Lesson 3.2.3.9
3.2.3.9 Urban environments: case studies Quiz: AQA Geography, Unit 2
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.3.9, Urban environments: case studies: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA Geography (7037), Unit 2: Human geography, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
A case study of two contrasting urban areas is most useful for analysing which aspect of urban change?
- Historical battles fought within each city boundary
- Only the architectural style of landmark buildings
- Patterns of economic and social well-being alongside physical environmental conditions
- The number of tourists visiting each city in one year
-
When comparing two contrasting urban case studies, which factor should be considered in relation to environmental sustainability?
- The number of football stadiums in each city
- The distance of each city from the nearest international airport only
- Only the colour of the buildings in the central district
- The implications of the environmental conditions and processes for sustainability in each area
-
Which combination best describes what a strong urban case study should include?
- A list of local festivals with no environmental data
- Maps of underground railways and nothing else
- Only economic data from the national government
- Patterns of well-being, physical environmental conditions, and the experiences and attitudes of residents
-
Which measure would best show patterns of economic well-being in an urban case study area?
- Median household income and rates of unemployment compared across neighbourhoods
- The average annual rainfall for the nearest rural station
- The number of bus stops in the city centre
- The number of museums per square kilometre
-
A case study finds that a city's poorest districts have the highest air pollution. What type of analysis does this represent?
- Linking environmental conditions to social patterns of well-being
- Measuring the carbon cycle in a forest
- Analysing river discharge only
- Mapping coastal erosion rates
-
In an urban case study, which technique would most effectively show how land values and housing quality vary across a city?
- Counting the number of trees in the nearest national park
- Choropleth mapping of census or survey data by district
- Calculating the average depth of the city's sewers only
- Analysing a single photograph of the city centre
-
Which feature of an urban case study would best address the experience and attitudes of its population?
- Satellite imagery of the city's road network, which shows the layout of streets and junctions but records nothing about people's views
- Monthly rainfall totals for the city, recorded at a single gauge in the centre, which describes weather but nothing about residents
- Questionnaire or interview data from residents about their views on local conditions
- Records of building heights only, counted from planning files, which describe the structures but not how people feel about them
-
Two contrasting urban areas are compared. One has high economic inequality and the other has high levels of investment. What is the best basis for comparison?
- The colour schemes of public signage in each area, photographed and compared to show how each district presents itself to visitors
- Measures of income distribution, investment and housing quality for both areas
- The average height of trees in the central parks of each area, measured with clinometers and compared across the two districts
- The total number of historic monuments in each area, counted from heritage registers to show how old the built environment is
-
Which argument best explains why a case study should consider both physical and human factors in an urban area?
- Physical conditions such as topography and climate interact with human decisions to shape urban outcomes
- Physical and human factors operate completely independently of each other, so each can be studied in isolation from the other
- Only human factors determine urban outcomes, so physical data are irrelevant, because policy and investment decide every urban result
- Only physical factors determine urban outcomes, so human data are unnecessary, since topography and climate set every result in cities
-
In an urban case study, a researcher finds that a river is heavily polluted downstream of an industrial estate. Which conclusion is best supported by this evidence?
- Pollution in the river is caused only by rainfall, since storm water is the sole source of contamination in any urban river system
- Industrial discharge is likely affecting water quality and may create environmental and health risks for residents
- The river is naturally very clean and unaffected by the estate, so the pollution must have arrived from upstream sources instead
- Industrial estates have no effect on river water quality, because factories are required by law to discharge only clean water into rivers
-
Which combination of data would best support an evaluation of urban sustainability in a case study?
- The number of football clubs in the city, counted from league tables and compared with the number of clubs in other cities
- The age of the city's oldest bridge, measured from engineering records and compared with the age of each of its newer crossings
- Energy use, transport patterns, air quality and housing density for the area
- The number of local festivals and parades held each year, counted from event listings and compared with attendance at each event
-
A case study of a city concludes that its sustainability strategies have improved liveability but worsened equity. What type of evaluation does this represent?
- A complete rejection of any change in urban policy, since every intervention is judged to have failed regardless of its measured outcomes
- A one-sided assessment that ignores social outcomes, focusing only on environmental gains and treating economic costs as irrelevant
- A purely descriptive list of city landmarks, with each building and street named in order and no evaluation of any policy effects
- A balanced evaluation recognising trade-offs between dimensions of sustainability
-
Which step is most important when designing an urban case study comparison?
- Choosing cities with the same name regardless of location, so that the comparison draws on whichever places share the same label
- Choosing areas that contrast on the key themes, such as economic development or population density
- Choosing areas with no data available at all, so that the analysis depends entirely on the researcher's impressions of each place
- Choosing two cities that are identical in every respect, so that any differences found in the study can be attributed to a single factor
-
A city's population density is 6,000 people per square kilometre in one area and 1,500 per square kilometre in another. How many times greater is the density of the first area?
- 7.5 times
- 4 times
- 6 times
- 1.5 times
-
Which factor is most important in analysing how the experience of residents varies in an urban case study?
- The total length of the city's rivers, measured from maps and compared with the length of each street that runs alongside them
- The number of trees planted in each district in a single year, counted from the council's planting records for that twelve-month period
- Differences in income, age, tenure and location within the city
- The number of traffic lights per square kilometre alone, counted at every junction and compared with the number of bus stops nearby
-
A fieldwork-based urban study records litter, noise and street condition at sites across a city. What is the main purpose of this type of data?
- To identify the oldest buildings in each district, recording construction dates from maps and comparing them across neighbourhoods
- To determine the value of the city's currency against other currencies, using exchange rates recorded at the same time each day
- To measure environmental quality and its variation between neighbourhoods
- To count the number of residents in each house, recorded door by door and compared with the number of rooms in each dwelling
-
Which argument best evaluates the strength of a single urban case study for general conclusions?
- It always provides conclusions that apply to all cities in the world, because each place reflects the same pattern of urban change
- It is useless because it is based on a single place, so no evidence from one city can ever inform understanding of any other
- It provides detailed evidence for that place but its findings may not apply to other cities without caution
- It only works if the study is carried out by a national government, since local researchers lack the authority to collect urban data
-
In an urban case study, which pattern would indicate that environmental quality and social deprivation are closely linked?
- Areas with high deprivation consistently showing poorer air and noise environments
- No consistent relationship between deprivation and environmental quality, since poor and wealthy districts show similar noise levels
- Deprived areas having more parks per resident than wealthy areas, which means poorer districts enjoy more green space for each person
- Areas with high deprivation showing the cleanest air and quietest streets, because wealthier districts host busier roads and factories
-
A case study finds that sustainable drainage schemes were introduced only in wealthy districts. Which evaluation is most justified?
- The schemes have reduced poverty across all districts, because better drainage raises property values and lifts incomes in every area
- The schemes have no relevance to social inequality, since drainage works affect every district in the same way regardless of income
- The schemes may widen inequality in environmental quality between districts
- The schemes have improved flood protection equally across the whole city, so every district benefits from the same level of protection
-
Which combination best describes the purpose of an urban case study in the specification?
- To predict the population of each city in the year 3000, using current growth rates to project numbers far into the distant future
- To illustrate and analyse key urban themes using real evidence from contrasting areas
- To list the architectural history of a single building, tracing each design change from its construction to its present condition
- To memorise the names of all major cities in the world, using maps and lists to recall each city's location and population size
Related quizzes
- Globalisation Quiz · 3.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Global systems Quiz · 3.2.1.2 · 20 questions
- International trade and access to markets Quiz · 3.2.1.3 · 20 questions
- Global governance Quiz · 3.2.1.4 · 20 questions
- The 'global commons' and Antarctica as a global common Quiz · 3.2.1.5 · 20 questions
- Globalisation critique Quiz · 3.2.1.6 · 20 questions
- Global systems: quantitative and qualitative skills Quiz · 3.2.1.7 · 20 questions
- The nature and importance of places Quiz · 3.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Relationships, connections, meaning and representation Quiz · 3.2.2.2 · 20 questions
- Changing places: quantitative and qualitative skills Quiz · 3.2.2.3 · 20 questions