Lesson 5.6.2

5.6.2 Scientific community and evidence for evolution Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Biology A (Salters-Nuffield), Unit 5

20 questions

In partnership with Revision Ninja

Lesson 5.6.2, Scientific community and evidence for evolution: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Biology A (Salters-Nuffield) (9BI0), Unit 5: On the Wild Side, written with Revision Ninja.

Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.

Host this setFree Play

The 20 questions

  1. What is the purpose of peer review in science?

    • To guarantee that every published finding is true
    • To remove the need for experiments in future research
    • To check the quality of new evidence before it is accepted by the scientific community
    • To make sure all papers agree with existing theories without question
  2. Which part of the scientific community helps to validate new evidence for evolution?

    • Only the general public through social media
    • Only the government of each country
    • Only commercial companies with no scientific training
    • Scientific journals and conferences
  3. How do proteomics and genomics support the theory of evolution?

    • By proving that evolution never occurs
    • By measuring only the size of organisms
    • By comparing protein and DNA sequences
    • By showing that all organisms are identical in every gene
  4. Why are similarities in DNA sequences used as evidence for evolution?

    • They show that organisms do not inherit any genes
    • They reflect shared ancestry and relatedness
    • They show that DNA is irrelevant to inheritance
    • They prove that all species have identical genomes
  5. A new fossil is found with features intermediate between two groups. Which step validates it as evidence for evolution?

    • Keeping the fossil private so no one else can examine it
    • Peer-reviewed publication and independent confirmation
    • Accepting it immediately without any checking
    • Using only the fossil's colour as the basis for the claim
  6. What is a scientific theory, as used for evolution?

    • A personal opinion held by a single scientist
    • A fact that cannot be tested or ever changed
    • A guess that has no supporting evidence at all
    • A well-supported explanation backed by much evidence
  7. Why do scientists value conferences as part of validating new evidence?

    • They guarantee that all findings are correct
    • They remove the need for any further testing
    • They let findings be questioned before acceptance
    • They make it unnecessary to publish results in journals
  8. Which evidence from proteomics would be most useful in showing that two species share a common ancestor?

    • Similar amino acid sequences in a shared protein
    • The number of days each species typically lives
    • The colour of the species' skin and fur
    • The size of the species' home range area
  9. What does the scientific community do when new genomic data conflict with an older classification?

    • Destroys the old classification records
    • Evaluates the new data and may revise the classification if it is well supported
    • Stops all research into the species
    • Ignores the data because it conflicts with the older classification
  10. A claim about evolution is published without peer review. What is the main concern?

    • It has not been checked by independent experts
    • The claim is definitely wrong because it was not reviewed
    • The claim is correct because it was published quickly
    • The claim cannot be published under any circumstances
  11. Why is it important that evidence for evolution comes from several independent lines, such as fossils, DNA and proteins?

    • Independent evidence is never useful for science
    • Using several lines of evidence proves evolution is impossible
    • Independent lines of evidence agreeing strengthen it
    • Only one line of evidence can ever be used
  12. Which statement about the role of journals in evolution research is correct?

    • Journals are only used for publishing opinions
    • Journals publish findings without any checking
    • Journals have no role in validating scientific evidence
    • Journals publish peer-reviewed findings for scrutiny
  13. Why do scientists sometimes revise the classification of organisms?

    • Scientists enjoy changing names without reason
    • Classifications are fixed for ever once published
    • New molecular evidence can revise old groupings
    • Classifications are never based on evidence
  14. A new study finds that two species are much more closely related than thought. What is the best next step?

    • Stop all research on those species
    • Test it with independent data and peer review
    • Accept the claim immediately without checking
    • Assume the earlier classification must be right without evidence
  15. Which is an example of proteomics evidence for evolution?

    • Counting the number of leaves on a tree
    • Comparing cytochrome c amino acid sequences
    • Measuring the length of a bird's wings
    • Recording the temperature of a habitat
  16. Why is evidence from genomics considered important in evolutionary biology?

    • Genomes are only found in fossils
    • Whole-genome comparisons reveal the genetic relationships between species
    • Genomes are identical in every species, so they show nothing
    • Genomes do not contain any information about inheritance
  17. How does the scientific community decide whether to accept a new theory of evolution?

    • The theory is never accepted because it changes over time
    • The theory is accepted by a single influential person
    • The theory is accepted once it is popular in the media
    • Evidence is tested, reviewed and confirmed
  18. A student says evolution is just a guess because it has not been proven in every detail. What is the best evaluation?

    • Incorrect, because theories are never tested
    • Correct, because scientific theories are only guesses with no support
    • Incorrect: theories rest on a large body of evidence
    • Correct, because nothing in science can be supported by evidence
  19. What does it mean for a scientific result to be replicated?

    • Other researchers obtain similar results when they repeat the investigation
    • The result is copied from a previous paper without being tested
    • The result changes each time it is tested
    • The result is seen only once and never repeated
  20. Why are fossil evidence and molecular evidence combined in studies of evolutionary relationships?

    • Fossils cannot contain any information about ancestry
    • Each source can check and complement the other
    • Molecular evidence cannot be used alongside fossils
    • Only one source is ever needed to show relationships

All Pearson Edexcel Biology A (Salters-Nuffield) quizzes