Lesson Y8-U02-L04
Y8-U02-L04 Living in the Empire Winners and Losers Quiz: KS3 History, Unit 8
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson Y8-U02-L04, Living in the Empire Winners and Losers: 20 multiple choice questions for the KS3 History (National Curriculum), Unit 8: Year 8: Empire, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
Roughly what fraction of the world's land did Britain rule by 1900?
- About nine-tenths
- About a quarter
- About a tenth
- About half
-
What replaced enslaved labour on plantations after slavery was abolished?
- Machine work
- Indentured labour
- Free trade
- Royal soldiers
-
What does it mean to 'exploit' a place or people?
- To build a railway line across a region to speed up trade and the movement of goods
- To protect a colony from attack by rival powers and their navies at sea
- To write a letter of thanks to the local ruler for his kind hospitality
- To use a person or place unfairly for your own profit
-
What was indentured labour?
- Work done by children in factories only, in the cotton mills of northern England
- Work paid in gold by the Company to its clerks and senior officers each month
- Work done by a king's servants in the royal palaces of London and Windsor
- Work bound by contract for years, often for low pay and far from home
-
Where did British settlers take fertile land from local peoples, in areas such as the 'White Highlands'?
- Malta
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Kenya
-
Which group gained most from cheap cotton and captive colonial markets?
- Colonial soldiers in the army
- Indian farmers who grew the raw cotton
- Indian weavers in Bengal who lost work
- British manufacturers and traders
-
What happened to India's handloom weavers under British rule?
- They were given land in Kenya by the government in return for their work
- They became rich as British cloth sellers in the markets of London and Bristol
- They were ruined as cheap machine-made British cloth flooded the market
- They moved to London to make cloth in the factories of Lancashire and Yorkshire
-
What was India often called because of its wealth in the empire?
- The silver island, a name used for the wealthy trading towns along the coast
- The Golden Gate, a name given to the port that linked India to the Atlantic
- The land of ice, a name given to the frozen northern lands of the Empire
- The jewel in the crown
-
Which 1857 event was a large uprising in which Indian soldiers and others rose against British rule?
- The Peasants' Revolt
- The Boston Tea Party
- The Battle of Naseby
- The Indian Rebellion
-
Which type of resistance involved refusing to buy British goods?
- Everyday resistance
- Protest and boycotts
- Armed uprising
- Leaders and writers
-
What was 'everyday resistance' in the empire?
- Taking up weapons against the army and fighting the colonial forces in the hills
- Writing newspapers in London to persuade the government to change its policy
- Trading with other empires and smuggling goods across the frontier at night
- Refusing to cooperate, working slowly and keeping one's own culture
-
Indian farmers were taxed heavily and famine struck. Why were they counted as losers?
- They received free railway tickets to travel to the markets in the big cities
- They were not affected by famine, because their crops were always protected
- They were given free land by the British, and their farms grew richer each year
- They paid for British rule and grain was still sometimes exported during famines
-
Source A says British rule brought 'progress for the good of all'. Why might a British official write this?
- He was a weaver ruined by British cloth in the markets of his home village
- He was a famine victim who had survived the hunger but lost his family and land
- He benefited from the empire and wanted to justify British rule
- He was an Indian farmer who lost his land to the government and its tax collectors
-
Why was Dadabhai Naoroji's 'drain of wealth' argument important?
- It argued that British rule took India's wealth away and made India poorer
- It argued that railways should be banned because they only carried British soldiers
- It argued that India had no wealth at all and needed to be supported by Britain
- It argued that India should be ruled by Germany instead of by the British Empire
-
Why might railways be described as both a benefit and a tool of control?
- They never carried anyone, because the lines were never finished and the trains were never run
- They were built only for tourists visiting the hill stations in the cool mountains
- They were built by Indians alone for their own profit and their own private gain
- They helped some people travel but were built to move troops and goods for British control
-
Why was the 1857 Rebellion called a 'Mutiny' by the British but a 'War of Independence' by Indians?
- The British used the word only in Scotland, where the army's officers came from
- The Indians called it a mutiny in their own books and newspapers at the time
- Both sides agreed on the name, and it was recorded the same way in every book
- The name depends on viewpoint, and winners often shape the words used
-
Which example shows resistance by 'leaders and writers'?
- Enslaved people kept their languages secret in fields
- Educated colonial subjects demanded rights and fairer treatment
- Farmers refused to pay taxes at night
- Soldiers rose with muskets
-
Which fact is the best evidence that some British people and settlers were winners from the empire?
- Indentured workers were shipped abroad to labour on plantations far from home
- Millions died in famines while grain was exported from the country by ship
- Indian weavers lost their work when cheap British cloth flooded the markets
- Settlers took fertile land in Kenya and Australia
-
Why do historians say 'winners and losers' is a balanced-judgement frame rather than a simple good or bad story?
- The empire had no effects on anyone
- Effects differed by group and place, so different people gained or lost
- Historians agree the empire was entirely good
- Historians agree the empire was entirely bad for everyone
-
Why was indentured labour a loss for the workers shipped across the empire?
- They could return home whenever they liked, once their short contract had ended
- They were made managers of plantations and given the right to hire their own workers
- They were given free land and high wages in the colonies they had come to work in
- They were bound by harsh contracts for years, often for low pay and far from home
Related quizzes
- What Is an Empire Quiz · Y8-U02-L01 · 20 questions
- The British in India Company to Raj Quiz · Y8-U02-L02 · 20 questions
- The Scramble for Africa Quiz · Y8-U02-L03 · 20 questions
- Empire A Force for Good or Ill Quiz · Y8-U02-L05 · 20 questions
- The Legacy of Empire Today Quiz · Y8-U02-L06 · 20 questions
- What Is History Quiz · Y7-U01-L01 · 20 questions
- 1066 Who Should Be King Quiz · Y7-U02-L07 · 20 questions
- Securing Control Motte-and-Bailey Castles Quiz · Y7-U03-L01 · 20 questions
- King John A Good or Bad King Quiz · Y7-U04-L01 · 20 questions
- Life in a Medieval Village Quiz · Y7-U05-L01 · 20 questions