Lesson 3.2.4.7.1
3.2.4.7.1 Biological explanation: hereditary factors and Kaij's twin study of alcohol abuse Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 8
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 3.2.4.7.1, Biological explanation: hereditary factors and Kaij's twin study of alcohol abuse: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE Psychology (8182), Unit 8: Psychological problems, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What is the biological explanation of addiction in the specification?
- Learned behaviour from friends and peers in a social group only
- Random exposure to advertising for drinks and other products in the media
- Negative thinking patterns about the self that are formed in childhood
- Hereditary factors or genetic vulnerability that may be passed on through families
-
What is genetic vulnerability?
- A guarantee that a person will develop addiction at some point in their life
- An inherited tendency that may make addiction more likely
- A learned habit that can be unlearned completely within a single day
- A protection that makes a person immune to all substances at any dose
-
What did Kaij's twin study examine?
- The sleep patterns of twins during their teenage years at school
- The effect of diet on the adult height of twins across generations
- The number of neurons in the frontal lobes of twins in adulthood
- The concordance of alcohol abuse in pairs of twins
-
Why are identical (monozygotic) twins useful in a study of hereditary factors?
- They are always the same sex, which controls for differences in diet between the twins
- They always live apart from birth, which removes all environmental influence from the study
- They share no genes at all, so any similarity between them must come from learned behaviour
- They share all of their genes, so higher concordance than non-identical twins suggests a genetic influence
-
Kaij's study found that identical twins were more likely than non-identical twins to share alcohol abuse. What conclusion is supported?
- Genetic factors may contribute to alcohol abuse, though other factors may also play a part
- Non-identical twins are always more alike than identical twins in every case
- Alcohol abuse is never influenced by genes in any person or any family
- Alcohol abuse is entirely caused by genetics with no other influence at all
-
What is a limitation of the twin study for explaining addiction?
- Identical twins may also share similar environments, so environment cannot be fully ruled out
- Twin studies only examine people who have never used a substance, so they cannot explain addiction
- Twin studies cannot be used in psychology research because twins are too rare to recruit
- Identical twins never share any environment at any point in their lives together
-
Which is a nature explanation of addiction?
- Social rewards for drinking with friends at the local pub at night
- Hereditary factors that make some people more vulnerable to developing addiction
- Peer pressure encouraging use in a group setting over the weekend
- Learning to use a substance from family members at home in childhood
-
A researcher finds that addiction runs in families but cannot separate genes from environment. Which concept is most relevant?
- The difficulty of separating nature and nurture influences
- The number of hours of sleep taken by adolescents during the school week
- The thickness of the skull in adult participants of the study group
- The strength of the magnetic field used in an fMRI scanner in the lab
-
Which statement best describes hereditary factors in addiction?
- They are fixed events that occur after birth in the hospital ward
- They are environmental factors that only affect the skin and the hair
- They are inherited differences that can increase the risk of developing addiction
- They are learned behaviours that children copy from their parents over time
-
Which design feature makes Kaij's study a comparison of genetic similarity?
- Comparing the diets of two different countries across the same period
- Comparing reaction times of siblings who were raised in separate homes
- Comparing how often alcohol abuse occurs in identical and non-identical twin pairs
- Comparing the brain scans of unrelated adults who have never met each other
-
Which evidence would most strongly support a hereditary explanation of alcohol abuse?
- Concordance found only in people who never drink alcohol at all
- Higher concordance in identical twins than in non-identical twins
- Equal concordance among unrelated people who live in the same town
- Higher concordance in non-identical twins than in identical twins
-
A biological explanation says addiction is caused by genetics. Which criticism is most appropriate?
- It proves that addiction is caused by peer influence alone in every case
- It may underestimate the role of learning and social influences
- It has no evidence from any study to support it at all
- It applies only to people who have never used a substance in their life
-
What is the nature/nurture debate in addiction?
- Whether addiction is a physical injury or a skin condition of the body
- Whether addiction develops only in cities or only in rural areas of the country
- Whether addiction should be measured in hours or in minutes of use
- Whether addiction is mainly due to inherited biology or learned experience
-
Which of the following is a hereditary factor that could influence addiction?
- A holiday in a different country that the family took last summer
- A broken arm from a sports injury that happened during a school match
- A genetic vulnerability inherited from a parent
- A new job that changes the person's daily routines over several weeks
-
Why might a researcher be cautious about concluding that genes cause alcohol abuse from twin data?
- Twin data prove causation beyond any doubt in every family studied
- Twin data are always identical to the results from brain scan studies
- Twin data show an association and cannot fully rule out a shared environment
- Twin data never involve any human participants at all in the research
-
What does 'concordance' mean in the context of Kaij's study?
- The difference in height between the two twins at the same age
- The extent to which both twins in a pair share the same trait or behaviour
- The number of times the twins met each year for family events
- The distance between the homes of the two twins in the study
-
Which statement about hereditary explanations is most accurate?
- Inherited factors fully determine addiction in every case that is observed
- Inherited factors have no influence on any behaviour in any person at all
- Inherited factors only affect physical height and not behaviour or mood
- Inherited factors can increase risk but do not determine addiction
-
A critic says twin studies assume identical twins share environments equally. What is the critic pointing to?
- The sample size is always too large for the researchers to analyse fully
- The equal environment assumption may not hold, so the results could be affected
- The studies use only questionnaires about food and exercise habits
- The participants are always too old to be tested in the study
-
Which best describes genetic vulnerability in addiction?
- A total immunity that prevents any addiction from developing in the person
- A learned response that changes completely after one week of practice
- A guaranteed route to addiction for every person who uses any substance
- A tendency that is inherited, making a person more susceptible under certain conditions
-
Why is it useful to combine biological and psychological explanations of addiction?
- Each explanation covers different influences, so a fuller picture can be developed
- Each explanation makes the other one unnecessary and should be dropped
- Combining them removes the need for any evidence from research studies
- Each explanation covers exactly the same single factor in the same way
Related quizzes
- Encoding, storage and retrieval: how memories are encoded and stored Quiz · 3.1.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Difference between sensation and perception Quiz · 3.1.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Brain structures from the womb: brain stem, thalamus, cerebellum, cortex Quiz · 3.1.3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Null and alternative hypotheses Quiz · 3.1.4.1.1 · 20 questions
- Social and dispositional factors affecting conformity to majority influence Quiz · 3.2.1.1.1 · 20 questions
- Piaget's theory: language depends on thought Quiz · 3.2.2.1.1 · 20 questions
- Central and peripheral (somatic and autonomic) nervous systems Quiz · 3.2.3.1.1 · 20 questions
- Episodic, semantic and procedural memory Quiz · 3.1.1.1.2 · 20 questions
- Monocular depth cues: height in plane, relative size, occlusion, linear perspective Quiz · 3.1.2.2.1 · 20 questions
- Roles of nature and nurture in development Quiz · 3.1.3.1.2 · 20 questions