Lesson 6.2.1
6.2.1 Eyewitness research methods, sampling and ethics Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 6
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 6.2.1, Eyewitness research methods, sampling and ethics: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 6: Criminological psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is a laboratory experiment in eyewitness research?
- A study of witnesses carried out only by observation in a courtroom, with no manipulation of any variable
- A case study of one witness followed for many years, with detailed notes kept on their memory
- A survey of attitudes towards the police, collected through questionnaires sent to households in an area
- A controlled study in which the researcher manipulates a variable and measures its effect in a controlled setting
-
What is a field experiment in eyewitness research?
- A study in which no variables are manipulated, and the researcher only records what naturally happens
- A study where the manipulation takes place in a natural or real-life setting
- A study that uses only written questionnaires sent to witnesses by post, with no change to any condition
- A study limited to interviews with lawyers about how they think witnesses behave in court
-
What is a main advantage of laboratory experiments for studying eyewitness testimony?
- High control over variables, which supports cause-and-effect conclusions
- Guaranteed generalisability to all witnesses everywhere
- Freedom from any need for consent
- High ecological validity because they reproduce every real crime
-
What is a main disadvantage of laboratory experiments for eyewitness research?
- They are never able to measure memory accuracy, so their results cannot be used to judge any witness
- They always involve dangerous physical stress, which means participants can be harmed in the study
- Artificial settings may lower ecological validity, so findings may not transfer to real crimes
- They cannot use any form of random allocation, so the groups are always unequal in size and make-up
-
What is a main advantage of field experiments in eyewitness research?
- A guarantee that participants will never be deceived
- Results that are always identical to laboratory findings
- Realistic conditions give high ecological validity
- Complete control over every variable in the setting
-
What is a main ethical issue in field experiments on eyewitness identification?
- Participants never experience any stress, so the study cannot tell whether stress matters at all
- Field experiments never involve other people, so they cannot tell us anything about social memory
- Participants are always paid excessively, which may make them less honest about their memories
- Participants may be deceived or distressed, so debriefing and harm minimisation are needed
-
What is a case study in eyewitness research?
- A review of all published studies on memory, pooled to estimate the overall size of an effect
- A randomised experiment with one control group, in which witnesses are allocated by chance
- A large survey of thousands of witnesses, collected from police records across several regions
- An in-depth investigation of one individual or a small number of cases
-
A researcher studies one witness's memory of a crime in great depth over several months. Which method is this?
- A cross-sectional survey
- A randomised controlled trial
- A case study
- A meta-analysis
-
What is the main limitation of a case study of one eyewitness?
- Case studies always contain numerical data only, so they cannot describe the witness's experience
- Case studies remove the need for any ethical approval, since they only involve one person at a time
- Case studies cannot describe any real person's memory, because they are based on imagined events
- Findings may not generalise to other witnesses, so the results are limited in scope
-
A researcher randomly assigns witnesses to a leading-question condition or a neutral-question condition. Which design is this?
- A longitudinal cohort study
- A content analysis of trial transcripts
- A controlled experiment with random allocation
- A case study of one witness
-
Which research method would be most suitable to examine how a real police line-up affects identification over several cases?
- A field study that records identifications in real police settings
- A meta-analysis of crime statistics only, which pools the results of published police figures
- A laboratory experiment with students only, who view a staged event in a controlled room
- A single case study of one suspect, followed through the investigation by one researcher
-
A laboratory study finds that weapon focus reduces recall of the face. Why might a field experiment be used to check this finding?
- To avoid all ethical concerns in the study, because the setting is more natural for participants
- To prove the laboratory result was entirely wrong, so that the earlier study can be discarded
- To test whether the effect holds in a realistic setting with real stress and distraction
- To remove the need for any control group, since the field setting already provides one
-
Which research method would be most suitable to explore a witness's detailed experience of a traumatic event?
- A case study or qualitative interview
- A meta-analysis of published effect sizes
- A cross-sectional survey of thousands of adults
- A large-scale laboratory experiment with random assignment
-
Which strength do laboratory experiments and field experiments share?
- Both can test a manipulated variable and measure its effect on memory
- Both avoid all ethical concerns, because the participants are always fully informed in advance
- Both always have perfect ecological validity, since they both reflect real life in every respect
- Both require no participants at all, since the results come from the researcher's own records
-
Which evaluation of case studies in eyewitness research is most balanced?
- They prove general rules about all witnesses, because a single detailed case shows what all people do
- They are useless because they lack any detail, so they cannot inform any theory about memory
- They are always more reliable than experiments, because the researcher knows the witness personally
- They provide rich, detailed insight but cannot establish general rules because they involve few participants
-
What does the term 'independent variable' mean in a field experiment on eyewitness testimony?
- The number of participants in each group, which the researcher records to check the sample sizes
- The time of day the experiment takes place, which the researcher notes to check for fatigue effects
- The measure of memory accuracy recorded by the researcher, such as the number of correct details
- The factor the researcher changes or manipulates, such as the type of question asked
-
What does the term 'dependent variable' refer to in an eyewitness experiment?
- The measured outcome, such as the number of correct details recalled
- The room in which the experiment is conducted
- The variable the researcher manipulates in each condition
- The age of each participant in years
-
A field experiment measures how many details a witness recalls after a leading question. Which is the dependent variable?
- Type of question asked
- Gender of the witness
- Number of details recalled
- Location of the study
-
Which design choice most improves internal validity in an eyewitness experiment?
- Using only participants who already know the answer, so that the scoring is simple and quick to do
- Changing the procedure for each participant, so that each one has a different experience of the task
- Allowing each participant to choose their own condition, so that they feel more involved in the study
- Random allocation of participants to conditions with standardised procedures
-
Why might a researcher choose to use a between-subjects design in an eyewitness experiment?
- To ensure that all participants are the same person
- To guarantee that all participants recall identical details
- To remove the need for a control condition
- To avoid practice or order effects that could arise if the same people took every condition
Related quizzes
- Biological and social explanations of crime Quiz · 6.1.1 · 20 questions
- Understanding offenders: cognitive and ethical interviews and formulation Quiz · 6.1.2 · 20 questions
- Treatments for offenders: CBT and biological treatment Quiz · 6.1.3 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting eyewitness testimony Quiz · 6.1.4 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting jury decision-making Quiz · 6.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in criminal behaviour Quiz · 6.1.6 · 20 questions
- Data analysis, reliability and validity in criminological research Quiz · 6.2.2 · 20 questions
- Loftus and Palmer, Bradbury and Williams, Valentine and Mesout, and Howells studies Quiz · 6.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: eyewitness testimony and jury bias Quiz · 6.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in criminological psychology Quiz · 6.6.1 · 20 questions