Lesson 4.1.5.9

4.1.5.9 Contestable and non-contestable markets Quiz: AQA Economics, Unit 1

20 questions

In partnership with Revision Ninja

Lesson 4.1.5.9, Contestable and non-contestable markets: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Economics (7136), Unit 1: Individuals, firms, markets and market failure, written with Revision Ninja.

Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.

Host this setFree Play

The 20 questions

  1. A contestable market is one where:

    • Entry is blocked by high sunk costs and patents
    • Entry and exit are easy, so firms face the threat of competition even if few firms operate
    • Only one firm can ever supply the market
    • Firms control prices without any threat from rivals
  2. Sunk costs are:

    • Costs that fall as output rises
    • Fixed costs that can be sold at full value on exit
    • Payments to suppliers made after a contract ends, which the firm must settle in full even when it no longer trades in the market
    • Costs that cannot be recovered if a firm leaves the market
  3. Hit-and-run competition involves:

    • Firms competing only through advertising campaigns
    • Entering a market to take advantage of high profits and leaving quickly if prices fall
    • Firms merging to avoid competition in the long run
    • Firms raising prices and staying in the market permanently
  4. Which market is most likely to be contestable?

    • A market requiring large investments in fixed plant that cannot be resold
    • A market with low sunk costs, where firms can enter and leave quickly
    • A market protected by patents for twenty years
    • A market dominated by one firm holding exclusive government licences
  5. Why does contestability matter for market performance?

    • It removes the need for any firm to consider rivals
    • It means only perfectly competitive markets can be efficient
    • It guarantees abnormal profits for incumbents in every market
    • The threat of entry can discipline incumbents, keeping prices competitive even with few firms
  6. A firm has sunk costs of £2 million and its assets have no resale value. If it exits the market, its loss is:

    • 1 million, half the sunk costs
    • 0, since all costs can be recovered on exit
    • £2 million, since sunk costs are not recovered on exit
    • 2 million plus its annual profits
  7. An airline route has few firms but low sunk costs, because planes can be leased and moved easily. Which best describes the route?

    • Monopolistic, since each airline offers a different service
    • Highly contestable, so incumbents may keep fares low to deter entry
    • Perfectly competitive, since all airlines charge identical fares on every route
    • Non-contestable, because the number of firms is small
  8. Which factor most reduces contestability?

    • Large numbers of small firms with identical costs, so that each firm is too small to affect the market and no firm can keep prices high
    • High sunk costs and legal or technical barriers to entry
    • Free entry and exit with easily resold assets
    • Low set-up costs that let any firm enter the market cheaply, so that incumbents face many new rivals in each year of trading
  9. Why might a monopolist in a contestable market keep its price below the profit-maximising level?

    • It has no costs, so it charges as low as possible
    • Contestability forces the monopolist to match marginal cost exactly
    • The threat of hit-and-run entry constrains its price, so it sets lower prices to deter entrants
    • It is constrained by the rule that contestable markets require zero-profit pricing
  10. Which statement best evaluates the claim that contestability alone is enough to ensure efficient outcomes?

    • Contestability guarantees efficiency in every market
    • Contestability helps, but sunk costs and information gaps in real markets can still limit entry, so efficiency is not guaranteed
    • Contestability only matters for firms in perfect competition
    • Contestability is irrelevant once a firm has a large market share
  11. Non-contestable markets are typically characterised by:

    • High sunk costs, which deter entry and leave incumbents with market power
    • Zero fixed costs for all firms in the market
    • Free entry and exit with no barriers at all
    • Low sunk costs and easy resale of assets, which allow firms to enter and leave the market without losing much when conditions change
  12. A firm invests in a specialised factory with no resale value. Why does this reduce contestability?

    • The investment makes the market perfectly competitive
    • The investment is sunk, so a potential entrant risks losing it if the market turns against them
    • Specialised factories are always bought by rivals at full price
    • The investment reduces fixed costs and attracts new firms
  13. Which of the following is the best example of a sunk cost?

    • A lease on delivery vans that can be returned without penalty
    • Electricity bills paid only for the energy actually used
    • The rent on a warehouse that can be sublet at full value
    • Spending £500,000 on an advertising campaign that cannot be recovered
  14. Hit-and-run competition is most likely when:

    • Patent protection blocks any new entrant for decades
    • The incumbent can cut prices immediately and at no cost
    • Entry costs are high and sunk investment is large
    • Entry costs are low and the incumbent cannot respond quickly to a new entrant
  15. A monopolist expects that a new entrant with low sunk costs could leave quickly. This is an example of:

    • Predatory pricing against the entrant
    • Potential competition constraining the monopolist's behaviour
    • Price discrimination by the monopolist
    • Actual competition from an existing rival in the market
  16. Contestability is best described as a property of:

    • The government's regulatory body
    • The personal skills of the firm's managers
    • The market, relating to the ease of entry and exit
    • An individual firm's marketing strategy
  17. Why might a contestable market still have a small number of firms?

    • Contestable markets are always perfectly competitive in every respect, so the firms in such markets have identical costs
    • Contestable markets always have many small firms by law
    • Scale economies may keep the number of firms small, while the threat of entry keeps them competitive
    • Concentration is impossible when entry is free
  18. Which action by an incumbent is most likely to deter entry in a contestable market?

    • Keeping prices close to average cost so that entry is not attractive
    • Reducing product quality to cut costs
    • Stopping all investment in capacity
    • Raising prices sharply to attract entrants
  19. Which is an example of a barrier that makes a market non-contestable?

    • Low set-up costs for new service providers
    • Exclusive access to a key resource, such as an essential mineral deposit
    • Free public information on costs and prices
    • Freedom to resell all capital equipment at full value
  20. Explain why sunk costs matter for hit-and-run competition.

    • Low sunk costs let entrants leave without large losses, so they are willing to enter when profits are high
    • Sunk costs mean entrants can always recover their investment on exit, so hit-and-run entry carries no risk of loss at any time
    • High sunk costs make entry easier because entrants share the risk of their investment with the other firms that have also committed
    • Sunk costs are irrelevant because firms never leave a market once they have entered

All AQA Economics quizzes