Lesson 3.6.2
3.6.2 Impact and limits of government intervention Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Economics A, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.6.2, Impact and limits of government intervention: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Economics A (9EC0), Unit 3: Theme 3: Business behaviour and the labour market, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
How can government intervention affect prices?
- Prices are set only by firms and never by government policy
- Prices are unaffected by any form of intervention at all
- Price regulation or competition policy can lower prices for consumers in monopolised markets
- Intervention always raises prices in every market it touches
-
How can intervention affect a firm's profit?
- Profit regulation or price caps can reduce supernormal profit
- Regulation always raises the firm's profits in every market
- Regulation has no effect on profit under any policy
- Regulation requires firms to make losses in every period
-
Intervention can improve allocative efficiency but may affect dynamic efficiency. Why?
- Innovation is unrelated to the profits that firms earn
- Tight price or profit regulation can reduce the funds and incentives firms have to invest in innovation
- Regulation always increases innovation in every industry
- Dynamic efficiency depends only on the price of the product
-
Quality standards can improve quality but may have what drawback?
- They have no effect on cost or on choice for consumers
- They make quality unchangeable in every market they cover
- They always reduce quality, since firms cut corners to comply
- They may raise costs and limit choice for consumers
-
Which is an example of how intervention can affect consumer choice?
- Intervention always increases choice in every market
- Choice never changes after any intervention in a market
- Deregulation may increase choice, while restrictive rules may reduce it
- Choice is determined only by consumers' incomes and never by rules
-
Regulatory capture occurs when:
- The firm is taken into public ownership by the regulator
- Regulators always protect consumers only and never the industry
- Regulators are abolished by the firms they are meant to regulate
- Regulators come to serve the interests of the firms they regulate, weakening regulation
-
Asymmetric information limits regulation because:
- Firms know more about their costs than regulators do, making it hard to set the right price cap
- Regulators always know costs exactly, so there is no problem
- The problem only affects consumers and never regulators
- Information is symmetric in all regulated markets by definition
-
A regulator sets a price cap too low. What is the likely result?
- Firms may cut investment or quality, and some may exit the market
- Firms increase investment because profits are guaranteed
- Output rises beyond the efficient level in the market
- Quality rises automatically as prices are cut in every case
-
Which is an example of regulatory capture?
- A regulator publishes an annual report on its activities
- A regulator adopts the industry's view and lobbies for weaker rules in exchange for later jobs in the industry
- A regulator enforces strict rules after public consultation with consumers
- A regulator sets price caps based on an independent cost audit
-
Why might a price cap cause under-investment?
- Investment is always guaranteed by regulation in every market
- Price caps always raise investment because they guarantee demand
- Price caps have no effect on the costs of investment
- If the cap is below the level needed to cover investment costs, firms may cut back on capital spending
-
Firms raise quality under regulation but also raise costs. Which concept best describes this?
- A trade-off between quality and cost, where quality gains may be offset by higher prices
- Quality and cost are always unrelated in every market
- Higher quality always reduces cost for the firm
- Quality standards never affect cost in any industry
-
Regulators face limits because of:
- Perfect foresight about future market conditions and costs
- Limited information, time and resources, and the risk of political pressure
- No political influence on regulatory decisions at any time
- Unlimited information and budgets in every regulatory body
-
Why might intervention in a natural monopoly be difficult?
- Average cost is always below marginal cost for every firm
- Natural monopolies have no fixed costs at all
- Marginal cost pricing may not cover total costs, so firms may make losses without a subsidy
- Natural monopolies operate in perfect competition
-
How can intervention reduce consumer choice?
- Rules introduce more firms into the market automatically
- Rules remove all product differences between sellers
- Rules restrict which firms can supply a product, leaving consumers with fewer options
- Rules always create greater variety of products for buyers
-
Evaluate government intervention as a response to market failure.
- Intervention always increases welfare by definition of the term
- It can correct failures, but costs, information problems and capture mean outcomes may be worse than the original failure in some cases
- Intervention is never needed in any market at any time
- Intervention always solves market failure in every case
-
Why does asymmetric information limit regulators' price setting?
- Regulators set prices without any information at all
- Asymmetric information only affects consumers, not regulators
- Regulators cannot observe true costs precisely, so caps may be set too high or too low
- Regulators know all costs and profits exactly in every market
-
A regulator estimates a firm's marginal cost at £6, but the true MC is £4. It sets a cap at £7. What is the effect?
- Output is above the efficient level because the cap is too high
- The cap has no effect on output in any case
- The firm makes a loss at every output because the cap is set too high
- The cap leaves price above true marginal cost, so output is below the efficient level and the firm earns extra profit
-
Why might government intervention reduce dynamic efficiency?
- Innovation is unrelated to the profits that firms earn in any market
- Dynamic efficiency depends only on the price of the product in the market
- Regulation always increases innovation in every industry
- Tight price or profit regulation can reduce the funds and incentives firms have to invest in innovation
-
Which is the strongest evaluative point about the limits of regulation?
- Limits are irrelevant to the design of policy in any market
- Regulation is always perfect and free of any limits
- Limits only affect firms and never affect consumers at all
- Regulators may lack information and face capture, so the benefits of regulation may be reduced in practice
-
A government wants to protect consumers and encourage investment. Which policy best balances these aims?
- A price cap that allows a reasonable return on capital, combined with quality and performance targets
- No regulation at all, leaving the firm unchecked
- Nationalisation with no performance standards in place
- A price freeze at current prices with no allowance for investment
Related quizzes
- Sizes and types of firms Quiz · 3.1.1 · 20 questions
- How businesses grow Quiz · 3.1.2 · 20 questions
- Demergers Quiz · 3.1.3 · 20 questions
- Business objectives Quiz · 3.2.1 · 20 questions
- Revenue Quiz · 3.3.1 · 20 questions
- Costs Quiz · 3.3.2 · 20 questions
- Economies and diseconomies of scale Quiz · 3.3.3 · 20 questions
- Normal profits, supernormal profits and losses Quiz · 3.3.4 · 20 questions
- Efficiency Quiz · 3.4.1 · 20 questions
- Perfect competition Quiz · 3.4.2 · 20 questions