Lesson 6.1.6
6.1.6 Individual and developmental differences in criminal behaviour Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 6
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 6.1.6, Individual and developmental differences in criminal behaviour: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 6: Criminological psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which personality dimension is linked in the specification to criminal or anti-social behaviour?
- Height and body weight in childhood, which are recorded at school medicals and linked to later health
- Personality as a factor in criminal or anti-social behaviour
- Musical ability as measured by a school test, which is used to place pupils in music groups
- Handwriting style in adult life, which is sometimes analysed by experts for identity purposes
-
What does an individual difference affecting whether a self-fulfilling prophecy occurs mean?
- Labels never affect any individual, because people act on their own choices regardless of others
- Some people are more likely than others to act in line with a label, depending on personal characteristics
- Individual differences only matter for physical health, and not for how people respond to labels
- Every person responds to a label in exactly the same way, so individual differences make no difference
-
What is social learning theory?
- A theory that only physical punishment changes behaviour, since rewards and models have no effect
- A theory that behaviour is fixed by the genes at birth, so experience has little effect on what people do
- A theory of how behaviour is acquired through observation, imitation and reinforcement
- A theory of how memory is stored in the brain, based on the connections between nerve cells
-
According to social learning theory, how is criminal behaviour acquired?
- By inheriting a criminal gene from a parent, which fixes the behaviour across the whole lifespan
- By random accident with no learning involved, so the behaviour appears without any cause at all
- By observing and imitating models whose behaviour is rewarded
- By only reading legal texts about crime, which gives the person the knowledge to offend
-
Which is a developmental explanation of criminal behaviour that is linked to social factors?
- The Strange Situation test of infant attachment, which measures how infants respond to separation
- Psychological formulation of a single offence, which explains the reasons for one particular act
- Cognitive interview techniques for witnesses, which improve how well they recall the details of events
- The self-fulfilling prophecy, in which labels from others shape later behaviour
-
Which developmental factor could be part of a biological explanation of criminal behaviour?
- The choice of a university course at eighteen, which is linked to the person's later social mobility
- A preference for a particular school subject, which is linked to later career choice and earnings
- A preference for a particular food in adulthood, which is linked to diet and general health later on
- Early brain injury or a difficult temperament that influences later behaviour
-
A child who is frequently labelled as naughtiest in class starts to see themselves as a troublemaker. Which concept applies?
- Monotropy
- Stratified sampling
- Self-fulfilling prophecy
- Operant conditioning of attention
-
Why should individual differences be considered when studying developmental causes of crime?
- Two children exposed to the same risk factors may develop different outcomes
- Development is fixed before birth and cannot be affected by experience
- All children respond to risk in an identical way
- Individual differences are irrelevant to development
-
Which evaluation of social learning theory is most balanced?
- It has no relevance to development at all, since it deals only with adult behaviour in prison
- It is based only on genetic evidence from twin studies, so it cannot explain learned behaviour at all
- It fully explains every criminal act without exception, so no other theory is needed for any case
- It explains how behaviour can be acquired, but it may underplay biological and individual factors
-
A researcher tests whether children who watch an aggressive model are more likely to imitate aggression. Which theory is being tested?
- Social learning theory
- Monotropy
- The cognitive interview
- Formulation theory
-
Which statement about the role of gender in developmental explanations of crime is most accurate?
- Offending rates differ by gender, and developmental explanations should account for this
- Gender affects only physical appearance, not behaviour, so explanations need not consider it at all
- Gender is irrelevant because all children develop in the same way, whatever their sex or background
- Gender only affects which school children attend, since it has no other effect on behaviour
-
Why might a biological explanation be combined with a social one when explaining development?
- Biological vulnerability may interact with social experiences to produce different outcomes
- Biology and social factors never interact, so each one must be studied in complete isolation
- Social factors always cancel out biological ones, so the biology of a person has no effect on crime
- Biology has no role in development at all, since everything is decided by the social environment
-
A longitudinal study follows children from age five to age twenty-five. What is the main advantage for studying developmental causes of crime?
- It can measure only adult behaviour at one moment, so it cannot show how early factors matter
- It can show how early factors predict later offending within the same individuals
- It removes the need for any consent from participants, because they are followed without being asked
- It avoids all attrition over the study period, so every participant is always followed up in full
-
Which is a limitation of relying only on social learning theory to explain adult offending?
- It only applies to animals and not to humans, so it cannot be used to explain criminal behaviour
- It may not explain offending that arises from biological or personality factors
- It cannot explain any form of learned behaviour, because learning plays no part in the account
- It has been disproved by every study ever carried out, so it is no longer used in research
-
A young person with a history of impulsive behaviour and a poor learning environment offends. Which explanation best fits the interaction described?
- A cognitive explanation based only on memory, which looks at how the person stores and recalls events
- A purely social explanation with no individual factors, which ignores the person's own temperament
- An interactionist explanation combining individual vulnerability with social learning
- A purely genetic explanation with no environment, which treats the behaviour as fixed from birth
-
Which individual difference might make a self-fulfilling prophecy less likely to occur?
- A lack of any social contact at all, which means the person has no one to check the label against
- Strong self-esteem and supportive relationships that buffer against negative labels
- A tendency to accept labels without question, which makes the person more likely to act them out
- Frequent exposure to negative labels from peers, which strengthens the expectation that the label will be lived up to
-
A school intervention aims to stop a label from shaping a child's later behaviour. Which theoretical principle does it apply?
- Making the child's label permanent and public, so that everyone can see and respond to it
- Removing all supportive relationships around the child, so that the child depends on the label alone
- Reducing the self-fulfilling prophecy by changing how the child is labelled and treated
- Increasing the child's exposure to criminal models, which teaches the child what is expected of them
-
Which statement best describes the link between individual differences and developmental explanations of crime?
- Individual differences are always caused by criminal behaviour, so they cannot be a cause of it
- Individual differences have no effect on development, because children follow the same path wherever they live
- Individual differences shape how developmental risks are experienced and whether they lead to offending
- Individual differences only matter for adult offenders, and have no role in the lives of young people
-
What does reinforcement mean in social learning theory?
- A punishment that removes all future learning, so the person stops responding to any form of consequence
- A label given by a teacher to a pupil, which the pupil then uses to describe their own behaviour
- A consequence that increases the likelihood that a behaviour will be repeated
- A model who never displays any behaviour, so there is nothing for the observer to copy or learn from
-
In a study of 200 young people, 30 per cent showed early behavioural problems and 25 per cent of those later offended. How many later offended?
- 45
- 60
- 15
- 30
Related quizzes
- Biological and social explanations of crime Quiz · 6.1.1 · 20 questions
- Understanding offenders: cognitive and ethical interviews and formulation Quiz · 6.1.2 · 20 questions
- Treatments for offenders: CBT and biological treatment Quiz · 6.1.3 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting eyewitness testimony Quiz · 6.1.4 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting jury decision-making Quiz · 6.1.5 · 20 questions
- Eyewitness research methods, sampling and ethics Quiz · 6.2.1 · 20 questions
- Data analysis, reliability and validity in criminological research Quiz · 6.2.2 · 20 questions
- Loftus and Palmer, Bradbury and Williams, Valentine and Mesout, and Howells studies Quiz · 6.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: eyewitness testimony and jury bias Quiz · 6.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in criminological psychology Quiz · 6.6.1 · 20 questions