Lesson 3.2.4.7.1

3.2.4.7.1 Biological explanation: hereditary factors and Kaij's twin study of alcohol abuse Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 8

20 questions

In partnership with Revision Ninja

Lesson 3.2.4.7.1, Biological explanation: hereditary factors and Kaij's twin study of alcohol abuse: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE Psychology (8182), Unit 8: Psychological problems, written with Revision Ninja.

Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.

Host this setFree Play

The 20 questions

  1. What is the biological explanation of addiction in the specification?

    • Learned behaviour from friends and peers in a social group only
    • Random exposure to advertising for drinks and other products in the media
    • Negative thinking patterns about the self that are formed in childhood
    • Hereditary factors or genetic vulnerability that may be passed on through families
  2. What is genetic vulnerability?

    • A guarantee that a person will develop addiction at some point in their life
    • An inherited tendency that may make addiction more likely
    • A learned habit that can be unlearned completely within a single day
    • A protection that makes a person immune to all substances at any dose
  3. What did Kaij's twin study examine?

    • The sleep patterns of twins during their teenage years at school
    • The effect of diet on the adult height of twins across generations
    • The number of neurons in the frontal lobes of twins in adulthood
    • The concordance of alcohol abuse in pairs of twins
  4. Why are identical (monozygotic) twins useful in a study of hereditary factors?

    • They are always the same sex, which controls for differences in diet between the twins
    • They always live apart from birth, which removes all environmental influence from the study
    • They share no genes at all, so any similarity between them must come from learned behaviour
    • They share all of their genes, so higher concordance than non-identical twins suggests a genetic influence
  5. Kaij's study found that identical twins were more likely than non-identical twins to share alcohol abuse. What conclusion is supported?

    • Genetic factors may contribute to alcohol abuse, though other factors may also play a part
    • Non-identical twins are always more alike than identical twins in every case
    • Alcohol abuse is never influenced by genes in any person or any family
    • Alcohol abuse is entirely caused by genetics with no other influence at all
  6. What is a limitation of the twin study for explaining addiction?

    • Identical twins may also share similar environments, so environment cannot be fully ruled out
    • Twin studies only examine people who have never used a substance, so they cannot explain addiction
    • Twin studies cannot be used in psychology research because twins are too rare to recruit
    • Identical twins never share any environment at any point in their lives together
  7. Which is a nature explanation of addiction?

    • Social rewards for drinking with friends at the local pub at night
    • Hereditary factors that make some people more vulnerable to developing addiction
    • Peer pressure encouraging use in a group setting over the weekend
    • Learning to use a substance from family members at home in childhood
  8. A researcher finds that addiction runs in families but cannot separate genes from environment. Which concept is most relevant?

    • The difficulty of separating nature and nurture influences
    • The number of hours of sleep taken by adolescents during the school week
    • The thickness of the skull in adult participants of the study group
    • The strength of the magnetic field used in an fMRI scanner in the lab
  9. Which statement best describes hereditary factors in addiction?

    • They are fixed events that occur after birth in the hospital ward
    • They are environmental factors that only affect the skin and the hair
    • They are inherited differences that can increase the risk of developing addiction
    • They are learned behaviours that children copy from their parents over time
  10. Which design feature makes Kaij's study a comparison of genetic similarity?

    • Comparing the diets of two different countries across the same period
    • Comparing reaction times of siblings who were raised in separate homes
    • Comparing how often alcohol abuse occurs in identical and non-identical twin pairs
    • Comparing the brain scans of unrelated adults who have never met each other
  11. Which evidence would most strongly support a hereditary explanation of alcohol abuse?

    • Concordance found only in people who never drink alcohol at all
    • Higher concordance in identical twins than in non-identical twins
    • Equal concordance among unrelated people who live in the same town
    • Higher concordance in non-identical twins than in identical twins
  12. A biological explanation says addiction is caused by genetics. Which criticism is most appropriate?

    • It proves that addiction is caused by peer influence alone in every case
    • It may underestimate the role of learning and social influences
    • It has no evidence from any study to support it at all
    • It applies only to people who have never used a substance in their life
  13. What is the nature/nurture debate in addiction?

    • Whether addiction is a physical injury or a skin condition of the body
    • Whether addiction develops only in cities or only in rural areas of the country
    • Whether addiction should be measured in hours or in minutes of use
    • Whether addiction is mainly due to inherited biology or learned experience
  14. Which of the following is a hereditary factor that could influence addiction?

    • A holiday in a different country that the family took last summer
    • A broken arm from a sports injury that happened during a school match
    • A genetic vulnerability inherited from a parent
    • A new job that changes the person's daily routines over several weeks
  15. Why might a researcher be cautious about concluding that genes cause alcohol abuse from twin data?

    • Twin data prove causation beyond any doubt in every family studied
    • Twin data are always identical to the results from brain scan studies
    • Twin data show an association and cannot fully rule out a shared environment
    • Twin data never involve any human participants at all in the research
  16. What does 'concordance' mean in the context of Kaij's study?

    • The difference in height between the two twins at the same age
    • The extent to which both twins in a pair share the same trait or behaviour
    • The number of times the twins met each year for family events
    • The distance between the homes of the two twins in the study
  17. Which statement about hereditary explanations is most accurate?

    • Inherited factors fully determine addiction in every case that is observed
    • Inherited factors have no influence on any behaviour in any person at all
    • Inherited factors only affect physical height and not behaviour or mood
    • Inherited factors can increase risk but do not determine addiction
  18. A critic says twin studies assume identical twins share environments equally. What is the critic pointing to?

    • The sample size is always too large for the researchers to analyse fully
    • The equal environment assumption may not hold, so the results could be affected
    • The studies use only questionnaires about food and exercise habits
    • The participants are always too old to be tested in the study
  19. Which best describes genetic vulnerability in addiction?

    • A total immunity that prevents any addiction from developing in the person
    • A learned response that changes completely after one week of practice
    • A guaranteed route to addiction for every person who uses any substance
    • A tendency that is inherited, making a person more susceptible under certain conditions
  20. Why is it useful to combine biological and psychological explanations of addiction?

    • Each explanation covers different influences, so a fuller picture can be developed
    • Each explanation makes the other one unnecessary and should be dropped
    • Combining them removes the need for any evidence from research studies
    • Each explanation covers exactly the same single factor in the same way

All AQA Psychology quizzes