Lesson 4.1.1.4
4.1.1.4 Situational variables in obedience: Milgram's proximity, location and uniform Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.1.1.4, Situational variables in obedience: Milgram's proximity, location and uniform: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Psychology (7182), Unit 1: Introductory topics in Psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
In Milgram's baseline study, what percentage of participants were fully obedient, going to the maximum 450 volts?
- 40 per cent
- 65 per cent
- 30 per cent
- 0 per cent
-
What happened to obedience when the teacher and learner were in the same room?
- Obedience fell, to around 40 per cent in one variation
- Obedience rose to 100 per cent in every case
- Obedience was unchanged from the baseline
- Obedience fell to zero because participants refused completely
-
What happened when the teacher had to physically hold the learner's hand onto a shock plate?
- The learner was released immediately without any shocks
- Obedience increased to 90 per cent
- Obedience was unaffected by any physical contact
- Obedience fell further, to around 30 per cent
-
In Milgram's location variation, what happened when the study moved to a run-down office in Bridgeport?
- Obedience rose to 100 per cent because the setting felt less formal
- Obedience was identical to the Yale baseline in every way
- Obedience fell compared with the Yale laboratory baseline
- Participants refused to start the study at all
-
Why might a prestigious location such as Yale increase obedience?
- It makes the participants feel more relaxed so they stop questioning orders
- It means the participant is more likely to be paid
- It removes the learner from the room so there is no empathy
- It signals the legitimacy of the authority and the experiment's importance
-
Which situational variable links most closely to the perceived legitimacy of the experimenter?
- The shape of the shock generator's switches, which were labelled in a row across the front panel
- Uniform, such as a lab coat or other clothing that signals authority
- The number of learners in the study, which Milgram changed across several variations of the procedure
- Proximity, meaning how physically close the teacher is to the learner during the procedure
-
A study shows that people are more likely to obey a stranger who is dressed in a uniform. Which explanation best fits this result?
- Uniform signals legitimate authority, which increases obedience
- Uniform removes personal responsibility from the person giving orders
- Uniform makes the participant feel more closely connected to the stranger
- Uniform reduces the participant's need for information
-
Which result would best support the view that proximity reduces obedience?
- Obedience was lower when the teacher was close enough to see and touch the learner than when they were in another room
- Obedience was only affected by proximity when the experimenter was absent
- Obedience was the same whether the learner was close or far away
- Obedience was higher when the teacher was in another room than when they were close to the learner
-
Milgram's proximity findings can be compared as a series. Which order is correct from highest obedience to lowest?
- Same room, touch proximity, remote
- Remote, touch proximity, same room
- Remote, same room, touch proximity
- Touch proximity, same room, remote
-
A researcher argues that Milgram's location and proximity variations show situational rather than dispositional factors. Which conclusion is best supported?
- Obedience is caused entirely by the learner's behaviour
- Obedience depends only on the participant's age and gender
- Obedience is a fixed personality trait that cannot change with the situation
- Obedience changes with the situation, so it is not simply a fixed personality trait
-
Which evaluation point applies to Milgram's research on situational variables?
- The findings show that obedience is identical in all cultures
- The study was controversial and caused participants distress
- The research was conducted with millions of participants across many countries
- The study was based on a case study of one person
-
Which situation would be most likely to show obedience through the variable of proximity?
- A shopper obeys a sign more readily when it is placed far away from the till, where they can read it more easily
- A patient refuses medicine more often when a doctor is present in the room, since the doctor's presence seems less reassuring
- A student ignores a teacher's instruction more often when the teacher is in the same room, because the teacher can see them
- A worker follows a manager's instruction more readily when the manager is in the same room than when instructions are sent by email
-
In Milgram's study, what proportion of participants continued to the maximum level when the learner was in another room and the experimenter was present?
- Around 65 per cent
- Around 5 per cent
- Around 25 per cent
- Around 100 per cent
-
Which statement about the situational variables in Milgram's research is accurate?
- Obedience varied with proximity and location, showing that the situation matters for obedience
- Obedience did not vary with any of the situational variables tested, because the same participants always responded in the same way
- Obedience was affected only by the learner's voice and not by the setting, so the room itself had no influence on participants
- Obedience increased whenever the learner was in the same room, since the participant could see the learner's distress directly
-
A psychologist tests whether a dispositional or situational explanation of obedience is more useful. Which finding would best support the situational view?
- Participants who were tested at Yale always refuse to obey, because the prestige of the setting makes them more critical
- Participants of different ages obey in exactly the same way, so age has no influence on how they respond to the experimenter
- Changing the location of a study changes the level of obedience shown by the same type of participant
- Participants with the same personality traits always obey to the same level, whatever the setting or the instructions given
-
A study measures obedience in two conditions: the experimenter giving orders in person and by telephone. Which prediction is most consistent with Milgram's variables?
- Obedience will be zero in both conditions
- Obedience will be higher when the experimenter is present in person
- Obedience will be identical because proximity has no effect on authority
- Obedience will be higher by telephone, because the experimenter cannot see the participant
-
A researcher argues that Milgram's results show that people are not simply cruel. Which finding would best support this argument?
- Obedience fell when the learner was close, suggesting that many participants found harming a person difficult
- Participants showed no reaction to the learner's protests, and so the closeness of the learner made no difference at all
- Obedience rose to 100 per cent when the learner was close, because participants wanted to show the experimenter their loyalty
- Obedience was highest when participants were most distressed, since distress made them more likely to follow instructions
-
In the Bridgeport variation, what is the best explanation for the reduction in obedience?
- The lower status setting reduced the perceived legitimacy of the experiment
- Participants were given a choice to stop at any point without penalty
- The shock generator stopped working in the new setting
- The learner was no longer present, so there was nothing to obey
-
Which combination of variables is correct for Milgram's situational variables in the specification?
- Location, learning history and age
- Proximity, location and uniform
- Uniform, religion and language
- Proximity, personality and gender
-
A study finds that obedience is higher in a setting that signals authority than in a setting that does not. Which situational variable is most likely at work?
- Proximity
- Minority influence
- Locus of control
- Location
Related quizzes
- Types of conformity: internalisation and compliance Quiz · 4.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Explanations for conformity and Asch's variables Quiz · 4.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Explanations for obedience: agentic state and legitimacy of authority Quiz · 4.1.1.3 · 20 questions
- Authoritarian Personality Quiz · 4.1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Resisting social influence and minority influence Quiz · 4.1.1.6 · 20 questions
- Multi-store model of memory Quiz · 4.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Working memory model Quiz · 4.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Explanations for forgetting: interference and retrieval failure Quiz · 4.1.2.3 · 20 questions
- Eyewitness testimony and the cognitive interview Quiz · 4.1.2.4 · 20 questions
- Animal studies of attachment: Lorenz and Harlow Quiz · 4.1.3.1 · 20 questions