Lesson 5.2.2
5.2.2 Analysing clinical data and HCPC guidelines Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 5
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 5.2.2, Analysing clinical data and HCPC guidelines: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 5: Clinical psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What defines a longitudinal study?
- The same participants are studied repeatedly over a period of time
- Different groups are studied at one single point in time
- The results of many separate studies are pooled statistically
- Two cultures are compared at one moment
-
What defines a cross-sectional study?
- The same participants are followed for many years and measured repeatedly across that period
- Existing data from a national archive is reanalysed by a researcher for a new purpose entirely
- Research is conducted only in one country, with participants recruited from a single location
- Different groups, often of different ages, are studied at one point in time
-
What is a meta-analysis?
- A detailed study of one individual over several years, recording changes in behaviour
- A statistical combination of results from many studies addressing the same question
- A single experiment repeated with a larger sample to confirm the original result is accurate
- A survey of attitudes in several cultures carried out at one time, with the same questions
-
What are primary data in research?
- Data taken from a national archive without analysis
- Data collected directly by the researcher for the specific study
- Data that cannot be quantified in any way
- Data collected earlier by someone else and reanalysed
-
What are secondary data in research?
- Data that are always qualitative in form
- Data gathered only from participants in a laboratory
- Data collected directly by the researcher at the start of a study
- Data collected earlier by others and reanalysed for a new purpose
-
What is cross-cultural research?
- Studying only one culture in great depth
- Comparing two groups within the same school
- Comparing the same research question across different cultures
- Analysing the same participant across several decades
-
Which is a disadvantage of longitudinal designs?
- They are always cheaper than cross-sectional designs
- Results are available immediately after the first session
- They never require ethical approval
- Participants may drop out over time, causing attrition
-
A team gathers depression scores from the same 200 adults at ages 20, 25 and 30. Which design is used and what is its main advantage?
- Meta-analysis, because it pools results from many studies
- Case study, because it gives an in-depth account of one person
- Longitudinal, because it tracks change within the same individuals
- Cross-sectional, because it avoids all attrition
-
Four studies report prevalence of 10, 20, 30 and 40 per cent. What is the simple unweighted mean prevalence?
- 20 per cent
- 25 per cent
- 35 per cent
- 30 per cent
-
A researcher reuses survey data collected by a national health agency. What is the main advantage?
- Large existing samples can be analysed at low cost
- The data are collected from participants who are known personally
- The researcher avoids any need for ethical considerations
- The researcher can control exactly how each question was asked
-
Which approach would best test whether a diagnostic symptom profile is universal?
- A laboratory experiment with a single group of students who all share the same background
- Cross-cultural comparison using the same measure in several countries
- A single case study of one patient in one clinic, followed closely over a long period
- A survey of one town's residents taken at one point in time, using local interviewers
-
A study collects data from a single clinic on one day. What is the main limitation for generalisation?
- The clinic must have been funded by the government
- The participants must have been paid for the session
- The data cannot be analysed with statistics
- Results may not generalise beyond that clinic and that time
-
Why might a meta-analysis overestimate an effect?
- Studies with significant results are more likely to be published, inflating the pooled effect
- Statistical tests cannot be applied to pooled data drawn from several different studies at once
- Meta-analyses always include too few participants overall, so the pooled estimate is unreliable
- Researchers always report every result they obtain, including those that are not significant
-
A longitudinal study finds mood declines over five years. Why is the cause hard to establish?
- Longitudinal studies never record any change at all, because the same people are tested repeatedly
- The participants were too old to be studied at all using the longitudinal method in the study
- Mood cannot be measured reliably over any period, so no change can be recorded in the study
- Maturation and other time-linked variables may explain the change, so the cause cannot be isolated
-
A researcher uses a cross-sectional design for a quick adolescent study. What is the key trade-off?
- It guarantees the same participants are measured twice
- It is slower and more expensive but tracks development directly
- It is quicker and cheaper but cannot track individual development over time
- It requires no participants and relies only on records
-
Which problem most threatens the comparability of a questionnaire used across cultures?
- Translation changes the meaning of items, so the measure may not be equivalent
- The questions are answered with a pencil rather than a pen, which changes how people respond
- Participants are always given the same reward for completing it, which biases their answers
- The questionnaire has too many pages to print easily, which makes it costly to distribute widely
-
Which evaluation of meta-analysis as a method is the most balanced?
- It removes the need for any study to be designed carefully, because pooling corrects every flaw
- It increases statistical power and generalisability but depends on the quality and comparability of included studies
- It always produces perfectly accurate results whatever the quality or design of the input studies
- It is useless because it cannot combine data from several studies into one overall estimate at all
-
Three studies have 40, 60 and 100 participants with effect sizes 0.2, 0.5 and 0.4. What is the sample-size weighted mean effect?
- 0.37
- 0.30
- 0.39
- 0.45
-
A researcher wants to know whether a treatment effect persists one year later. Which design is most appropriate?
- A single case study with no repeated testing
- A cross-sectional comparison of treated and untreated groups at one time
- A longitudinal design with a follow-up measurement of the same participants
- A meta-analysis of studies that include no follow-up
-
Which design is better for showing that an early factor predicts a later outcome?
- A case study, because it focuses on one individual
- A laboratory experiment, because it isolates the factor from time
- A longitudinal design, because the factor is measured before the outcome
- A cross-sectional design, because it measures both at the same time
Related quizzes
- Diagnosing mental disorders and classification systems Quiz · 5.1.1 · 20 questions
- Schizophrenia: symptoms and explanations Quiz · 5.1.2 · 20 questions
- Treatments for schizophrenia Quiz · 5.1.3 · 20 questions
- Second disorder (anorexia, OCD or depression): features and explanations Quiz · 5.1.4 · 20 questions
- Treatments for the second disorder Quiz · 5.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in mental health Quiz · 5.1.6 · 20 questions
- Researching mental health: longitudinal, cross-cultural and case study methods Quiz · 5.2.1 · 20 questions
- Rosenhan and contemporary clinical studies Quiz · 5.3.1 · 20 questions
- Key question: mental health in society Quiz · 5.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in clinical psychology Quiz · 5.6.1 · 20 questions