Lesson 1.1
1.1 Proof by mathematical induction Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Further Maths, Unit 1
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 1.1, Proof by mathematical induction: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Further Maths (9FM0), Unit 1: Proof, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
In a proof by mathematical induction, what is the purpose of the base case?
- To show the statement holds for the first value of n, starting the chain of implications
- To assume the statement is false and derive a contradiction for the first value
- To show the statement holds only for n = 0 and never for any larger value of n
- To show the statement holds for every integer at once without any further argument
-
What is the name given to the assumption that the statement is true for n = k in an induction proof?
- The contrapositive
- The converse statement
- The inductive hypothesis
- The base case
-
Which statement is the correct pattern for the sum of the first n odd numbers?
- 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n - 1) = n(n + 1)
- 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n - 1) = n^2
- 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n - 1) = n^3
- 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n - 1) = 2n^2
-
A statement is to be proved by induction for all integers n >= 2. At which value must the base case be checked?
- n = 3
- n = 1
- n = 0
- n = 2
-
For the result sum of r^2 from r = 1 to n equal to n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6, what is the value of both sides when n = 1?
- Both sides equal 6
- Both sides equal 2
- Both sides equal 1
- The left side is 1 and the right side is 2
-
Why is checking several specific values of n not, by itself, a valid proof that a statement holds for all positive integers?
- Checking values proves the statement is false whenever the check succeeds
- Checking values only works for statements about negative integers, which are excluded
- Checking values is always a valid proof for any statement about positive integers
- Finitely many checks cannot cover infinitely many integers, so a general argument linking each case to the next is needed
-
What is the value of sum of r(r + 1) from r = 1 to 4?
- 36
- 30
- 40
- 50
-
For sum of r(r + 1) from r = 1 to n equal to n(n + 1)(n + 2)/3, what must be added to the sum when moving from n = k to n = k + 1?
- (k + 1)
- (k + 1)(k + 2)
- k(k + 1)
- (k + 2)(k + 3)
-
For M = [[3, -4], [1, -1]], what is the (1,2) entry of M squared?
- 8
- -3
- -8
- -4
-
Which expression is divisible by 6 for every positive integer n?
- 7^n + 1
- 7^n - 3
- 7^n - 1
- 7^n - 2
-
In proving 6 divides 7^n - 1 by induction, which expression for 7^(k+1) - 1 shows divisibility by 6 once 6 divides 7^k - 1 is assumed?
- 7(7^k + 1) - 6
- 6 x 7^k + 1
- 7(7^k - 1) - 6
- 7(7^k - 1) + 6
-
What is the base case check for the inequality 2^n >= n + 1 at n = 0?
- 1 >= 1, which holds
- 0 >= 1, which fails
- 1 > 1, which is false so the base case fails
- 2 >= 1, which holds
-
In the inductive step for 2^n >= n + 1, which chain completes the argument from 2^k >= k + 1?
- 2^(k+1) = 2 x 2^k >= 2k + 2 >= k + 2
- 2^(k+1) = 2^k + 1 >= k + 2
- 2^(k+1) >= k + 2 directly, without using the inductive hypothesis
- 2^(k+1) >= 2k, so the result holds only for k >= 1 and needs no further argument
-
What is the sum of the cubes from r = 1 to 3?
- 45
- 36
- 24
- 27
-
If the sum of cubes from r = 1 to n equals n^2(n + 1)^2/4, what is the sum when n = 4?
- 100
- 64
- 120
- 90
-
For the statement that k^3 + 2k is divisible by 3, which expansion correctly shows (k+1)^3 + 2(k+1) = (k^3 + 2k) + 3(k^2 + k + 1)?
- (k^3 + 2k) + 3(k^2 + 2k + 1)
- (k^3 + 2k) + (k^2 + k + 1)
- (k^3 + 2k) + 3(k^2 + k + 1)
- (k^3 + 2k) + 3(k^2 + k)
-
In the matrix induction for M^n = [[2n+1, -4n], [n, 1-2n]], which expression gives the (2,2) entry of M^(k+1) = M x M^k?
- -(4k) - 2k, which simplifies to -6k
- -4k + (1 - 2k), which simplifies to 1 - 6k
- 1 - 2k - 1, which simplifies to -2k
- -4k - (1 - 2k), which simplifies to -2k - 1 = 1 - 2(k+1)
-
Why is verifying only the base case n = 1 insufficient to prove a statement by induction?
- It does not by itself link the case n = k to n = k + 1, so no conclusion for larger n follows
- It must be replaced by a check at n = 0, which induction never allows
- It proves only that the statement is false, so it cannot support a positive conclusion
- It is sufficient only when the statement involves matrices, not when it involves sums
-
A statement P(n) is true for n = 1, and P(k) true implies P(k + 2) true for every positive integer k. Which values does this establish?
- All odd positive integers only
- Only n = 1 and n = 2
- All positive integers
- All even positive integers
-
In strong induction, what assumption is made in the inductive step?
- That the statement is false for k + 1
- That the statement holds for k only and fails for every smaller value
- That the statement holds for all values from the base case up to k
- That n is an even integer
Related quizzes
- Quadratic equations and complex arithmetic Quiz · 2.1-2.2 · 20 questions
- Matrix arithmetic and inverses Quiz · 3.1-3.2 · 20 questions
- Expectation of discrete random variables Quiz · 3B.1.1 · 20 questions
- The Poisson distribution Quiz · 3B.2.1 · 20 questions
- Geometric and negative binomial models Quiz · 3B.3.1 · 20 questions
- Hypothesis tests for the Poisson distribution Quiz · 3B.4.1 · 20 questions
- Applying the Central Limit Theorem Quiz · 3B.5.1 · 20 questions
- Goodness of fit tests for discrete distributions Quiz · 3B.6.1 · 20 questions
- Definition and derivation of probability generating functions Quiz · 3B.7.1 · 20 questions
- Type I and Type II errors Quiz · 3B.8.1 · 20 questions