare, which reduces the number of people who can work productively
- A rise in population growth without any increase in output, which spreads incomes across more households
- A rise in the price of basic food, which reduces the spending of the poorest on goods and services they need
- Investment in education and infrastructure that raises productivity and incomes across the economy
-
A household's income rises from £6,000 to £7,500 a year, while the absolute poverty line is £7,000. What has happened?
- The household remains in absolute poverty, because the poverty line rises in line with any change in household income
- The household has moved above the absolute poverty line, having been below it before the rise
- The household has moved below the absolute poverty line, because its income has risen faster than the line
- The household is now at the median income of the economy, which removes it from relative poverty as well
-
Why might absolute poverty measures differ between countries?
- Thresholds are always set in the same currency at market exchange rates, so comparisons are always exact and direct
- Absolute poverty is not measurable, which is why all countries use the same relative threshold for their comparisons
- Absolute poverty is measured by the same method everywhere, so differences only reflect differences in population size
- Thresholds are set in different ways, and comparisons across countries often use purchasing power parity to adjust for living costs
-
Which is an advantage of using a relative poverty measure?
- It is unaffected by changes in the distribution of income, because it uses a fixed threshold in real terms
- It captures social exclusion and the ability to take part in society relative to others, which absolute measures can miss
- It requires no data on household incomes, since it is calculated from the number of people living in each region
- It always shows that poverty has fallen when average income rises, which is the most reliable sign of progress
-
Which is a limitation of an absolute poverty line?
- It counts only people with no income at all, so it never identifies anyone as being in poverty
- It shows that absolute poverty rises whenever any household's income increases by more than a small amount
- It is always measured in the local currency, so it cannot be compared between countries under any circumstances
- A single fixed line can understate hardship in richer countries, where people can be poor relative to peers
-
Which is the most accurate evaluation of using a 60 per cent of median line to measure poverty in a country where incomes are very unequal?
- The line may rise while the poorest gain little, so it can show relative poverty rising even when living standards improve
- The line always falls when inequality rises, so it shows that poverty declines whenever the rich become richer
- The line is unaffected by changes in income distribution, because it is calculated using the average income of all households
- The line shows exactly how many people need food aid, which makes it a complete measure of hunger in the population
-
Which statement about measuring poverty across countries is most accurate?
- Absolute poverty cannot be measured in developing countries at all, so only relative measures are used there
- Relative and absolute measures always agree on the number of people in poverty in every country and every year
- Relative and absolute measures give different pictures, so the choice of measure can change conclusions about trends
- Relative measures are only used by the World Bank and absolute measures only by national governments
-
The number of people below an absolute poverty line falls, but the share of income held by the bottom 20 per cent falls too. What does this suggest?
- Absolute poverty must have risen, because the share of income held by the poorest must always move in the same direction
- Inequality must have fallen, since a fall in the share of income of the bottom 20 per cent always reduces inequality
- Relative poverty must have fallen, because the bottom 20 per cent is always the group that defines the relative line
- Absolute poverty can fall while income inequality rises, so the two measures can move in different directions
-
Which factor could cause relative poverty to rise even when absolute poverty falls?
- A fall in median income that lowers the threshold by an equal amount for all households in the economy
- A fall in the number of households in full-time education, which reduces the income of the median household
- Faster income growth at the top of the distribution than at the middle and bottom, widening the gap to the median
- A rise in the number of households on the minimum wage, which automatically raises the relative poverty threshold
-
Which policy measure is most directly aimed at reducing relative poverty?
- A rise in indirect taxes on basic goods, which raises the revenue available for general government spending
- A flat tax rate that applies the same percentage to every household's income, regardless of its level
- Progressive taxation and transfer payments that redistribute income towards households at the bottom of the distribution
- A reduction in public spending on education and health, which lowers the taxes needed to fund those services
-
Which is a cause of a rise in absolute poverty?
- A recession that lowers real incomes and raises unemployment among the poorest households
- A fall in the price of basic food that raises the real purchasing power of the poorest households
- Economic growth that raises real incomes of the poorest households above the subsistence line each year
- Public spending on education that raises the skills and earnings of low-income workers over time
-
An absolute poverty line is $2.15 a day in real terms. A household's income was $1.80 a day and has risen to $2.40 a day. What is its status now?
- Still in absolute poverty, since $2.40 is less than the $2.15 line once the rise is expressed in cents
- Still in absolute poverty, since poverty lines always rise faster than household incomes in every country
- Not in absolute poverty, since $2.40 a day is above the fixed line of $2.15
- Not in relative poverty, since absolute poverty is always measured against the median income of the country
Related quizzes
- Globalisation Quiz · 4.1.1 · 20 questions
- Specialisation and trade Quiz · 4.1.2 · 20 questions
- Pattern of trade Quiz · 4.1.3 · 20 questions
- Terms of trade Quiz · 4.1.4 · 20 questions
- Trading blocs and the World Trade Organisation Quiz · 4.1.5 · 20 questions
- Restrictions on free trade Quiz · 4.1.6 · 20 questions
- Balance of payments Quiz · 4.1.7 · 20 questions
- Exchange rates Quiz · 4.1.8 · 20 questions
- International competitiveness Quiz · 4.1.9 · 20 questions
- Inequality Quiz · 4.2.2 · 20 questions