Lesson 3.7.3
3.7.3 Analysing internal position: overall performance Quiz: AQA Business, Unit 7
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.7.3, Analysing internal position: overall performance: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Business (7132), Unit 7: Analysing the strategic position of a business, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What are the three elements of Elkington's triple bottom line?
- Strategy, structure and systems, which measure how well a business is organised and managed overall
- Price, promotion and place, which measure how a business sells its goods and services to customers
- Sales, wages and output, which measure the cost and volume of a business's day-to-day operations
- Profit, people and planet, which measure financial, social and environmental performance together
-
Which of the following is an example of non-financial data used to assess a business's overall performance?
- The income statement figure for the cost of sales in the last period
- Customer satisfaction scores collected from a regular survey of buyers
- The amount of interest paid to banks in the most recent financial year
- The balance sheet total for assets held by the business at the year end
-
What is meant by a core competence?
- A unique capability that gives a business a competitive advantage and is hard for rivals to copy
- A qualification that an employee gains by completing a formal training course organised by the firm
- A legal requirement that a business must meet before it can trade lawfully in its market sector
- A financial target that a business sets for the next financial year to measure profit growth
-
Which measure would best assess short-term performance rather than long-term performance?
- Market share growth measured over a period of several years in the market
- Investment in research and development that will pay back over a decade
- Monthly operating profit compared with the budget set for the same month
- Brand value built up gradually through consistent customer service over many years
-
Which of these is a long-term measure of business performance?
- The number of invoices issued this week
- Growth in market share over five years
- Cash balance at the end of the current month
- Overtime hours worked in the last fortnight
-
A firm has 400 staff on average and 40 leavers in a year. What is the staff turnover rate?
- 4%
- 10%
- 0.1%
- 40%
-
A firm had 1,200 customers at the start of the year and retained 900 of them. What is the customer retention rate?
- 900%
- 133%
- 25%
- 75%
-
Sales rise by 10% while the total market grows by 20%. What happens to the firm's market share?
- It rises by 20%, because a growing market always raises the share of every firm in it
- It rises by 10%, because the firm's sales growth is the same as its market share growth
- It falls by about 8.3%, because 1.10 divided by 1.20 is about 0.917
- It stays the same, because share is measured in pounds rather than in units sold
-
Which of the following best explains the 'planet' element of the triple bottom line?
- The number of employees who receive training in computer skills every year
- The share of profit paid to shareholders as dividends at the annual general meeting
- The environmental impact of a business, such as emissions, waste and resource use
- The average salary paid to managers within the firm across all departments
-
A business has strong core competences in brand and product design. Which evaluation is most accurate?
- These strengths are valuable only if they are maintained and kept hard for rivals to copy over time
- These strengths guarantee market leadership in every product category the business chooses to enter
- These strengths make financial analysis unnecessary because customers will always pay higher prices
- These strengths can be bought and sold easily by any firm that wants to compete in the market
-
Why is it useful to benchmark a firm's performance against competitors?
- It removes the need to analyse the firm's own trends over time, because rivals' data is more reliable
- It replaces the need for a strategy because the firm can simply copy the methods of its competitors
- It guarantees that a firm will outperform its rivals in the coming year because competitors' results are known
- It shows whether results are good or poor in relative terms, which a single figure cannot show on its own
-
A firm's operating profit is stable, but its customer complaints have doubled and repeat purchases have fallen. What is the best evaluation?
- The business is clearly performing well, so the complaints and repeat purchase figures can be safely ignored
- Repeat purchases are irrelevant to a business that earns a stable operating profit in the current year
- Customer complaints have no effect on profits, so managers should focus only on the financial statements
- Financial results alone may hide weakening customer performance, which could damage future profits if it continues
-
A firm has 250 staff, absenteeism of 4% and an average of 220 working days a year. How many staff-days are lost?
- 2,200 days
- 8,800 days
- 220 days
- 55 days
-
Why can the same profit figure lead to different conclusions about a business?
- Profit is only relevant to shareholders, so it has no effect on how other stakeholders judge the business
- Profit figures are always identical in meaning, so there is no need for any further comparison
- Its meaning depends on trends over time and on how it compares with competitors and the market
- Profit is calculated differently by every business in the same market, so it cannot be compared at all
-
Evaluate the claim that a triple bottom line approach always improves a business's performance.
- It always raises profit immediately because customers reward every social and environmental measure with higher spending
- It has no value to businesses because only profit can be measured reliably in a set of accounts
- It removes the need for financial planning because social and environmental goals replace profit targets entirely
- It can improve reputation and resilience, but social and environmental spending may cut short-term profit, so trade-offs exist
-
A business is comparing its performance using only its financial statements. What is the main limitation of this approach?
- Financial statements are always inaccurate, so no conclusion from them can ever be trusted by managers
- Financial statements are only produced for shareholders, so they do not show anything about the business
- It is impossible to calculate profit from the income statement, so the approach cannot be used at all
- It ignores customer, staff and environmental data that can show performance drivers and future risks
-
Which type of data is most relevant to assessing operational efficiency?
- Measures such as production capacity utilisation and defect rates in the production process
- The brand awareness scores from a survey of customers in a different market sector entirely
- The number of shares that the business has issued to outside investors in the most recent year
- The total salary paid to the chief executive and board members at the annual general meeting
-
Which of these is a people measure within the triple bottom line?
- Carbon emissions from the firm's delivery vehicles over the same period of the year
- The gearing ratio calculated from the balance sheet at the end of the year
- Staff engagement scores and the amount invested in training over the financial year
- Dividend paid to shareholders each year, expressed as a share of profit after tax
-
Why might a business track both short-term and long-term performance measures?
- Short-term measures show current health, while long-term measures show whether growth and competitiveness can be sustained
- Short-term measures are always more accurate than long-term measures, so long-term ones can safely be dropped
- Short-term measures cannot be calculated from financial statements, so they should be replaced by other figures
- Long-term measures are only required by law, so they are of no practical use to managers making decisions
-
A firm has a ROCE of 20% but its market share is falling each year. What is the best evaluation?
- The firm is clearly successful because a 20% ROCE means that market share can safely be ignored by managers
- The falling share must be caused by a fall in the value of the firm's assets on the balance sheet at year end
- Current profitability is strong, but declining competitiveness may erode future returns, so both measures should be considered together
- Market share is irrelevant to performance because only financial ratios can show how a business is doing overall
Related quizzes
- Mission, corporate objectives and functional objectives Quiz · 3.7.1.1 · 20 questions
- Strategy, tactics and SWOT analysis Quiz · 3.7.1.2 · 20 questions
- Analysing internal position: financial ratio analysis Quiz · 3.7.2 · 20 questions
- Analysing external environment: political and legal change Quiz · 3.7.4 · 20 questions
- Analysing external environment: economic change Quiz · 3.7.5 · 20 questions
- Analysing external environment: social and technological change Quiz · 3.7.6 · 20 questions
- Analysing external environment: the competitive environment Quiz · 3.7.7 · 20 questions
- Analysing strategic options: investment appraisal Quiz · 3.7.8 · 20 questions
- Understanding the nature and purpose of business Quiz · 3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Causes, types and value of change Quiz · 3.10.1.1 · 20 questions