Lesson 4.1.6
4.1.6 Restrictions on free trade Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Economics A, Unit 4
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.1.6, Restrictions on free trade: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Economics A (9EC0), Unit 4: Theme 4: A global perspective, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which is a reason for restricting free trade?
- To remove all government revenue from taxes on goods that are traded across borders
- To increase the number of foreign firms competing in the domestic market for all goods
- To protect infant industries that cannot yet compete with established foreign producers
- To guarantee that all imports are cheaper than domestic goods in every market at all times
-
Which of the following is a tariff?
- A rule requiring imported goods to meet detailed safety and labelling standards before sale
- A tax on imported goods, which raises their price for domestic buyers
- A payment made by government to domestic producers for each unit they produce
- A limit on the physical quantity of a good that may be imported in a year
-
Which is a quota?
- A tax on each unit of a good that is imported into the domestic market from abroad
- A limit on the physical quantity of a good that can be imported in a given period
- A payment to domestic firms that lowers their costs of production and their selling prices
- A set of technical standards that foreign goods must meet before they are allowed on the market
-
Which is a subsidy to domestic producers?
- A requirement that foreign firms must share their technology with domestic partners before entering
- A payment from government per unit of output, which lowers the costs of domestic producers
- A ban on all imports of a particular good for a period of time to protect domestic firms
- A tax charged on each unit of a good imported from a foreign country into the domestic market
-
Which is an example of a non-tariff barrier?
- A limit of 500 units a year on the number of foreign cars that can enter the domestic market
- A tax of 10 per cent on all goods imported from a specified country into the domestic market
- Strict safety or labelling standards that foreign goods must meet before they can be sold domestically
- A direct payment from government to domestic producers for every unit of output they make in a year
-
A specific tariff of £2 per unit is imposed on an imported good whose world price is £10. What is the domestic price, before any change in demand?
- £20, since the tariff is doubled when it is applied to each imported unit in the domestic market
- £8, since the tariff reduces the price that importers receive for each unit they bring in
- £12, since the world price plus the tariff gives the domestic price
- £10, since tariffs are paid by foreign producers and so leave domestic buyers' prices unchanged
-
A quota cuts imports of a good from 100 units to 60 units a year. Which is the most likely effect on the domestic market?
- The domestic price falls and domestic producers sell less, while consumers buy more at the lower price
- The domestic price and quantity are both unchanged, because quotas do not affect the market at all
- Imports rise to 140 units, because quotas always encourage more foreign firms to enter the domestic market
- The domestic price rises and domestic producers sell more, while consumers buy less at the higher price
-
What is the most likely effect of a subsidy to domestic producers on the market for a good?
- Domestic supply expands and prices can fall, letting domestic firms compete more strongly with imports
- No change in supply, because subsidies affect only the government budget and never the behaviour of producers
- Domestic supply falls and prices rise, because subsidies always reduce the incentive to produce for the market
- Imports rise sharply, because subsidies make domestic goods more expensive than foreign goods in every market
-
Which is a likely effect of protectionist policies on consumers?
- Higher real incomes, because protection always increases the number of jobs in the domestic economy
- Lower prices and a wider range of products, because protection makes foreign goods cheaper for buyers
- No effect at all, because protection only changes the behaviour of producers and never affects buyers
- Higher prices and less choice, which reduce their real purchasing power
-
Which is a likely effect of protectionist policies on domestic producers?
- Protected firms lose all sales, because protection means they must compete directly with cheaper foreign producers
- Protected firms always become more efficient, because competition from imports is removed by the policy
- Protected firms face less competition and may sell more, but they may become less efficient over time
- Protected firms are forced to close, since protection always makes domestic production uncompetitive
-
Which is the likely effect of a tariff on government revenue?
- It always reduces government revenue, because tariffs are paid by foreign producers who then stop trading
- It always raises revenue by the same amount as the tariff rate, whatever happens to the volume of imports
- It raises revenue from the tariff, although revenue can fall if imports drop sharply
- It has no effect on government revenue, because tariffs are offset by the same amount in lower income taxes
-
A tariff is raised on a good with highly price-elastic demand. Which is the most likely effect on tariff revenue?
- Revenue rises sharply, because price-elastic demand means that imports are unaffected by any change in price
- Revenue rises by exactly the same proportion as the tariff rise, whatever the size of the fall in imports
- Revenue is unchanged, because price-elastic demand means that consumers always bear the full burden of the tariff
- Revenue may fall, because imports fall sharply and reduce the tax base to which the tariff applies
-
Which is an example of dumping?
- A foreign firm raising its export price to cover the tariff imposed by the importing country's government
- A foreign firm selling exports below its own cost or below its price in the home market to win market share
- A domestic firm disposing of unsold stock by giving it away to employees at no cost in the home market
- A government selling surplus food to other countries at a price above the world price for the same product
-
Which argument for protection is the most consistent with a long-run gain to the economy?
- Protection of declining industries with no prospect of recovery, so that jobs are kept at any cost to the economy
- Permanent protection of every industry, so that no domestic firm ever faces competition from foreign rivals again
- Protection of a domestic industry to raise prices for consumers, so that producers earn higher profits each year
- Temporary protection of an infant industry that can become competitive, so that future comparative advantage is developed
-
Why might a non-tariff barrier be harder to challenge than a tariff?
- It is always set at a higher level than any tariff, so the WTO has no power to review it at all
- It is presented as a health, safety or technical rule, so it can be hard to show it is a disguised trade restriction
- It applies only to services and never to physical goods, so WTO rules do not cover it at all
- It is always removed after a single year by law, so there is no need for any challenge to be made against it
-
Which is the best evaluation of protectionism as a policy to protect employment?
- It has no effect on employment, because jobs depend only on the exchange rate and never on trade policy
- It may save jobs in protected sectors, but higher prices and retaliation can cost jobs and reduce living standards elsewhere
- It guarantees full employment in all sectors, because foreign firms are then forced to hire domestic workers
- It always creates more jobs than free trade in every sector and region, with no costs to any other part of the economy
-
Which protectionist policy is most likely to raise domestic output without any direct cost to the government budget?
- A non-tariff barrier, since it requires the government to pay compensation to foreign producers each year
- A subsidy to domestic producers, since it costs the government nothing and raises domestic output directly
- A tariff, since it always costs the government more than a subsidy of the same size per unit of output
- A quota on imports, since it restricts supply from abroad without government spending on subsidies
-
Protection is often described as regressive. Why?
- Protection has no effect on any household, because it changes only the prices paid by businesses and never by consumers
- Protection lowers the price of goods for high-income households, who buy most of the imported goods in the market
- Protection increases the income of low-income workers in all sectors, which reduces poverty and inequality in the economy
- Higher prices on protected goods take a larger share of the income of low-income households, who spend more of their income on them
-
Which protectionist measure creates a 'quota rent' that accrues to importers or foreign suppliers rather than government?
- A subsidy, because the payment goes to foreign producers who are competing in the domestic market
- A non-tariff barrier, because the rules raise the costs for domestic consumers without any transfer at all
- A tariff, because the tax paid on each unit goes straight to foreign suppliers as extra profit
- A quota, because the limited supply raises prices that importers or licence holders can capture
-
Which is the best reason to be sceptical of the infant industry argument for protection?
- Governments may pick the wrong industries, and protection can persist after an industry has matured
- Infant industries never need protection, since new firms always have lower costs than established foreign rivals
- Protection always makes infant industries more efficient, so there is no reason to doubt the argument in any case
- The argument applies only to agriculture, so it cannot justify protection of manufacturing in any economy
Related quizzes
- Globalisation Quiz · 4.1.1 · 20 questions
- Specialisation and trade Quiz · 4.1.2 · 20 questions
- Pattern of trade Quiz · 4.1.3 · 20 questions
- Terms of trade Quiz · 4.1.4 · 20 questions
- Trading blocs and the World Trade Organisation Quiz · 4.1.5 · 20 questions
- Balance of payments Quiz · 4.1.7 · 20 questions
- Exchange rates Quiz · 4.1.8 · 20 questions
- International competitiveness Quiz · 4.1.9 · 20 questions
- Absolute and relative poverty Quiz · 4.2.1 · 20 questions
- Inequality Quiz · 4.2.2 · 20 questions