Lesson 4.1.2.3
4.1.2.3 Explanations for forgetting: interference and retrieval failure Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.1.2.3, Explanations for forgetting: interference and retrieval failure: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Psychology (7182), Unit 1: Introductory topics in Psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Proactive interference occurs when which of these happens?
- Newer learned information interferes with the recall of older information
- Older learned information interferes with the recall of newer information
- Information is lost from the sensory register within a fraction of a second
- Information is lost because it is not matched by a suitable retrieval cue
-
Retroactive interference occurs when which of these happens?
- Old information blocks the learning of new information, so the later material cannot be stored properly at all
- New information interferes with the recall of older information already stored
- Cues present at learning are missing at recall, so the stored material cannot be accessed by the person later
- Information decays over time without any interference, so the loss is caused entirely by the passage of time
-
Retrieval failure is best defined as forgetting caused by which of these?
- The decay of memory traces over time
- Similar material learned earlier blocking recall
- A lack of attention at the time of learning
- The absence of the cues needed to access stored information
-
Which condition is most likely to produce interference between two sets of learned material?
- The two sets were learned with a long gap between them
- The two sets are similar in content, so they compete for recall
- The two sets are very different in content, so they are kept apart
- The two sets were learned in different rooms from where recall takes place
-
Tulving and Pearlstone (1966) found that recall of words improved when participants were given which of these at recall?
- Feedback after each word was recalled
- The words presented in alphabetical order
- Extra time to study the list before recall
- Category names as cues
-
Which of these is the best example of retrieval failure rather than interference?
- A student forgets the title because they learned several similar film titles that week
- A student forgets the title because it faded from memory after a month
- A student recalls the title but confuses it with a similarly named film watched earlier
- A student cannot name a film unprompted but recalls its title when shown the poster
-
A student remembers a fact in a classroom but cannot recall it in the exam hall. Which explanation fits best?
- Retroactive interference, because the exam hall is new information
- Decay, because the fact has been lost from the sensory register
- Proactive interference, because old classroom knowledge blocks the fact
- Retrieval failure, because the cues from the classroom are missing in the exam hall
-
A learner studies Spanish vocabulary, then French vocabulary, and finds the Spanish words harder to recall later. Which explanation fits best?
- Proactive interference, because the older Spanish words block recall of the newer French words
- Retroactive interference, because the newer French words disrupt recall of the older Spanish words
- Retrieval failure, because the Spanish cues are absent in France
- Decay, because the Spanish words have simply faded with time
-
Group A learns list X and then list Y. Group B learns only list Y. Group A recalls list Y less well than group B. What does this show?
- Retrieval failure, because group A had fewer retrieval cues for list Y
- Proactive interference, because earlier learning of list X disrupts recall of list Y
- Decay, because group A waited longer before recall
- Retroactive interference, because list Y disrupts recall of list X
-
Which of these is an example of a retrieval cue that could reduce retrieval failure?
- Being in the same room where the information was learned
- Recalling the information many years later
- Learning a larger number of items in a single session
- Studying the material in a noisy environment
-
In an experiment, participants recall 24 of 40 words in free recall and 34 of 40 words in cued recall. What is the difference between the two conditions in percentage points?
- 25 percentage points
- 15 percentage points
- 10 percentage points
- 34 percentage points
-
Which evaluation point applies to much of the research on interference?
- Much of the evidence comes from artificial lab tasks, such as learning word lists
- The evidence shows that interference only affects younger children
- The evidence is based entirely on case studies of people with brain damage
- The evidence shows that interference cannot be studied in a laboratory at all
-
Which limitation applies to explaining all forgetting in terms of retrieval failure?
- It does not explain forgetting when the right cues are present but the memory is still not recalled
- It shows that all forgetting is caused by interference, so no other explanation of forgetting is needed in psychology
- It cannot explain any forgetting in cued recall tasks, because cues always help people recall every item they learned
- It applies only to information stored in the sensory register, which decays within a fraction of a second of exposure
-
Which finding would best support the view that interference is a better explanation of forgetting than simple decay?
- Forgetting increases with time even when no other material is learned, showing that decay alone explains all loss
- Forgetting is greater when similar material is learned before or after the target material
- Forgetting only happens when the person is tired or unwell, so the material itself has no influence on what is lost
- Forgetting is the same whatever material is learned, since the amount forgotten depends only on how much time has passed
-
Participants who study in a room and are tested in the same room recall more than those tested in a different room. Which explanation best fits this result?
- Retrieval failure, because matching cues in the same room improve access to memories
- Retroactive interference, because the second room adds new information
- Decay, because the memories fade more quickly in a new room
- Proactive interference, because the first room blocks recall in the second room
-
A participant learns list A and then list B. Which result would show that proactive interference is stronger than retroactive interference?
- Learning list A first has no effect on the recall of list B
- Learning list A first reduces recall of list B more than learning list B first reduces recall of list A
- Learning list B first reduces recall of list A more than learning list A first reduces recall of list B
- Both orders produce identical recall in every case
-
A person can recall a memory only when a particular smell is present. Which explanation is best supported?
- Interference, because another memory blocks access to the target memory, which is why the smell has no effect on recall
- Retrieval failure, because the memory is stored but recall depends on a cue being present
- Decay, because the memory has faded completely from storage after a long delay, and the cue no longer makes any difference
- Sensory overload, because the smell overwhelmed the memory store, so the target memory was lost before it could be stored
-
Which situation best illustrates the value of cued recall over free recall?
- A student recalls more when given category names as prompts than when asked to list words freely
- A student recalls less when given category prompts than when asked to list words freely
- A student recalls more when a list is presented with no categories
- A student recalls the same amount with or without prompts because cues have no effect
-
Which of the following is NOT a cause of interference?
- The sensory register decaying within a fraction of a second
- Competing items that share the same retrieval route
- Old learning that is similar to new material
- New learning that is similar to old material
-
A person forgets their new phone number and keeps dialling the old one. Which type of interference best explains this?
- Decay, because the new number has faded from memory
- Retrieval failure, because the cues for the new number are missing
- Retroactive interference, because the new number interferes with recall of the old one
- Proactive interference, because the old number interferes with recall of the new one
Related quizzes
- Types of conformity: internalisation and compliance Quiz · 4.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Explanations for conformity and Asch's variables Quiz · 4.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Explanations for obedience: agentic state and legitimacy of authority Quiz · 4.1.1.3 · 20 questions
- Situational variables in obedience: Milgram's proximity, location and uniform Quiz · 4.1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Authoritarian Personality Quiz · 4.1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Resisting social influence and minority influence Quiz · 4.1.1.6 · 20 questions
- Multi-store model of memory Quiz · 4.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Working memory model Quiz · 4.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Eyewitness testimony and the cognitive interview Quiz · 4.1.2.4 · 20 questions
- Animal studies of attachment: Lorenz and Harlow Quiz · 4.1.3.1 · 20 questions