Lesson 4.1.5.9
4.1.5.9 Contestable and non-contestable markets Quiz: AQA Economics, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 4.1.5.9, Contestable and non-contestable markets: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Economics (7136), Unit 1: Individuals, firms, markets and market failure, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
A contestable market is one where:
- Entry is blocked by high sunk costs and patents
- Entry and exit are easy, so firms face the threat of competition even if few firms operate
- Only one firm can ever supply the market
- Firms control prices without any threat from rivals
-
Sunk costs are:
- Costs that fall as output rises
- Fixed costs that can be sold at full value on exit
- Payments to suppliers made after a contract ends, which the firm must settle in full even when it no longer trades in the market
- Costs that cannot be recovered if a firm leaves the market
-
Hit-and-run competition involves:
- Firms competing only through advertising campaigns
- Entering a market to take advantage of high profits and leaving quickly if prices fall
- Firms merging to avoid competition in the long run
- Firms raising prices and staying in the market permanently
-
Which market is most likely to be contestable?
- A market requiring large investments in fixed plant that cannot be resold
- A market with low sunk costs, where firms can enter and leave quickly
- A market protected by patents for twenty years
- A market dominated by one firm holding exclusive government licences
-
Why does contestability matter for market performance?
- It removes the need for any firm to consider rivals
- It means only perfectly competitive markets can be efficient
- It guarantees abnormal profits for incumbents in every market
- The threat of entry can discipline incumbents, keeping prices competitive even with few firms
-
A firm has sunk costs of £2 million and its assets have no resale value. If it exits the market, its loss is:
- 1 million, half the sunk costs
- 0, since all costs can be recovered on exit
- £2 million, since sunk costs are not recovered on exit
- 2 million plus its annual profits
-
An airline route has few firms but low sunk costs, because planes can be leased and moved easily. Which best describes the route?
- Monopolistic, since each airline offers a different service
- Highly contestable, so incumbents may keep fares low to deter entry
- Perfectly competitive, since all airlines charge identical fares on every route
- Non-contestable, because the number of firms is small
-
Which factor most reduces contestability?
- Large numbers of small firms with identical costs, so that each firm is too small to affect the market and no firm can keep prices high
- High sunk costs and legal or technical barriers to entry
- Free entry and exit with easily resold assets
- Low set-up costs that let any firm enter the market cheaply, so that incumbents face many new rivals in each year of trading
-
Why might a monopolist in a contestable market keep its price below the profit-maximising level?
- It has no costs, so it charges as low as possible
- Contestability forces the monopolist to match marginal cost exactly
- The threat of hit-and-run entry constrains its price, so it sets lower prices to deter entrants
- It is constrained by the rule that contestable markets require zero-profit pricing
-
Which statement best evaluates the claim that contestability alone is enough to ensure efficient outcomes?
- Contestability guarantees efficiency in every market
- Contestability helps, but sunk costs and information gaps in real markets can still limit entry, so efficiency is not guaranteed
- Contestability only matters for firms in perfect competition
- Contestability is irrelevant once a firm has a large market share
-
Non-contestable markets are typically characterised by:
- High sunk costs, which deter entry and leave incumbents with market power
- Zero fixed costs for all firms in the market
- Free entry and exit with no barriers at all
- Low sunk costs and easy resale of assets, which allow firms to enter and leave the market without losing much when conditions change
-
A firm invests in a specialised factory with no resale value. Why does this reduce contestability?
- The investment makes the market perfectly competitive
- The investment is sunk, so a potential entrant risks losing it if the market turns against them
- Specialised factories are always bought by rivals at full price
- The investment reduces fixed costs and attracts new firms
-
Which of the following is the best example of a sunk cost?
- A lease on delivery vans that can be returned without penalty
- Electricity bills paid only for the energy actually used
- The rent on a warehouse that can be sublet at full value
- Spending £500,000 on an advertising campaign that cannot be recovered
-
Hit-and-run competition is most likely when:
- Patent protection blocks any new entrant for decades
- The incumbent can cut prices immediately and at no cost
- Entry costs are high and sunk investment is large
- Entry costs are low and the incumbent cannot respond quickly to a new entrant
-
A monopolist expects that a new entrant with low sunk costs could leave quickly. This is an example of:
- Predatory pricing against the entrant
- Potential competition constraining the monopolist's behaviour
- Price discrimination by the monopolist
- Actual competition from an existing rival in the market
-
Contestability is best described as a property of:
- The government's regulatory body
- The personal skills of the firm's managers
- The market, relating to the ease of entry and exit
- An individual firm's marketing strategy
-
Why might a contestable market still have a small number of firms?
- Contestable markets are always perfectly competitive in every respect, so the firms in such markets have identical costs
- Contestable markets always have many small firms by law
- Scale economies may keep the number of firms small, while the threat of entry keeps them competitive
- Concentration is impossible when entry is free
-
Which action by an incumbent is most likely to deter entry in a contestable market?
- Keeping prices close to average cost so that entry is not attractive
- Reducing product quality to cut costs
- Stopping all investment in capacity
- Raising prices sharply to attract entrants
-
Which is an example of a barrier that makes a market non-contestable?
- Low set-up costs for new service providers
- Exclusive access to a key resource, such as an essential mineral deposit
- Free public information on costs and prices
- Freedom to resell all capital equipment at full value
-
Explain why sunk costs matter for hit-and-run competition.
- Low sunk costs let entrants leave without large losses, so they are willing to enter when profits are high
- Sunk costs mean entrants can always recover their investment on exit, so hit-and-run entry carries no risk of loss at any time
- High sunk costs make entry easier because entrants share the risk of their investment with the other firms that have also committed
- Sunk costs are irrelevant because firms never leave a market once they have entered
Related quizzes
- Economic methodology Quiz · 4.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- The nature and purpose of economic activity Quiz · 4.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Economic resources Quiz · 4.1.1.3 · 20 questions
- Scarcity, choice and the allocation of resources Quiz · 4.1.1.4 · 20 questions
- Production possibility diagrams Quiz · 4.1.1.5 · 20 questions
- Consumer behaviour Quiz · 4.1.2.1 · 20 questions
- Imperfect information Quiz · 4.1.2.2 · 20 questions
- Aspects of behavioural economic theory Quiz · 4.1.2.3 · 20 questions
- Behavioural economics and economic policy Quiz · 4.1.2.4 · 20 questions
- The determinants of the demand for goods and services Quiz · 4.1.3.1 · 20 questions