Lesson 4.3.8.3
4.3.8.3 Social psychological explanations of aggression Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.3.8.3, Social psychological explanations of aggression: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Psychology (7182), Unit 3: Issues and options in Psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What does the frustration-aggression hypothesis propose?
- Frustration has no link to aggression, which is caused only by hormones
- Aggression is always learned from observing others, with no role for frustration
- Frustration, meaning the blocking of a goal, always leads to some form of aggression
- Aggression always leads to frustration, which then blocks the person's goals
-
Which later modification to the frustration-aggression hypothesis is often cited?
- Frustration produces a readiness for aggression, which may or may not be expressed depending on cues
- Frustration always produces violence and no other response at any time
- Frustration has been removed entirely from the theory after experimental testing
- Frustration causes aggression only in women and never in men
-
What is social learning theory as applied to human aggression?
- Aggression is an innate fixed action pattern that cannot be changed by any experience
- Aggression is learned through observing and imitating models, particularly when the model is rewarded
- Aggression is caused by a deficiency of serotonin in the frontal lobe alone
- Aggression is the result of a fixed inherited trait that is unaffected by observation
-
In Bandura's Bobo doll study, what did children do after watching an adult behave aggressively toward the doll?
- They only imitated aggression when the adult was present in the room
- They imitated the aggressive behaviour, including novel aggressive acts
- They became fearful and avoided the doll for the rest of the session
- They ignored the doll entirely and played quietly with the other toys in the room
-
What is de-individuation?
- A loss of personal identity and self-awareness in a group, which can lead to uninhibited behaviour
- An increase in personal identity that makes a person more aware of their own rules
- A process in which a person becomes more cautious when they are alone in a room
- A process in which a child learns to separate from their parents at the age of three
-
Which factor is most associated with increased de-individuation in a crowd?
- Being alone and clearly identifiable by a name badge at all times
- Anonymity, such as being hidden by uniforms or masks
- Being in a quiet library with no other people present
- Being in a small group with a clear and visible leader
-
Which evaluation point applies to the frustration-aggression hypothesis?
- Frustration has no measurable effect on any behaviour in any species
- Frustration has been shown to lead only to calm and cooperative behaviour in all people
- Frustration always leads to aggression in every person and every culture studied
- Frustration does not always lead to aggression, so the link is not universal
-
Which evaluation point applies to Bandura's Bobo doll study?
- The study used a large sample of adults in a natural setting over many years, so its results are much stronger than most other research
- The study showed that children never imitate aggression under any circumstances, which means that the findings cannot be applied to them
- The study used an artificial laboratory setting, which limits generalisation to real-world aggression
- The study was carried out with no controls, so it cannot show any effect at all, and the results are therefore of no scientific value
-
A football fan throws objects during a match after his team loses, and says he was swept along with the crowd. Which explanation best fits?
- Biological explanation through a sudden rise in cortisol in the fan's blood
- Frustration-aggression with no role for the crowd, since the fan was alone
- De-individuation within the crowd, reducing self-awareness and accountability
- Taste aversion, since the fan has previously been ill after eating at the stadium
-
A child who has been blocked from playing a game becomes aggressive towards a sibling. Which explanation best fits the frustration-aggression hypothesis?
- Frustration from blocked goals led to aggression towards an available target
- Fixed action patterns triggered by the colour of the sibling's clothing
- Observational learning from a television programme that showed a calm character
- Neural damage in the frontal lobe that removed all social inhibition in the child
-
Which explanation describes how social learning theory predicts that a child might become aggressive?
- The child's frontal lobe is damaged, which removes all learned controls over behaviour
- The child's cortisol levels fall, which removes the ability to feel anger at all
- The child observes an aggressive model being rewarded and imitates the behaviour
- The child is born with a fixed pattern of aggression that is triggered by the sight of a bottle
-
Which evaluation point applies to social psychological explanations of aggression?
- They explain learned and situational aggression well but say less about biological predisposition
- They explain all human aggression completely, leaving no role for biology or learning
- They have been disproved by all research using animal models and human samples
- They focus only on innate fixed action patterns and never on social influence
-
Which best describes the role of anonymity in aggression according to de-individuation theory?
- Anonymity has no effect on aggression because people always behave the same way anyway
- Anonymity reduces the frustration that is needed for any aggression to occur
- Anonymity increases self-awareness, which makes people more careful about their behaviour
- Anonymity reduces the fear of being identified, which lowers inhibition and increases aggressive acts
-
A researcher finds that people who watch an aggressive film then behave more aggressively in a task. Which explanation best fits social learning theory?
- Observation of calm models led to imitation of aggressive behaviour in the same task
- Observation of aggressive models led to imitation and greater acceptance of aggressive responses
- Aggression is entirely innate and so the film cannot influence the participants
- The film triggered a fixed action pattern in every participant at the same moment
-
Which feature of Bandura's findings suggests that aggression is learned rather than innate?
- Children showed the same aggression before observing any adult model at all
- Children never imitated the adult and behaved identically in all conditions
- Children imitated behaviour they had only observed, including novel aggressive acts
- Children's aggression was shown to be unaffected by observing any model
-
A researcher suggests that frustration only produces aggression when a suitable cue, such as a weapon, is present. Which theory does this best reflect?
- A revised frustration-aggression account proposing that cues can trigger aggression from a state of readiness
- The original frustration-aggression hypothesis, which states that cues have no role at all
- Ethological theory, which states that cues have no role because all behaviour is innate
- Biological theory, which states that cues only affect hormone levels in the body
-
Why might de-individuation be relevant to riots?
- Riots are unrelated to group behaviour, since crowds never affect the behaviour of their members
- Riots involve only fixed action patterns triggered by the colour of uniforms
- Crowd anonymity and reduced self-awareness may lower inhibitions and increase aggressive acts
- Riots are caused by the sudden rise in cortisol during a crowd event with no other factor
-
In Bandura's studies, which condition was associated with the least imitation of aggression?
- Children who saw the model rewarded for the aggressive act with sweets
- Children who saw the model punished for the aggressive act
- Children who saw the model rewarded for playing quietly with the toys in the room
- Children who saw the model show no consequence after the aggressive act was performed
-
Which change would most reduce de-individuation in a crowd?
- Increasing the size of the crowd so that each person feels less responsible for the group
- Reducing the amount of light so that people cannot see one another clearly in the crowd
- Making each person more identifiable, for example by wearing name badges
- Increasing the anonymity of each person by having everyone wear identical masks and hats
-
A researcher predicts that aggression is more likely when a model's behaviour is seen to pay off. Which study design would test this?
- A correlation between children's height and the number of aggressive acts they perform in playground observation
- A survey of parents about their opinions on whether aggression is inherited from grandparents
- An experiment comparing children who see a rewarded model with children who see an unrewarded model, then measuring imitation
- A case study of one child's diary about the playground over a single school term
Related quizzes
- Gender and culture: universality and bias Quiz · 4.3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Free will and determinism Quiz · 4.3.1.2 · 20 questions
- The nature-nurture debate Quiz · 4.3.1.3 · 20 questions
- Holism and reductionism Quiz · 4.3.1.4 · 20 questions
- Idiographic and nomothetic approaches Quiz · 4.3.1.5 · 20 questions
- Social sensitivity in psychological research Quiz · 4.3.1.6 · 20 questions
- Attraction in romantic relationships Quiz · 4.3.2.1 · 20 questions
- Theories of romantic relationships and relationship breakdown Quiz · 4.3.2.2 · 20 questions
- Online and parasocial relationships Quiz · 4.3.2.3 · 20 questions
- Chromosomes, hormones and diversity in sex development Quiz · 4.3.3.1 · 20 questions