Lesson 3.6.1
3.6.1 Government intervention in business behaviour Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Economics A, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.6.1, Government intervention in business behaviour: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Economics A (9EC0), Unit 3: Theme 3: Business behaviour and the labour market, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Government intervention to control mergers typically involves:
- Banning all mergers in every market by law
- Leaving control of mergers entirely to consumers alone
- Competition authorities blocking or requiring remedies for mergers that would substantially lessen competition
- Encouraging unlimited mergers with no checks in any sector
-
Price regulation of a monopoly means:
- A regulator sets the price at the level of maximum profit for the firm
- A regulator sets minimum prices to raise the monopolist's profit
- A regulator sets a maximum price, such as a price cap on a utility, to limit monopoly pricing
- A regulator sets prices with no link to the firm's costs
-
Profit regulation involves:
- Banning profit-making firms from operating in the market
- Requiring the firm to pay all its profit to the government as tax
- Limiting the rate of return a monopolist can earn, to prevent excessive profit
- Paying a subsidy on all of the firm's profit each year
-
Quality standards and performance targets are used to:
- Remove standards altogether for monopoly firms in the market
- Set minimum service or quality levels that regulated firms must meet
- Set maximum quality levels for all goods sold in the market
- Ban all services from being provided by private firms
-
Privatisation is best described as:
- The transfer of private assets to the state for public use
- The creation of a new public corporation to run an industry
- A ban on private firms operating in a particular sector
- The transfer of state-owned assets to private ownership
-
Competitive tendering for government contracts means:
- Government sets the prices of all contracts directly itself
- Government abolishes all contracts for public services in the sector
- Government awards contracts to one firm regardless of price or quality
- Government awards contracts to the firm offering the best value through open bidding
-
Deregulation involves:
- Creating new legal monopolies in previously competitive markets
- Removing rules and barriers that limit entry and competition
- Adding new rules to restrict entry into a market
- Transferring firms into public ownership to run them
-
Nationalisation is the:
- Banning of monopolies by an act of parliament
- Regulation of private firms without any change of ownership
- Transfer of private firms into public ownership, for example to protect employees or suppliers
- Transfer of public firms into private ownership in the market
-
A water company's prices are capped by a regulator using a formula. Which intervention is this?
- Price regulation through a price cap
- Nationalisation of the water company by the state
- Quality standards applied to the company's services only
- Deregulation of the water industry to allow more entry
-
Which intervention most directly promotes contestability?
- Creating new legal monopolies to protect the industry
- Granting exclusive rights to incumbents in the market
- Deregulation that lowers entry barriers
- Raising licence fees for new entrants to the market
-
A government support scheme for small businesses aims to:
- Raise prices for consumers in the market
- Enhance competition by supporting new and smaller firms
- Create monopolies by giving firms exclusive rights
- Reduce competition by favouring the largest firms in the market
-
A government nationalises a firm to protect its employees. What is a likely cost?
- Taxes fall automatically once the firm is nationalised
- Unemployment falls to zero immediately in the sector
- There is no cost at all, since the state owns the firm
- Taxpayers may bear the financing costs, and lower efficiency may follow without competitive pressure
-
Which is an example of restrictions on the monopsony power of firms?
- A subsidy paid to monopsonist employers to keep wages low
- A ban on all hiring by firms in the market
- A minimum wage that stops employers paying below competitive wages
- A maximum wage set by employers in the sector
-
Why might a regulator set a price just above average cost?
- To allow normal profit and some investment, while limiting monopoly profit
- To force the firm out of the market by setting a low price
- To maximise the monopolist's profit as much as possible
- To eliminate all profit, including normal profit, for the firm
-
Evaluate the use of price regulation.
- It always improves efficiency without any cost to anyone
- It is useless, because prices never matter to consumers
- It removes all monopoly power automatically in every market
- It can curb monopoly pricing, but information gaps and incentives for poor quality may limit its effectiveness
-
Why might a competition authority impose remedies rather than block a merger?
- To protect the profits of the monopolist firm
- Remedies such as selling off part of the business can keep efficiency gains while limiting market power
- Because remedies are illegal under UK competition law
- Because mergers can never affect competition in any market
-
A regulator caps a monopolist's price at £10, where MC is £4 and demand gives Q = 100 at £10. Without regulation, the price is £14 and Q = 60. What is the likely effect?
- Output falls to zero because the cap makes production unprofitable
- Profit rises above the unregulated level because of the cap
- Consumers lose all welfare because the price is capped
- Output rises towards the efficient level, raising consumer surplus, but the firm may earn lower profit
-
Compare nationalisation and regulation. What is the strongest difference?
- Regulation transfers ownership to the state in every case
- Nationalisation is always cheaper for consumers than regulation
- Nationalisation transfers ownership and control to the state, while regulation keeps private ownership under rules
- The two policies are identical in their effects on ownership
-
Why might privatisation fail to increase competition?
- Privatisation always creates many competitors in the market
- Privatisation has no effect on prices or service quality
- Privatisation abolishes all monopoly power in the industry
- Privatised firms may keep natural monopoly features, so market power can persist without rivals
-
Which evaluation is strongest for competitive tendering?
- It always raises prices for the government and the public
- It can reduce costs and improve value, but contracts may be poorly specified and bidders may be few
- It has no effect on value for money in any contract
- It eliminates all monopoly power in the sector immediately
Related quizzes
- Sizes and types of firms Quiz · 3.1.1 · 20 questions
- How businesses grow Quiz · 3.1.2 · 20 questions
- Demergers Quiz · 3.1.3 · 20 questions
- Business objectives Quiz · 3.2.1 · 20 questions
- Revenue Quiz · 3.3.1 · 20 questions
- Costs Quiz · 3.3.2 · 20 questions
- Economies and diseconomies of scale Quiz · 3.3.3 · 20 questions
- Normal profits, supernormal profits and losses Quiz · 3.3.4 · 20 questions
- Efficiency Quiz · 3.4.1 · 20 questions
- Perfect competition Quiz · 3.4.2 · 20 questions