Lesson WS-2
WS-2 Maintaining a consistent point of view Quiz: AQA English Language, Unit 3
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson WS-2, Maintaining a consistent point of view: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE English Language (8700), Unit 3: Assessment objectives, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What does 'maintaining a consistent point of view' mean in writing?
- Changing the narrator in each paragraph so that the reader sees several different perspectives quickly
- Alternating between a formal and an informal register from one paragraph to the next for variety
- Writing in the past tense for the first half and in the future tense for the second half of the text
- Keeping the same narrator, perspective and attitude towards the topic from beginning to end
-
A writer starts in the first person ('I') and then switches to the third person ('she') mid-story. What is the problem?
- The text is more interesting because the reader is kept guessing about who the narrator really is
- The text uses a permitted technique that is always accepted in all forms of extended writing
- The text is more formal because the third person is always more respectful than the first person
- The point of view shifts without reason, which can confuse the reader about who is narrating
-
Which sentence keeps a consistent point of view in an argument written in the first person plural?
- The library should stay open, and I, you and the council should all make it happen together
- We believe the library should stay open, and we will explain why our community needs it most
- We believe the library should stay open, though they say that it is not needed by anyone at all
- I believe the library should stay open, and the reader must understand that it matters to them
-
Which of these is the most likely to disrupt a consistent point of view in a viewpoint article?
- Suddenly presenting the opposing side as if it were the writer's own belief, without any signal
- Supporting each point with an example that clearly links back to the main argument of the piece
- Stating the writer's position clearly in the opening paragraph and returning to it in the conclusion
- Using the same tone of respectful disagreement throughout, so that the argument feels steady
-
A narrative is told by a child who is confused by adult events. What does a consistent point of view require?
- The narrator should switch to an adult who explains everything to the reader in detail at the start
- The narrator should become an omniscient voice in the final paragraph, to resolve all the loose ends
- The child's limited understanding should be kept throughout, so the events are seen only as the child sees them
- The child should suddenly understand every adult motive by the end, so the story can be resolved neatly
-
Which change best improves the consistency of a letter written to a newspaper?
- Switching to a list of questions in the second half, without any answers or any clear link to the stance
- Keeping the writer's stance and formal tone the same, and linking every example back to that stance
- Including a short poem in the middle, so that the reader sees a different side of the writer's personality
- Adding a sudden joke about a celebrity in the middle of the argument, then returning to the topic
-
Which is an example of a consistent tone in a persuasive text?
- Changing the tone each paragraph to match the emotional state of the writer at that moment
- Using slang in the opening lines and then switching to a formal and archaic style at the end
- Using measured, respectful language throughout, even when addressing a view the writer opposes
- Starting with polite language, then shouting in capital letters in the final paragraph of the text
-
What is the effect of consistent perspective in a descriptive piece about a seaside town?
- The reader follows one observer's view and builds a clear, coherent picture of the place
- The reader is told only facts, with no observer present, so that the scene feels distant
- The reader is told the same fact three times, which is a sign of a consistent perspective
- The reader is pulled between several observers, which makes the place harder to picture
-
Which of these shows a shift in point of view that is controlled and intentional?
- Moving from the first person to the second person in the middle of a single sentence, for no reason
- Moving from one character to another without any transition, so that the reader must guess the change
- Moving from a formal argument to a set of random facts, without any link or signpost to the reader
- Moving from a close-up of one character to a wider view of the crowd, signalled by a clear transition
-
A student writes an essay on a school trip and then uses 'you' to address the reader in the final paragraph only. Why could this matter?
- It shows that the student has finished the essay early and is simply addressing the marker directly
- It may change the viewpoint and tone at the end, which may need to be justified or made consistent
- It proves that the student has used a second-person narrator, which is always the best choice for essays
- It is always incorrect in any form of writing, so the student must remove the pronoun at all costs
-
Which statement describes a consistent perspective in writing about a debate?
- The writer supports the motion in one paragraph and opposes it in the next without any explanation
- The writer asks the reader to decide for themselves, and then refuses to share the writer's own view
- The writer summarises every speaker equally and never states a position, so the piece is neutral
- The writer presents the debate from one stance and does not switch allegiance within the same argument
-
Which tense choice is most likely to help a narrative keep a consistent point of view?
- Using a different tense for each character, so that every perspective has its own time frame
- Using one main tense for the narrative and changing it only when a clear time shift is signalled
- Changing tense every sentence so that the narrative feels more varied and modern for the reader
- Using only the present tense for past events and the past tense for future events in the story
-
A writer describes a storm from the viewpoint of a sailor, but then suddenly describes what a scientist in a lab would think. What is the issue?
- The writer has used a rhetorical device, since shifting viewpoint is a form of parenthesis for effect
- The writer has used the correct technique for an omniscient narrator, which is always the best choice
- The writer has written a neutral account, because two viewpoints are always more objective than one
- The perspective shifts without warning, so the reader loses track of whose view they are sharing
-
Which of these is the best way to keep a viewpoint consistent in a speech?
- Asking the audience to decide what the speaker's position should be, then changing it accordingly
- Ending the speech with a position that contradicts the opening, to surprise the audience at the close
- Introducing a new position in the middle of the speech so that the audience stays interested
- Repeating the speaker's core position in each section and linking every example back to it
-
Which sentence most clearly keeps a single point of view in a description?
- The harbour lights blink from the hill, and you, the narrator, see the boats returning slowly now
- From the hill, the harbour lights blink below, and I, the reader, can see the boats returning
- From the hill, I can see the harbour lights blinking below me as the boats slowly return to shore
- From the hill, the harbour lights blink below, while one of the boats is seen by the other sailors
-
Which element is most important for keeping a viewpoint consistent over a long extended response?
- A new stance introduced in each paragraph, so the response feels fresh and wide ranging to readers
- A list of statistics placed at the end, which then overrides any stance expressed in the opening
- A set of rhetorical questions that suggest no answer, so the reader can choose their own stance
- A clear stance stated early, with each paragraph developing or supporting that stance
-
Which of these is a point of view issue rather than a technical accuracy issue?
- Using a comma incorrectly to separate two items in a list of three things
- Writing 'recieve' instead of 'receive' in a sentence that is otherwise clear and accurate
- Writing 'alot' instead of 'a lot' in a sentence about the weather in summer
- Switching between 'I' and 'the writer' for the same narrator within a single argument piece
-
A letter writer uses 'we' for the community in paragraph one and 'they' for the same community later. What is the effect?
- The writer's alignment with the community becomes unclear, weakening the consistency of the viewpoint
- The writer's letter becomes a story, because the change of pronoun creates a narrative character
- The writer's alignment becomes stronger, because the community is now seen from outside the writing
- The writer's letter becomes a more objective account, since outsider pronouns are always neutral
-
What is the best reason for planning a consistent point of view before writing?
- It guarantees a high mark for technical accuracy, regardless of the spelling and punctuation used
- It means the writer can skip the conclusion, since a consistent viewpoint needs no ending at all
- It helps the writer decide the narrator, stance and tone that will be kept throughout the response
- It ensures the writer will automatically use every rhetorical device without having to think about them
-
Which phrase best signals a deliberate and well-controlled change of viewpoint in a long narrative?
- Then suddenly the village is someone else's, and the teacher is also a dog who runs through the square
- Meanwhile, somewhere else entirely, a person who is nothing like anyone else in the story goes away
- Several years later, the story returns to the village, this time seen through the eyes of the old teacher
- The village went one way and the teacher went another, and nobody in the story really minded at all
Related quizzes
- Identify and interpret explicit information and ideas Quiz · AO1-1 · 20 questions
- Draw inferences: identify and interpret implicit information Quiz · AO1-2 · 20 questions
- Select and synthesise evidence from different texts Quiz · AO1-3 · 20 questions
- Explain how writers use vocabulary and grammar to achieve effects Quiz · AO2-1 · 20 questions
- Analyse how writers use structure to influence readers Quiz · AO2-2 · 20 questions
- Use subject terminology to support views Quiz · AO2-3 · 20 questions
- Compare ideas and perspectives across two or more texts Quiz · AO3-1 · 20 questions
- Compare how ideas and perspectives are conveyed Quiz · AO3-2 · 20 questions
- Evaluate texts critically Quiz · AO4-1 · 20 questions
- Support evaluation with textual references Quiz · AO4-2 · 20 questions