Lesson 5.6.2
5.6.2 Scientific community and evidence for evolution Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Biology A (Salters-Nuffield), Unit 5
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 5.6.2, Scientific community and evidence for evolution: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Biology A (Salters-Nuffield) (9BI0), Unit 5: On the Wild Side, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is the purpose of peer review in science?
- To guarantee that every published finding is true
- To remove the need for experiments in future research
- To check the quality of new evidence before it is accepted by the scientific community
- To make sure all papers agree with existing theories without question
-
Which part of the scientific community helps to validate new evidence for evolution?
- Only the general public through social media
- Only the government of each country
- Only commercial companies with no scientific training
- Scientific journals and conferences
-
How do proteomics and genomics support the theory of evolution?
- By proving that evolution never occurs
- By measuring only the size of organisms
- By comparing protein and DNA sequences
- By showing that all organisms are identical in every gene
-
Why are similarities in DNA sequences used as evidence for evolution?
- They show that organisms do not inherit any genes
- They reflect shared ancestry and relatedness
- They show that DNA is irrelevant to inheritance
- They prove that all species have identical genomes
-
A new fossil is found with features intermediate between two groups. Which step validates it as evidence for evolution?
- Keeping the fossil private so no one else can examine it
- Peer-reviewed publication and independent confirmation
- Accepting it immediately without any checking
- Using only the fossil's colour as the basis for the claim
-
What is a scientific theory, as used for evolution?
- A personal opinion held by a single scientist
- A fact that cannot be tested or ever changed
- A guess that has no supporting evidence at all
- A well-supported explanation backed by much evidence
-
Why do scientists value conferences as part of validating new evidence?
- They guarantee that all findings are correct
- They remove the need for any further testing
- They let findings be questioned before acceptance
- They make it unnecessary to publish results in journals
-
Which evidence from proteomics would be most useful in showing that two species share a common ancestor?
- Similar amino acid sequences in a shared protein
- The number of days each species typically lives
- The colour of the species' skin and fur
- The size of the species' home range area
-
What does the scientific community do when new genomic data conflict with an older classification?
- Destroys the old classification records
- Evaluates the new data and may revise the classification if it is well supported
- Stops all research into the species
- Ignores the data because it conflicts with the older classification
-
A claim about evolution is published without peer review. What is the main concern?
- It has not been checked by independent experts
- The claim is definitely wrong because it was not reviewed
- The claim is correct because it was published quickly
- The claim cannot be published under any circumstances
-
Why is it important that evidence for evolution comes from several independent lines, such as fossils, DNA and proteins?
- Independent evidence is never useful for science
- Using several lines of evidence proves evolution is impossible
- Independent lines of evidence agreeing strengthen it
- Only one line of evidence can ever be used
-
Which statement about the role of journals in evolution research is correct?
- Journals are only used for publishing opinions
- Journals publish findings without any checking
- Journals have no role in validating scientific evidence
- Journals publish peer-reviewed findings for scrutiny
-
Why do scientists sometimes revise the classification of organisms?
- Scientists enjoy changing names without reason
- Classifications are fixed for ever once published
- New molecular evidence can revise old groupings
- Classifications are never based on evidence
-
A new study finds that two species are much more closely related than thought. What is the best next step?
- Stop all research on those species
- Test it with independent data and peer review
- Accept the claim immediately without checking
- Assume the earlier classification must be right without evidence
-
Which is an example of proteomics evidence for evolution?
- Counting the number of leaves on a tree
- Comparing cytochrome c amino acid sequences
- Measuring the length of a bird's wings
- Recording the temperature of a habitat
-
Why is evidence from genomics considered important in evolutionary biology?
- Genomes are only found in fossils
- Whole-genome comparisons reveal the genetic relationships between species
- Genomes are identical in every species, so they show nothing
- Genomes do not contain any information about inheritance
-
How does the scientific community decide whether to accept a new theory of evolution?
- The theory is never accepted because it changes over time
- The theory is accepted by a single influential person
- The theory is accepted once it is popular in the media
- Evidence is tested, reviewed and confirmed
-
A student says evolution is just a guess because it has not been proven in every detail. What is the best evaluation?
- Incorrect, because theories are never tested
- Correct, because scientific theories are only guesses with no support
- Incorrect: theories rest on a large body of evidence
- Correct, because nothing in science can be supported by evidence
-
What does it mean for a scientific result to be replicated?
- Other researchers obtain similar results when they repeat the investigation
- The result is copied from a previous paper without being tested
- The result changes each time it is tested
- The result is seen only once and never repeated
-
Why are fossil evidence and molecular evidence combined in studies of evolutionary relationships?
- Fossils cannot contain any information about ancestry
- Each source can check and complement the other
- Molecular evidence cannot be used alongside fossils
- Only one source is ever needed to show relationships
Related quizzes
- Ecosystems, communities, populations and biotic and abiotic factors Quiz · 5.1.1 · 20 questions
- Succession to a climax community Quiz · 5.1.2 · 20 questions
- Overall photosynthesis and ATP Quiz · 5.2.1 · 20 questions
- Light-dependent reactions Quiz · 5.2.2 · 20 questions
- Light-independent reactions and chloroplast structure Quiz · 5.2.3 · 20 questions
- Primary productivity and transfer efficiency between trophic levels Quiz · 5.3.1 · 20 questions
- Evidence for climate change Quiz · 5.4.1 · 20 questions
- Causes of anthropogenic climate change and greenhouse gases Quiz · 5.4.2 · 20 questions
- Predictions, models and their limitations Quiz · 5.4.3 · 20 questions
- Effects of climate change on plants and animals Quiz · 5.4.4 · 20 questions