Lesson Y7-U03-L04
Y7-U03-L04 The Harrying of the North, 1069-70 Quiz: KS3 History, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson Y7-U03-L04, The Harrying of the North, 1069-70: 20 multiple choice questions for the KS3 History (National Curriculum), Unit 3: Year 7: Norman England, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
In which year did the north of England rise in open revolt against William?
- 1069
- 1085
- 1066
- 1070
-
Which area of England was especially hard for William to control?
- The Midlands, around Mercia
- The north, especially Yorkshire
- The south-east, around Kent
- The far south-west, around Cornwall
-
Who was the Norman earl killed by rebels at Durham in 1069?
- Edgar the Aetheling
- William of Poitiers
- Harold Godwinson
- Robert Cumin
-
What did the rebels in the north do after killing Robert Cumin?
- They sailed to Normandy to attack William's home in Caen
- They surrendered to William and asked him to pardon them
- They joined a huge Danish army that sailed up to attack York
- They marched south to join Harold's sons in the Danelaw
-
What was the 'harrying' of the north?
- A trade agreement that gave the northern towns control over the ports along the coast
- A long siege of York that lasted through the winter of 1069 until the city finally surrendered
- A peaceful meeting between William and the northern lords to agree new taxes for the region
- A deliberate campaign of burning crops, homes and food stores to destroy the north
-
Why did William pay the Danish fleet to leave?
- He could not beat them in battle
- The Pope had ordered him to pay all Danish armies
- The Danes had asked him to make peace with the north
- He had run out of money for his own soldiers
-
What is 'scorched earth'?
- Burning a city's walls so that the enemy cannot climb them
- Planting dry crops in the fields so that they will burn in summer
- Destroying crops, food and animals so the enemy cannot be fed
- Digging deep ditches around a castle to block enemy supplies
-
What was the main reason William destroyed the north?
- To clear land for new Norman monasteries across Yorkshire
- To give the land to the Church as a payment for its help
- To stop the north feeding any future rebellion or Danish army
- To build new stone castles in the empty northern fields
-
Which winter did the Harrying of the north take place?
- The winter of 1085 to 1086
- The winter of 1069 to 1070
- The winter of 1066 to 1067
- The winter of 1100 to 1101
-
Why did famine follow the Harrying of the north?
- The Danes had carried all the grain back to their homeland on their ships after the attack
- The Church had taken all the food to store in monasteries across the north of England
- The Normans had poisoned the wells of every northern village so that no one could drink water
- Food stores, animals and seed corn had been destroyed, so survivors had nothing to eat or plant
-
What happened to some northerners who survived the Harrying?
- They became Norman knights and fought in the Danish army
- They were all given new land by William as a reward
- They were moved to Normandy to work on William's estates
- Some fled south as refugees or sold themselves into slavery to survive
-
Why do historians doubt the chronicler's claim that 100,000 people died?
- Because the chronicler was a Danish monk who hated the English
- Because the chronicler wrote only about the deaths of the Danish soldiers
- Medieval writers often exaggerated and used round numbers that cannot be checked
- Because the chronicler was a Norman who had never visited the north
-
Which group suffered most from the Harrying of the north?
- The Norman knights who had been sent to burn the villages
- The Danish soldiers who had been paid to leave the north
- The rebel leaders who had been killed in the battle at Durham
- Ordinary northern farmers and families, especially the poorest
-
Why did more people die from famine than from the soldiers?
- The destroyed food and seed corn meant there was nothing to eat or plant
- The famine was caused by the Danish army burning the harvest
- The soldiers only killed rebel leaders and no ordinary people
- The soldiers were too gentle to kill many people in the villages
-
What was the Harrying's effect in the short term compared with the long term?
- The destruction lasted for centuries, but its effects were never felt
- The destruction lasted years, but its effects ended within a single month
- The destruction was short, but its effects, including famine, lasted years
- Both the destruction and its effects ended the very same week
-
Why was William's victory at Hastings not enough to control England?
- The English had won a second battle at Hastings in 1067 and driven William back to Normandy
- The Pope had withdrawn his blessing and the Normans had lost their army in a battle at sea
- The north was distant, proudly independent and still loyal to Anglo-Saxon and Viking ways
- The Danes had already captured London and the towns along the south coast of England
-
What is the best description of the Harrying of the north?
- A peace treaty between William and the Danish kings
- A planned destruction designed to make the north unable to rebel
- A tax reform that raised the money to rebuild the north
- A battle that William won in a single day at York
-
Why did rebels in the north have support from Danes?
- Many northerners had strong Viking links and did not accept a Norman king
- The Danes had married the Norman earls and joined their families
- The Danes had been promised the whole of England by the Pope
- The Danes were trading furs and wool with the Normans in Durham
-
Which statement about the Harrying best shows its brutality?
- William built a stone cathedral in York as a sign of peace
- William paid the Danes to leave without any loss of life
- Villages, crops and animals were destroyed, and famine followed in 1070
- William gave the northern farmers new land to make up for it
-
Which of these is the best evaluation of the Harrying's significance?
- It shows that the north had already been fully controlled by the Normans
- It shows that conquest needed brutal force to secure control of the distant north
- It shows that the Danes had conquered the north before William arrived
- It shows that William was a generous king who forgave the northern rebels
Related quizzes
- Securing Control Motte-and-Bailey Castles Quiz · Y7-U03-L01 · 20 questions
- The Feudal System Land for Loyalty Quiz · Y7-U03-L02 · 20 questions
- The Domesday Book, 1086 Quiz · Y7-U03-L03 · 20 questions
- How Far Did the Normans Change England Quiz · Y7-U03-L05 · 20 questions
- What Is History Quiz · Y7-U01-L01 · 20 questions
- 1066 Who Should Be King Quiz · Y7-U02-L07 · 20 questions
- King John A Good or Bad King Quiz · Y7-U04-L01 · 20 questions
- Life in a Medieval Village Quiz · Y7-U05-L01 · 20 questions
- The Tudors Arrive A New Dynasty Quiz · Y7-U06-L01 · 20 questions
- The Stuarts Arrive A New King for England Quiz · Y8-U01-L01 · 20 questions