Lesson 3.4.4
3.4.4 Oligopoly Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Economics A, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.4.4, Oligopoly: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Economics A (9EC0), Unit 3: Theme 3: Business behaviour and the labour market, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Which best describes an oligopoly?
- A market of identical firms that all accept the market price
- A market with a single firm and no rivals at all
- A market dominated by a few large firms with high concentration and strong interdependence
- A market with many small firms that take no notice of one another
-
Which features are typical of oligopoly?
- High barriers to entry and exit, a high concentration ratio, interdependence and product differentiation
- Zero barriers to entry and exit, with many small firms
- Single-firm dominance with no substitute products
- Identical products sold by price-taking firms
-
Three firms have market shares of 30 per cent, 20 per cent and 15 per cent. What is the 3-firm concentration ratio?
- 75 per cent
- 15 per cent
- 65 per cent
- 50 per cent
-
Interdependence in oligopoly means that:
- Firms compete only on product quality and never on price
- Each firm's decisions depend on the likely reactions of its rivals
- Each firm ignores what its rivals do when setting its price
- Firms set prices independently of demand in the market
-
What is the difference between overt and tacit collusion?
- Overt collusion is an open agreement, while tacit collusion is an informal understanding with no written agreement
- Tacit collusion requires government approval before it can take place
- Overt collusion means firms compete fiercely on price in the market
- Tacit collusion is always illegal and overt collusion is always legal
-
A cartel is best described as:
- A government body that regulates the prices of firms in an industry
- A formal agreement among firms to fix prices or output and raise joint profits
- A merger of two rivals into one firm under single ownership
- A group of firms competing hard on price to force each other out
-
Price leadership in oligopoly refers to:
- One firm sets the price and the other firms follow
- All firms setting different prices with no reaction to one another
- Firms setting prices at random with no reaction to rivals
- The government setting prices for all firms in the market
-
What does the prisoner's dilemma show in oligopoly?
- Cooperation is always the dominant strategy for every firm in the game
- There is never an equilibrium in any game between two firms
- Both firms always gain by raising their prices together in the market
- Each firm has an incentive to cheat, leading to a worse outcome for both than cooperation would give
-
Two firms each choose a high or low price. If both set high, each earns £10m; if both set low, each earns £4m; if one undercuts the other, it earns £14m and the other earns £0. What is the Nash equilibrium?
- No equilibrium exists because each firm changes its choice each time
- Both set high prices, since this gives the highest joint profit
- One sets a high price and the other sets a low price
- Both set low prices, since undercutting is the dominant strategy for each firm
-
Predatory pricing is best described as:
- Setting one fixed price for all customers across the market
- Offering lower prices to protect the market share of a rival
- Setting price above cost to attract rivals into the market
- Setting price below cost temporarily to drive rivals out, then raising the price once they leave
-
Limit pricing aims to:
- Force rivals to merge into a single firm in the market
- Set price low enough to deter entry while still earning some profit
- Set price at marginal cost for ever, regardless of rivals
- Raise price to attract entrants and share the market
-
Which is an example of non-price competition?
- Advertising, branding, loyalty schemes and after-sales service
- Lowering production costs by replacing machinery
- Cutting prices below cost permanently to win customers
- Changes in government taxes applied to all firms
-
A price war in an oligopoly is:
- A government freeze on all prices in the market
- A single price rise made by all firms at the same time
- An agreement to fix the price at the monopoly level
- A repeated cycle of price cuts by rivals responding to each other, which can squeeze profits
-
A high concentration ratio in a market suggests:
- Perfect competition with price-taking firms
- A low barrier to entry for new firms
- Many firms with little market power each
- Few firms dominate, so market power and interdependence are likely
-
Evaluate the view that oligopoly always harms consumers.
- True, because oligopolists are always productively inefficient
- True in every case, because oligopolists always collude
- False, because oligopoly has no prices to affect consumers
- Overstated: collusion can raise prices, but rivalry can drive innovation and non-price competition, so effects depend on conduct
-
Market shares are A 40 per cent, B 30 per cent, C 20 per cent and D 10 per cent. What is the 2-firm concentration ratio?
- 30 per cent
- 90 per cent
- 70 per cent
- 40 per cent
-
Why does collusion tend to break down?
- Collusion is always legal and therefore stable over time
- Each firm gains by cheating for a short-run gain, and detection and punishment are imperfect
- Firms never have any incentive to cheat on a cartel agreement
- Consumers always refuse to buy from colluding firms in the market
-
The kinked demand curve model implies that:
- Demand is perfectly elastic at all prices in the market
- Prices are sticky, because rivals match price cuts but ignore price rises
- Firms always cut prices together, so prices never stay stable
- Rivals always match price rises, so prices change frequently
-
Which market structure best describes a market with five firms holding 85 per cent of sales and high entry barriers?
- Perfect competition
- Monopoly
- Monopsony
- Oligopoly
-
Evaluate the usefulness of game theory for analysing oligopoly.
- Applicable only to monopolies, not to oligopolies
- Perfectly predicts every outcome in every oligopoly market
- Useless, because firms in an oligopoly never interact with each other
- Helpful for showing interdependence and strategic choices, but predictions depend on assumptions about rivals' payoffs and repeated play
Related quizzes
- Sizes and types of firms Quiz · 3.1.1 · 20 questions
- How businesses grow Quiz · 3.1.2 · 20 questions
- Demergers Quiz · 3.1.3 · 20 questions
- Business objectives Quiz · 3.2.1 · 20 questions
- Revenue Quiz · 3.3.1 · 20 questions
- Costs Quiz · 3.3.2 · 20 questions
- Economies and diseconomies of scale Quiz · 3.3.3 · 20 questions
- Normal profits, supernormal profits and losses Quiz · 3.3.4 · 20 questions
- Efficiency Quiz · 3.4.1 · 20 questions
- Perfect competition Quiz · 3.4.2 · 20 questions