Lesson 3.2.5.7
3.2.5.7 Resource security: case studies Quiz: AQA Geography, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.5.7, Resource security: case studies: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Geography (7037), Unit 2: Human geography, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
A resource case study should analyse which connection to human welfare?
- The average height of mountains in the region
- The number of ships that visit the region each year
- The number of statues in the resource-producing city
- The relationship between resource security and the well-being of the people who depend on it
-
Which attempt to manage a water resource is most commonly used in arid regions?
- Increasing water-intensive crops without any controls
- Discharging untreated effluent to rivers
- Storage and transfers combined with demand management
- Unrestricted abstraction from groundwater without monitoring
-
A case study of an energy resource explains how a national government manages supply. Which element is most relevant?
- Policies that balance supply expansion with demand reduction and environmental protection
- Policies that remove all energy infrastructure
- Policies that rely solely on imports with no domestic planning
- Policies that ignore demand and environmental effects
-
Which feature best describes a case study of how a physical environment affects the availability and cost of a resource?
- Showing how the resource is used only for tourism
- Showing how the resource has no physical basis
- Showing how the resource is distributed only by political decisions
- Showing how geology, climate or drainage determines where a resource is found and how costly it is to extract or deliver
-
Which strategy most directly reduces the environmental impact of an energy resource development in a fragile area?
- Abandoning monitoring once extraction begins
- Ignoring rehabilitation to keep costs low
- Siting infrastructure in the most sensitive habitats
- Carefully sited infrastructure and environmental monitoring alongside rehabilitation
-
Which argument best evaluates the relationship between resource security and conflict?
- Competition over shared or scarce resources can create conflict, but cooperation and governance can reduce it
- Conflict over resources is impossible between neighbours
- Resource security always causes war in every case
- Resource security has no relationship with conflict
-
A water-scarce city depends on a river that flows through another country. Which issue is most central to its water security?
- The number of sports stadiums in the city, counted each season and compared with the number of hotels and cinemas across the region
- Negotiation over water sharing and the reliability of flows across the border
- The average temperature of the city's office buildings, recorded each winter and compared with the temperature of offices in other cities
- The population of rural villages far from the river, counted in each census and compared with the number of farms they support each year
-
Which measure would best show whether attempts to manage a resource have improved human welfare?
- The number of tourist photographs taken of the region each year, counted from social media and compared with visitor numbers in towns
- Trends in access to resources and related welfare indicators such as health and income
- The number of resource company logos displayed in each city centre, counted each year and compared with the advertising of rivals
- The colour of maps of the region, judged by the cartographers who drew each edition and compared with the colours used in earlier maps
-
A case study of a region with mineral extraction finds rising income but also worsening air quality. Which conclusion is most balanced?
- Mineral extraction has no environmental effects, because mines are sealed and never release dust, water or gases into the surrounding land
- Mineral extraction has no economic value in any region, since every mine operates at a loss and never contributes income to local people
- Mineral extraction should be ignored in all analyses, since its effects are too small to matter for either the economy or the environment
- Mineral extraction brings economic gains alongside environmental costs that need management
-
Which attempt to manage a resource is most closely linked to reducing demand rather than increasing supply?
- Expanding water transfers from distant basins, which brings new supplies by pipeline and reduces the pressure on local rivers and wells
- Water pricing and metering to encourage efficient use
- Constructing desalination plants to increase supply, which adds new fresh water from the sea and reduces reliance on rivers and aquifers
- Building new reservoirs to store additional water, which raises the volume available for supply and gives planners a larger buffer
-
Which argument best supports the view that resource case studies should include local experience as well as national data?
- Local experience is irrelevant to resource management, because planners rely only on engineering data and never on residents' views
- Only the views of government officials should be considered, since officials alone hold the knowledge needed to judge any resource case
- Local experience reveals how people are affected by shortages or pollution, which national averages can hide
- National averages always reveal everything about local experience, since the average is equally true of every district
-
A water transfer scheme supplies a city but leaves a downstream farming community with reduced water. What is the most appropriate evaluation?
- The scheme is entirely beneficial with no costs to anyone, since every community gains equally and no one loses any water at all
- The scheme improves the city's security but may harm the downstream community, so compensation or safeguards may be needed
- The scheme has no effect on the downstream community, because the transfer leaves river flows unchanged below the intake
- The scheme should be ignored because it is only a local matter, since water transfers within a single region never affect anyone else
-
Which combination best describes what a resource case study should evaluate?
- Only the history of the resource's discovery, with dates of each find recorded and listed in order without any analysis of its use
- Only the price of the resource on one day, recorded at the market close and compared with the prices of other goods in the same week
- Only the colours used in promotional material, which are compared across firms to show how each company presents its resource to buyers
- Physical availability, human use, management attempts and implications for security and welfare
-
A mineral-rich region has been developed rapidly, but local incomes have not risen. Which explanation is most relevant to a case study?
- The lack of income growth is unrelated to resource development, since local wages are set by national policy and never by any mine
- Benefits may be captured by external companies or elites rather than reaching local communities
- Benefits always reach every local household immediately, since revenue from the mine is shared among residents within weeks of each sale
- Mineral extraction cannot create any benefits for anyone, because the costs of mining always outweigh every gain for the local economy
-
Which strategy is most likely to strengthen the sustainability of a water supply scheme in a case study region?
- Ignoring leakage and community views in planning, which saves time in the design stage and keeps the scheme focused on engineering alone
- Relying on a single source with no backup, since one reservoir is simpler to manage and cheaper to run than a network of several supplies
- Combining supply investment with conservation, leakage reduction and community engagement
- Expanding supply only, with no demand management, so that every new source is simply added to a system that wastes water at high rates
-
Which argument best evaluates the human welfare impact of an energy shortage in a case study?
- Shortages only affect wealthy households with spare energy, because poorer families have no need for heating or cooking in their homes
- Shortages have no effect on people's welfare in any setting, since households always adjust their use without any loss of heating or food
- Shortages improve welfare by reducing consumption, since less energy use means lower bills and healthier, more active lives for residents
- Shortages can reduce heating, food security and productivity, with the greatest effects on poorer households
-
Which term describes a situation where a country relies heavily on a single external supplier for a critical resource?
- Demographic dividend
- Carrying capacity
- Supply dependence
- Resource frontier
-
A city receives 40% of its water from a transboundary river that supplies 60 million cubic metres a year to the city's catchment. What volume does the city receive from the river?
- 36 million cubic metres
- 60 million cubic metres
- 15 million cubic metres
- 24 million cubic metres
-
A mineral project employs 300 workers, and 45% of them are local residents. How many local residents are employed?
- 450
- 255
- 135
- 30
-
Which argument best evaluates the use of export taxes to manage a mineral resource?
- They have no effect on revenue or investment, because the tax is set so low that it changes neither income nor company decisions
- They eliminate all trade in the mineral, since no exporter will ever sell abroad once a tax of any size is placed on each shipment
- They can raise revenue but may encourage smuggling or reduce investment if poorly designed
- They always improve local welfare without any side effects, since revenue from the tax is spent directly on services in every community
Related quizzes
- Globalisation Quiz · 3.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Global systems Quiz · 3.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- International trade and access to markets Quiz · 3.2.1.3 · 20 questions
- Global governance Quiz · 3.2.1.4 · 20 questions
- The 'global commons' and Antarctica as a global common Quiz · 3.2.1.5 · 20 questions
- Globalisation critique Quiz · 3.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Global systems: quantitative and qualitative skills Quiz · 3.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- The nature and importance of places Quiz · 3.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Relationships, connections, meaning and representation Quiz · 3.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Changing places: quantitative and qualitative skills Quiz · 3.2.2.3 · 20 questions