Lesson 6.6.1
6.6.1 Issues and debates in criminological psychology Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 6
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 6.6.1, Issues and debates in criminological psychology: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 6: Criminological psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which ethical issue in criminological psychology concerns field experiments on eyewitness testing?
- The colour of the field experiment's report
- Possible lack of debriefing after a field experiment that tests eyewitness unreliability
- The number of hours in the day
- The time of year the experiment began
-
Which practical problem in criminological research is named in the specification?
- Having to pay participants in coins
- Having to choose a font for the report
- Having to use mock juries and artificial situations because real trials cannot be manipulated
- Having too many participants to store on a computer
-
Which issue is raised by biological explanations of criminal behaviour in the reductionism debate?
- They are impossible to test with any method
- They rule out any influence of the environment
- They may reduce complex criminal behaviour to a single biological cause
- They always explain every case of crime fully
-
Which debate is illustrated by the comparison of different explanations of criminal behaviour?
- Gender differences in dress codes in courts
- Comparisons between ways of explaining behaviour using different themes, such as biology and learning theory
- The number of pages in the criminal code
- Differences between two court buildings
-
Which debate concerns whether criminological psychology is a science?
- Whether all courtrooms should have the same layout
- Whether lawyers should use a specific font
- Whether judges should wear robes in every case
- Psychology as a science, for example through using experiments and biological explanations
-
Which issue is raised by the nature-nurture debate in criminological psychology?
- Whether crime is always caused by weather
- Whether courts should use computers
- Whether crimes happen mainly at night
- Whether crime has biological or social and learning causes
-
Why are mock juries used in criminological research?
- Because mock juries are always more accurate than real ones
- Because real trials cannot be manipulated for research purposes
- Because mock juries never need consent
- Because mock jurors are cheaper to pay in every case
-
Which ethical concern arises from research on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony with real people?
- Possible harm if witnesses are misled about events and not debriefed
- That participants will become too good at identifying faces
- That the study will take too little time
- That the researcher will need too many pens
-
Which issue of culture and gender may affect jury decision-making?
- Cultural or gender differences that have no link to jurors
- Cultural or gender differences only in animal research
- Cultural or gender differences that always help the defendant
- Cultural or gender differences that might lead to bias against a defendant
-
Which point about development in criminological psychology is an example of an issue that has changed over time?
- The unchanging number of courts in the country
- The constant price of stationery in courts
- The fixed colour of police uniforms
- The way psychological understanding of crime has developed, such as the changing study of eyewitness testimony
-
Which argument about social control in criminological psychology is most relevant?
- Policies are unrelated to the law in any country
- Policies for offenders can be a form of social control that enforces norms
- Policies only matter to the police and not to society
- Policies never affect the behaviour of offenders in any way
-
Which practical problem arises when research tries to test how a witness responds under stress in a real trial?
- Witnesses always enjoy being tested in trials
- Trials are always too short to include any witnesses
- Trials never involve any stress at all
- Ethical and practical limits prevent manipulating real trial conditions for research
-
Which evaluation of biological explanations of crime is most appropriate?
- They can be tested only by reading legal texts
- They offer useful insights but may overlook social and learning factors that also influence offending
- They are complete and need no other explanation
- They have no value for understanding crime
-
Which statement describes the ethical debate about labelling offenders?
- Labelling always reduces offending in everyone
- Labelling has no ethical implications at all
- Labelling may stigmatise people and encourage further offending, which raises ethical questions
- Labelling is only relevant to the design of courts
-
A researcher uses an artificial situation in a study of jurors. Which issue from the specification does this illustrate?
- Issues of architectural style in courtrooms
- Issues of traffic management near courts
- Practical issues in the design and implementation of research in criminological psychology
- Issues of religious belief in trials
-
Which statement about the 'Issues and debates' section is most accurate?
- It is only relevant to research on animals
- It asks students to memorise a list of court addresses
- It asks students to discuss the ethical, practical and theoretical debates across criminological research
- It asks students to design a new courtroom
-
Which balanced conclusion best fits a discussion of the reliability of criminal investigations?
- Unreliable evidence is a serious risk, so safeguards and ethical research should be prioritised
- Investigations are always unreliable and should stop
- Investigations are always reliable and need no research
- Investigations are unrelated to psychology
-
What is a practical issue in measuring jurors' decisions in simulated trials?
- Participants know the case is not real, which may change the decisions they make
- Mock trials cannot involve any written material
- Verdicts in mock trials are always unanimous
- Participants have too much experience of real trials
-
Why should a researcher be cautious when drawing conclusions from a meta-analysis of eyewitness research?
- Meta-analyses have no statistical basis at all
- Meta-analyses never include more than one study
- Meta-analyses combine studies of varying quality and design, so the pooled result depends on the included studies
- Meta-analyses always produce identical results whatever the studies
-
Which issue relates to whether eyewitness research counts as psychology as a science?
- Writing reports in a formal style
- Naming a courtroom after a famous judge
- Using controlled experiments to produce measurable findings about memory
- Choosing a title for a research paper
Related quizzes
- Biological and social explanations of crime Quiz · 6.1.1 · 20 questions
- Understanding offenders: cognitive and ethical interviews and formulation Quiz · 6.1.2 · 20 questions
- Treatments for offenders: CBT and biological treatment Quiz · 6.1.3 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting eyewitness testimony Quiz · 6.1.4 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting jury decision-making Quiz · 6.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in criminal behaviour Quiz · 6.1.6 · 20 questions
- Eyewitness research methods, sampling and ethics Quiz · 6.2.1 · 20 questions
- Data analysis, reliability and validity in criminological research Quiz · 6.2.2 · 20 questions
- Loftus and Palmer, Bradbury and Williams, Valentine and Mesout, and Howells studies Quiz · 6.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: eyewitness testimony and jury bias Quiz · 6.4.1 · 20 questions